This episode argues against “sugary” learning in HR and leadership—catchy slogans and simplistic insights that feel good but don’t actually change behaviour. Using stand-up comedy as a metaphor, we contrasts cheap, stereotype-driven laughs with the kind of complex, nuanced thinking that takes time to build but delivers real insight, likening his approach to comedians like Chris Rock who earn meaning through depth rather than slogans.

We discuss how these podcasts deliberately avoid reductive ideas in favour of complexity, because real learning only counts if it leads you to do something differently in the future. Warm buzzes and motivational soundbites create the illusion of learning, but genuine development comes from slower, more demanding ideas that lodge in your brain and subtly change your decisions next time you face a real situation.

I explore the idea of “magic words” — phrases we treat as if they instantly change a situation — and why leaders shouldn’t fall for them. Drawing on fantasy stories where magic requires rules, triggers, and consequences, I explain how certain workplace words like please, sorry, and work-life balance are often used as conversation-enders rather than starting points.

While words matter and give us insight into intent and understanding, they are not spells that automatically fix problems or resolve expectations. The real work is to keep listening, keep asking questions, and understand what sits behind the words, rather than assuming that saying the right phrase moves us from problem to solution.

This episode delivers a practical HR lesson on decision-making, arguing that HR’s role is not to make decisions but to ensure decisions are made well by identifying risks and variables. It distinguishes bad decisions from risky ones, explaining that a bad decision is not simply one with a poor outcome, but one that was flawed based on what was known at the time—rather than judged through hindsight.

Risky decisions are inevitable whenever outcomes depend on variables, and they are not inherently bad; the real problem is unanticipated or unknown risks. The focus for HR, therefore, should be on surfacing known and unknown variables, closing awareness gaps, and “setting the table” so managers can clearly see the possible consequences of each option.

Managers must own the decisions, while HR’s responsibility is to prevent bad, risky decisions by ensuring risks are recognised, understood, and consciously accepted rather than discovered after the fact.

This week we talk about the “flawed mentor” — that Gandalf/Dumbledore/Merlin figure who guides us… until the moment their limitations show us it’s time to grow up and step out on our own. Then we flip that archetype onto real-world management.

Why do the models that help new managers eventually hold experienced ones back? And how has the well-meaning push toward nurturing, supporting, and “cheerleading” accidentally discouraged everyday correction, early feedback, and the small course-adjustments that prevent big problems later? If you’ve ever felt the tension between being supportive and holding people to account, this episode shows you where that comes from — and what to do about it.

This episode examines how hype often outpaces reality in business, using WeWork, Bodega Boxes, and Theranos as examples of ideas that generated enormous buzz but couldn’t deliver on their promises, then applies Gartner’s hype cycle to show how new concepts move from excitement to disappointment before settling into their true value. You use this lens to question whether the shift from “HR” to “People & Culture” represents real change or just a rebrand, concluding that the answer varies by organisation and may be more hype than substance, especially since the underlying administrative and compliance work hasn’t disappeared. Ultimately, you argue that if workplaces want genuine improvement, they must change their practices—not just their job titles.

In this episode, I weave together a story about two five-year-olds, Tracy Chapman’s Fast Car, and the Dunning–Kruger effect to explore why some people feel and understand things they can’t yet explain—and why, in the workplace, we so often mistake confidence for competence. From the beauty of a song you have to experience yourself to the quiet experts sitting at the bottom of the curve, this episode looks at why the loudest voices aren’t always the wisest.

You've been warned.... so don't blame me...

What would future beings think of us if humanity suddenly disappeared? That’s a thought experiment I dive into in this week’s episode — and it leads somewhere far more relevant to our everyday lives than you might expect. If humans vanished tomorrow and were rediscovered centuries later, what story would our civilization tell?

Would they think chocolates, perfume, and watches were pillars of our culture because every airport on Earth displays the same things? Their conclusions would come from an imperfect sample of our world — and much of it would be wrong. And that’s where the episode takes its turn.

Because we do the same thing right now. We mistake simulacra — distorted reflections of reality — for truth; Tourism ads, Airport terminals, Instagram influencers living their “best life.” Even HR advice on LinkedIn (the irony).

These things look true, they feel true, but they’re often simplified, polished, edited, or curated versions of reality.

The real skill?

- Not falling for the illusion.

- Not confusing a glossy snapshot for the full picture.

- Training yourself to ask: “This seems true… but when might it not be?”

I also tackle a question I sometimes get: “Is this too much for your audience?” My answer is always no- I’m not here to give victory laps for what you already know — I’m here to stretch you. To treat you like smart, capable thinkers who can handle nuance and complexity.