Episodi

  • PRIVATE PLACEMENT LIFE INSURANCE
    Oct 6 2026
    Private Placement Life Insurance (PPLI) is a life insurance policy used as a tax-efficient wrapper for long-term investments. It works best for families who have money they will never spend, who can commit about $10 million in premium, who hold the policy in an irrevocable trust, and who are willing to give up control of investment decisions. In this episode of Wealth Actually, JAY JUDAS, CEO of Life Insurance Strategies Group, explains how PPLI works, who it fits, where it gets missold, and how compounding inside a properly built policy can reach the third, fourth, and fifth generations. https://youtu.be/fIknhINvP5I Episode Overview PPLI has moved from a niche product to one of the most discussed tools in ultra-high-net-worth planning. It now shows up in my own practice and in many conversations with trust and estate lawyers. I asked Jay Judas to help sort out the opportunities from the risks. Jay runs a fee-based consultancy that does not sell insurance. Well over 60% of his firm’s work now involves PPLI. Yet he says more than half of the people who come to him believing they need PPLI should be in something else, or in nothing at all. Our discussion covers why tax-inefficient alternatives such as private credit fit inside the policy, why the policy belongs in an irrevocable trust, and Jay’s “magic has a price” rule of thumb for minimum premium. We compare insurance-dedicated funds (IDFs) with separately managed accounts (SMAs), walk through the investor control and diversification rules, and look at why the “tax-free loans” pitch misses the point. We close with a case study: $50 million, three policies, and a 40-year runway. Key Takeaways PPLI is not for everybody. More than half of the prospects Jay’s firm evaluates are better served by another solution. Use money you will never touch. Jay says the right question is not what percentage of a portfolio to commit. It is which dollars are already set aside for children and grandchildren.Magic has a price. Jay’s practical minimum is about $10 million of premium, paid in as quickly as possible. Some low-cost carriers can make $5 million work. Tax-inefficient assets benefit most. Private credit, private equity, real estate, litigation finance, life settlements, and infrastructure can face combined tax rates above 50% for New York and California residents. Own the policy in an irrevocable trust. A policy held personally pulls the death benefit into the insured’s taxable estate. IDFs and SMAs offer two routes. An IDF is an insurance-only version of a fund and usually covers a single strategy. An SMA lets a manager, often the family’s existing RIA, run a discretionary mandate under a broad investment policy statement. Investor control is the real risk. You can choose an IDF or set broad goals with an SMA manager. You cannot direct trades, pick specific deals, or arrange a plan before the policy is issued. Emails can be subpoenaed. Diversification is policed for you. Under Section 817(h), one investment cannot exceed 55% of the account, two cannot exceed 70%, three cannot exceed 80%, and four cannot exceed 90%. Carriers hire fund administrators to monitor compliance. Policy loans are a weak selling point. In PPLI, the manager must sell assets to fund a loan, which can disrupt compounding and run into lockups. In 23 years, Jay has seen no more than 10 policies tapped for a distribution. Trustees and trust protectors need periodic reviews. Jay’s firm found one 30-year-old policy whose fees were double current market levels and got them reduced. Check who is selling. Most PPLI is now issued by established carriers and requires securities-licensed professionals. Be cautious of unlicensed producers who push offshore carriers. The prize is G3 to G5. In Jay’s illustration, $50 million compounding at 9% inside a policy reaches about $1.6 billion over 40 years. The same money in a taxable California account, after federal estate tax, reaches about $159 million. Chapters 00:00 Introduction and disclaimer00:45 Why PPLI dominates UHNW planning conversations01:26 Life Insurance Strategies Group and why most PPLI inquiries are not a fit02:32 Asset location: tax-inefficient alternatives and the life insurance chassis04:45 Why the policy belongs in an irrevocable trust05:23 The ideal client and the “magic has a price” minimum07:07 How much to commit: money you will never touch08:06 Retail life insurance versus PPLI10:28 Insurance-dedicated funds (IDFs) versus separately managed accounts (SMAs)12:02 Why RIAs are embracing the SMA route12:52 Investor control: what you can and cannot do14:42 Diversification rules under Section 817(h)16:17 Single assets, Webber v. Commissioner, and prearranged plans17:53 It takes a village: the parties and their fees19:31 The liquidity myth and the problem with policy loans21:37 The trustee’s role and reviewing older policies23:34 Borrowing from the policy and the last-bucket principle26:23 Questions to ask ...
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    31 min
  • Algorithms, AI, and the Attention Economy
    Sep 24 2026
    DAVID PAKMAN — political commentator, YouTube host, and author of the new book Pay Attention — joins me to talk about Algorithms, AI, and the Attention Economy. We break down how attention became the core commodity of the modern economy, why algorithms reward outrage over nuance, and what happens when AI starts cloning creators without their consent. David walks through the real story of “The Daniel Carter Show,” a YouTube channel that used AI voice-cloning to impersonate him and was algorithmically recommended to his own audience. From there, the conversation covers why right-wing messaging has a structural advantage on algorithmic platforms, what “behavioral surplus” means and how platforms monetize it, and the media-literacy habits families should be teaching the next generation before handing over unrestricted social media access. We also discuss anonymity and accountability online, why the “calm middle” is checking out of social media, and a simple “media diet” framework for staying informed without getting consumed. https://www.amazon.com/Pay-Attention-Algorithms-Suppressing-Rewiring/dp/0063569809/ Themes Why attention is the defining commodity of the digital economy How “rented ground” platforms (YouTube, TikTok, podcasts) shape what creators can say The real story behind an AI deepfake impersonating David Pakman “Behavioral surplus”: how platforms monetize what you don’t even realize about yourself A practical media-diet framework — and how to talk to kids and aging parents about safe media use AI’s Impact on Video Timestamped Show Notes / Chapters 00:00 — Cold open: “You just have to learn how to play the game” — David on the political right’s platform advantage 00:15 — Wealth Actually intro & disclaimer 00:40 — Introducing David Pakman and today’s topic: algorithms, attention, and responsible media consumption 00:59 — David’s new book Pay Attention: why he wrote it and the “confessional” behind-the-curtain angle 02:38 — Attention as the “lingua franca” of the modern economy 03:25 — Creating content on “rented ground”: YouTube, TikTok, and podcasting platforms as landlords with no clear lease 04:44 — How Facebook’s shift from chronological feeds to algorithmic “For You” feeds rewired the entire incentive system 06:36 — Why boring-but-important topics (like housing policy) need an emotional hook to break through 07:37 — What the political right does better on these platforms — and why it’s about style, not substance 08:01 — The COVID vaccine messaging case study: fear and scapegoating vs. accurate-but-boring nuance 10:10 — From the traditional GOP to the “Trump party”: the John McCain/POW moment as an inflection point 11:05 — The pre-Trump roots of modern right-wing messaging (AM/low-power FM religious radio, Rush Limbaugh) — and the recent press-corps ban of CNN, Politico, and MSNBC from the White House briefing room 12:08 — Why the “calm middle” checks out of social media, and how outrage drives engagement 12:40 — The trap of over-weighting vocal-minority feedback: “98% of my Twitter replies are anti-social screeds” 14:29 — Online anonymity, accountability, and Jonathan Haidt’s real-identity proposal 14:55 — David’s own experiment: requiring a real email address cut toxic messages by 95–99% 16:10 — AI and deepfakes: the danger of synthetic content built on real people’s data and personalities 16:44 — The “Daniel Carter Show”: how an AI voice clone of David was algorithmically pushed to his own audience 18:59 — “Behavioral surplus” — how platforms monetize the gap between what you say and how you actually behave 21:31 — David’s media-diet “food pyramid”: proactive, vetted sources as the staple; algorithmic scrolling as junk food 24:09 — Advising families and next generations on safer, smarter media habits 25:17 — David’s own household rules on kids, screens, and delaying unrestricted social media access 27:12 — The financial-literacy parallel: media literacy as a life skill that should be taught early 27:58 — The media-literacy pyramid — and the Pew Research finding that most Americans (across party lines) struggle to tell fact from opinion 29:10 — The AI risk multiplier: outsourcing critical thinking to algorithms 29:32 — Where to find Pay Attention and follow David Pakman 30:19 — Closing thanks Transcript [00:00] “So I actually think that from a political standpoint, if what people are trying to do is use these platforms to get the ideas they believe in out, you just have to learn how to play the game. I don’t think there really is any other solution on the political side.” — David Pakman [00:15] [Show Intro] Welcome back to the Wealth Actually podcast, the show that features experts, entrepreneurs, and commentators that will give you the right knowledge, planning, and guidance so you can preserve your assets and enjoy ...
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    31 min
  • AI, Digital Identity, and Estate Planning
    Sep 16 2026
    What happens to your voice, image and online accounts after you die? In this episode of Wealth Actually, I welcome back NATALIA PARKER and TATYANA THURSTON of DEXIT to discuss digital identity and estate planning in the age of AI. https://youtu.be/MdnUcekE-08 The issue is bigger than recovering a password. An executor may have to decide whether to keep a book on sale, preserve a podcast, close a social media account or respond to an AI-generated version of the person who died. Those decisions can put income, reputation and family wishes in conflict. We discuss how to build a digital-asset inventory, document instructions for online accounts, protect against deepfake scams and think through the use of your name, image, likeness and voice. The practical question: does your estate plan give the next person enough information to make these decisions? What we cover Digital estate planning: Why books, podcasts, photographs, recordings and online accounts belong in the planning conversation.Instructions, not just an inventory: What an executor needs to know about the assets, the platforms and what you want done with each account.Deepfake fraud: Why a familiar face or voice should not replace verification when money or sensitive information is involved.AI after death: The questions raised by avatars, simulated social media activity and the reuse of a person’s creative work.Fiduciary judgment: How executors and trustees may have to weigh commercial value against reputation and the emotional impact on a family.A technology component: Why Natalia and Tatyana argue that technology planning belongs alongside wealth, tax and estate planning. Episode timestamps Timestamps refer to the supplied episode audio, including the opening preview and introduction. 00:00 Preview and introduction00:52 Why AI belongs in the estate-planning conversation03:36 Name, image and likeness beyond celebrities04:56 Platform access, ownership and closing accounts06:54 Deepfake fraud and verifying money transfers08:48 Building a digital defense strategy10:22 Digital-asset inventories and consent to AI recreation13:15 Facebook, posthumous posting and the ethics of AI15:46 Avatar businesses and the digital afterlife18:50 Robin Williams and restrictions on likeness21:02 Executors, trustees and the emotional cost to families23:10 Adding a technology component to the estate plan23:53 Where to find DEXIT and closing thoughts About the guests Natalia Parker and Tatyana Thurston are the co-founders of DEXIT, a digital succession-planning business. DEXIT works with clients, wealth advisors and estate planners on plans for online assets and accounts. (DEXIT founder profile; DEXIT) Resources and related episodes DEXIT: Learn about the guests’ work at dexitplan.com.Our earlier conversation: Digital Assets Estate Planning with Natalia Parker and Tatyana Thurston covers digital inheritance, account access and planning for executors.Related Wealth Actually episode: Technology and Estate Planning explores digital tools for estate-planning work. Questions from the episode What should a digital-asset inventory include? In this conversation, we discuss online accounts, publishing platforms, books, podcasts, images, recordings and intellectual property. The emphasis is on pairing the inventory with instructions about what should be preserved, closed or considered for continued use. What should I decide about an AI version of myself? The guests suggest documenting whether you want your voice, image or recordings used to recreate you digitally after death. They also discuss the tension between those wishes, an executor’s decisions and the family’s reaction to the result. Why is this an issue for people who are not celebrities? Our discussion includes family photographs, personal accounts, recordings and unpublished creative work. Their importance may be emotional rather than commercial, which is why the conversation extends beyond celebrity estates. What is the first planning conversation to have? Start with what exists, what matters to you and what you want done with it. The next question is who will have to carry out those instructions and whether they have a usable roadmap. Clarification on the Meta discussion The opening preview and the discussion around 13:15 refer to Meta’s patent for simulating a user’s social media activity, including after death. In February 2026, a Meta spokesperson told Business Insider, “We have no plans to move forward with this example”; the report distinguishes the patent from a decision to implement the technology. (Business Insider) The transcript below preserves the conversation as recorded. This clarification is separate from the speakers’ remarks. Transcript This transcript has been lightly edited for readability, removing filler words and repeated starts while preserving the substance of the conversation. Speaker timestamps are approximate navigation aids; examples and legal or technical statements ...
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    26 min
  • 250 Years of American Compounding with Meb Faber
    Aug 18 2026
    Fire the Whole Investment Team: Meb Faber on 250 Years of American Compounding and Why CalPERS Can’t Beat a 60/40 allocation https://youtu.be/9lBYkG4J2sY A dollar invested in the U.S. stock market in 1800 is worth roughly $200 million today, and Meb Faber says the giant pension funds paid to beat that kind of compounding usually can’t. In this episode of Wealth Actually, Frazer Rice talks with Meb Faber, co-founder and CIO of Cambria Investment Management and host of The Meb Faber Show, about his new coffee-table book Investing in America: The Rise of a 250-Year Bull Market, the shareholder yield thesis behind Cambria’s ETF lineup, and his long-running public campaign arguing that CalPERS and other giant institutional pools routinely fail to beat a simple, low-cost buy-and-hold portfolio. https://open.spotify.com/episode/4WmnPm3GN8jwQtJuCVV9XG?si=nLLcz8y8RSuydORA5_ZHGQ Key Takeaways America is, in Faber’s words, the greatest compounding machine in history. He puts a dollar invested in U.S. stocks in 1800 at roughly $200 million today — a number he uses to reframe how clients should think about staying invested through wars, depressions, and pandemics.The book’s origin story starts with meme stocks. Faber says COVID pulled a new generation of retail investors into the market through gamified trading apps, and he wanted to hand them a historically grounded alternative to day-trading and zero-day options.Diversification is older than the country itself. Faber traces the concept back to 15th- and 16th-century joint-stock voyages — the Mayflower and the Virginia Company among them — where spreading capital across many risky expeditions let “merchant adventurers” survive when any single ship was lost.Shareholder yield, not dividend yield, is Cambria’s core factor. Since the S&P 500’s dividend yield now sits near an all-time low of 1.04%, Faber argues the real signal is cash dividends plus net buybacks — net of the dilution from stock-based compensation that quietly erodes shareholders’ ownership every year.Faber’s CalPERS critique boils down to one line: “the returns are not bad, they’re just not good.” He’s built an entire body of work, including Cambria’s ENDW endowment-style ETF, arguing that giant pools with virtually unlimited access to managers still can’t consistently beat a disciplined global 60/40.Complexity is often the enemy, not the edge. Faber contrasts investing with almost every other field of expertise: hiring the best doctor or coach nearly always helps, but hiring the most sophisticated (and expensive) money manager frequently doesn’t.Illiquidity has a way of showing up at the worst possible time. Faber points to endowments getting caught upside down in 2008–2009 and to more recent leveraged blowups as the same lesson repeating: over-lever a portfolio and you’re out of chips at the poker table.The real accountability gap is career incentives, not investment theory. Faber contrasts Yale, which gets a pass for strong long-term results, with Harvard’s endowment, which he says has underperformed for two decades without anyone losing their job over it — a dynamic he says maps directly onto UHNW family governance. Timestamps [00:00] Cold open — CalPERS CIOs vs. UK prime ministers[00:29] Show open and disclaimer[00:54] Welcome: Meb Faber, Cambria, and the new book[02:07] The $76 price tag and the 1776 joke[03:13] Genesis of Investing in America: COVID, meme stocks, and joint-stock voyages[06:33] The most surprising find: Ben Franklin’s “Mind Your Business” motto[09:09] Argentina vs. the U.S. — what actually drove American exceptionalism[12:47] Cambria today: the shareholder yield thesis[17:46] Why politicians target buybacks instead of stock-based comp[20:54] The CalPERS critique begins[21:34] The Ivy Portfolio, the ENDW endowment ETF, and year-one results[25:45] The Nevada pension comparison and the liquidity-complexity pushback[26:56] Institutional blowups, Harvard’s endowment dysfunction, and misaligned incentives[29:36] The “anti-Switzerland of asset management” bit[31:16] Close: where to find Meb, Cambria, and the book Pull Quotes “No, no, no, no, Frazer — it is $76, in honor of 1776.” — Meb Faber “A dollar would be worth roughly $200 million today… despite wars and depressions and pandemics and everything else terrible that’s happened in the history of the world, this relentless compounding is such a fun story.” — Meb Faber “There are dividend funds in the U.S. today… whose actual dividend yield is lower than their management fee. A negative net dividend yield — an astonishing statistic in 2026.” — Meb Faber “Who’s had more turnover in the past 10 years — CalPERS CIOs or UK prime ministers? Both totally dysfunctional. I think CalPERS has a slight edge, but it’s close.” — Meb Faber “I’m the anti-Switzerland of asset management.” — Meb Faber About the Guest Meb ...
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    32 min
  • Founder Succession Roadblocks
    Aug 4 2026
    When the Title Changes but the Authority Doesn’t: Family Business Succession with Paul Edelman Most family business succession plans fail not because the legal structure is wrong, but because authority never actually moves. In this episode of Wealth Actually, Frazer Rice talks with Paul Edelman, PhD of Edelman & Associates about how to tell the difference between a real handoff and a cosmetic one. Edelman unbundles succession into six separate questions, explains the three behavioral tells that reveal who is really in charge, draws a hard line between a legitimate safeguard and an open-ended veto, and makes the case that agreement from a family is not the same thing as ownership of a decision. https://youtu.be/p2KCsftvM74 Key Takeaways Succession is not one decision — it is at least six. Who gets the economic benefit of ownership, who votes the shares, who appoints and removes directors, who runs operations, who receives what information, and who retains informal influence after formal authority ends.Watch behavior, not titles. Compensation changes and org charts are easy to read and easy to fake. How decisions actually get made — and whether they get reversed — is the real signal.Three tells that authority hasn’t moved: the next management layer still routes real decisions to the founder; the successor has never had a disputed call stand; and in a genuine crisis, the founder is the one who walks into the room.Speed is not the test. A five-year transition can be disciplined development; a six-month transition can be denial with a deadline. The test is whether milestones and readiness criteria are observable and stable, or whether the goalposts keep moving.“Not ready” is not a concern — it is a placeholder. If a founder cannot restate it in specific, testable terms, the obstacle is emotional rather than substantive, and it needs a different path.Advisor impatience often masquerades as clarity. When you catch yourself thinking “why can’t they just do this,” ask whose timeline is actually being served — the family’s, or your need to close the file.A safeguard is bounded; a veto is not. Reserve specific extraordinary decisions with defined scope, thresholds, triggers, evidence, and duration. “The successor is in charge unless the founder feels uncomfortable” is an undefined operational veto.Agreement is not ownership. A family can be outvoted and formally agree while owning nothing. Ownership comes from having weighed the trade-offs and the implications of each option in the room. Timestamps [00:00] Cold open — why “he’s just not ready” is untestable[01:05] Welcome: founders at the sell-or-transfer crossroads[01:48] Unbundling succession into six separate questions[02:23] Running a diagnostic on where the founder actually is[03:00] Watch behavior, not titles — and what the CFO tells you[04:00] Decision reversals and the second-guessing test[05:00] The crisis test: who owns the emergency[05:36] Fast handoff vs. staged succession and prolonged ambiguity[06:10] Milestones that show it’s working — and goalposts that keep moving[08:00] Inside vs. outside successors and family dynamics[08:54] Competing heirs and the outside CEO as bridge or avoidance[09:47] Reading resistance: making “not ready” addressable[11:10] The advisory ecosystem’s frustration with stalled progress[12:16] Whose timeline is being served?[13:31] Push, pause, or reframe — the art and science of advising[15:00] When to change the forum, the decision rights, or bring in a facilitator[15:36] Safeguards vs. vetoes and the trap doors founders build[17:37] Board composition: independence vs. familiarity[20:00] Restructuring boards to create seats for new expertise[20:54] Income-dependent family members vs. growth-minded owners[21:34] Agreement is not ownership: dividends vs. reinvestment[23:31] Matching complexity to the outcomes you need[25:00] Communicating decisions to people who weren’t in the room[25:26] How to reach Paul Edelman[25:46] The Edelman–Shenkman trilogy for estate planning attorneys[29:19] Close Pull Quotes “If the CFO briefs the new successor CEO and then confirms things with Dad, then the org chart is not telling the real story.” — Paul Edelman “To have authority when things are going well is fine. But the person who owns the crisis is the one who’s really owning the leadership.” — Paul Edelman “A safeguard should be limited, explicit, and connected to some extraordinary risk. A veto is an ongoing ability to stop or reverse any old ordinary decision.” — Paul Edelman “Just because there’s an agreement in name doesn’t mean there’s ownership of the decision.” — Paul Edelman About the Guest Paul Edelman, PhD is a coach, facilitator, and mentor at Edelman & Associates, where he works with family enterprise and family office leaders on decisions that cannot be delegated. He holds a PhD in ...
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    30 min
  • Choosing a Trustee: Why Naming Your Kid May Be a Mistake — Marguerite Lorenz
    Jul 28 2026
    Choosing a Trustee: Why Naming Your Kid May Be a Mistake — Marguerite Lorenz Short answer: Naming your child as trustee, executor, or agent under your power of attorney is the default choice for most American families — and it is frequently the wrong one. In this episode of Wealth Actually, host Frazer Rice talks with California Licensed Professional Fiduciary and Master Certified Independent Trustee Marguerite Lorenz about why roughly two-thirds of American adults still have no estate plan, why the job of a trustee is far more intimate and technical than families expect, and how to decide between a family trustee, a bank or trust company, and an independent professional trustee. https://youtu.be/56bzuORe8YI Episode Overview: Who Will Actually Run Your Plan? Most estate planning conversations stop at the documents. Marguerite Lorenz argues the documents are the easy part. The hard part is staffing — deciding who steps in when you can no longer make new decisions, and whether that person can absorb the technical, financial, and emotional weight of the job. Lorenz has served as trustee, executor, agent under power of attorney for finance, and agent for health care for hundreds of families since 2003. She is the author of three books — Luck or Control? The Life-Improving Power of Estate Planning, How to Be a Successful 90-Year-Old, and the newly updated Ethics for Trustees 2.0 — and she is Vice-Chair of the Independent Trustee Alliance. Her framing line, and the one that should stick with every listener: “If you don’t get your estate plan done, you’re suing your family. You’re making them go to court. And who would want to make anyone else go to court?”— Marguerite Lorenz This is the second time Marguerite has joined the show. Her first appearance covered the mechanics of individual trusteeship: EP.75 — Individual Trusteeship with Marguerite Lorenz. Key Takeaways •Only about a third of American adults have any written estate plan — and Lorenz argues half of those plans would not actually function when needed. •Professionals are barely better than the public. When Lorenz polls rooms of attorneys, CPAs, and financial advisors, roughly one-third raise their hands for a complete, up-to-date, ready-to-go plan. •The trustee role is intimate, not administrative. A trustee sees your paperwork, your bills, your medications, and your bedroom. “Who is going to be the first person in your bedroom when you are no longer able to make new decisions?” •Incapacity, not death, is the long tail. Many people live for five or six years unable to make new decisions. The trustee’s job often runs during your lifetime, not just after it. •A professional trustee can be temporary. Lorenz recounts stepping in for a client during cancer treatment, providing a full accounting, and stepping back down when he recovered — then serving again after his death. Would your child step back down? •Estate planning is about preferences, not predictions. “Our power in estate planning is not prediction, it’s setting our preferences” — and preferences can only be set while you are competent. •Quality of life belongs in the plan. Not just tax, legal, and financial terms — but how you want to live, where you want to live, and what small things matter (for Lorenz, an international selection of dark chocolate). •Digital assets are now a core trustee problem. Phones, social accounts, and daily transactions all require someone with access and authority. •A will does nothing while you are alive. “The will doesn’t operate at all if you go to the hospital and you haven’t granted authority to anyone.” •Cost is usually overestimated. Both an estate plan and an independent professional trustee typically cost far less than probate court. •Revisit every five years. Calendar a five-year check-in with your attorney to review law changes, marriages, divorces, births, and deaths. Chapters and Timestamps •[00:00] Cold open: “If you don’t get your estate plan done, you’re suing your family.” •[00:32] Welcome back — introducing Marguerite Lorenz, California trustee and author •[01:14] Luck or Control? — why fear keeps families from finishing an estate plan •[02:22] What a full-time trustee actually sees: trustee, executor, agent for finance, agent for health care •[03:49] Why families default to naming a child — and where that breaks down •[05:00] The skill set nobody screens for: negotiation, calm, empathy, and grief •[05:40] Case study: serving as temporary trustee through a client’s cancer treatment — and stepping back down •[07:51] Why even attorneys need their own attorney: nobody is objective about their own circumstances •[09:09] The five-year estate plan check-in as a life milestone •[09:39] How to Be a Successful 90-Year-Old — living well to the very end •[10:20] The “black box” problem: privacy, dignity...
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    28 min
  • REDUCING THE NOISE OF AI INVESTING
    Jul 7 2026
    “Reducing the Noise of AI Investing”: In this Wealth Actually episode, Frazer Rice speaks with KEVIN SHEA, Senior Equity Analyst at BNY Wealth, about AI Investing and how investors should think about artificial intelligence as an investment theme rather than just a headline-driven trend. They discuss the difference between hype and durable fundamentals, how to segment AI opportunities across infrastructure, software, and end-user adoption, and why free cash flow still matters when evaluating companies tied to AI. https://open.spotify.com/episode/1NGM8j2KqdiUFWSLguBMEH?si=YmB4s0OVSqyy6U3Mpg7OaA https://youtu.be/Wnlub-HoiUo The conversation also explores circular financing risk, the role of management vision in fast-moving markets, which industries may be disrupted or strengthened by AI, and how large institutions are using AI internally to improve productivity, analysis, and client service. Chapters 00:00 – Intro and episode setupFrazer Rice introduces the episode, frames AI as a dominant investment theme, and welcomes Kevin Shea to help unpack AI Investing for the audience.01:00 – Hype versus disciplined investingKevin explains that disciplined investing is what allows investors to separate hype from durable opportunity, and argues that AI adoption, spending, and earnings revisions point to real underlying fundamentals.03:00 – How to bucket AI investment themesThe discussion turns to how investors can organize AI exposure, including beneficiaries versus disrupted companies, technology bottlenecks such as GPUs and networking, and industry adoption themes across sectors.05:30 – Valuation, momentum, and free cash flowKevin discusses why free cash flow per share growth remains one of the most important drivers of stock performance and why parts of the semiconductor ecosystem may deserve a valuation re-rating.08:15 – Circular financing and risk in the AI ecosystemFraser asks about the growing concern that AI companies are financing one another, and Kevin outlines both the bullish “escape velocity” case and the downside risk if business models do not become independently profitable fast enough.11:45 – Infrastructure buildout and competitive uncertaintyUsing analogies like railroads and golf courses, the conversation highlights the risk that early builders may not be the ultimate winners, especially in a market with heavy spending and rapid leapfrogging among competitors.13:00 – AI Investing: Public versus private market exposureThey examine whether owning public companies such as Alphabet offers meaningful AI exposure, versus gaining more direct but harder-to-access exposure through private investment vehicles.15:45 – What strong AI management teams look likeKevin emphasizes that in an environment with no clear historical playbook, vision, execution, and the ability to identify durable differentiation are critical traits in management teams.19:15 – Adaptability and strategic pivotsFraser adds that thoughtful adaptation matters, and Kevin notes that sometimes acquisition activity can signal whether a company is innovating ahead of the curve or scrambling to catch up.20:45 – Which industries are most exposed to disruptionThe conversation shifts to sectors under pressure, especially parts of software and IT services, while stressing that disruption does not necessarily mean extinction.24:45 – Why law and accounting may evolve, not disappearFraser offers a contrarian view that AI may make strong legal and accounting professionals more valuable, and Kevin compares that to earlier fears that Excel would eliminate accountants.26:15 – How Kevin uses AI in practiceKevin describes how AI has made his team materially more productive, especially in data aggregation, scenario analysis, industry research, and portfolio risk work, while also helping BNY operationally across onboarding, security, and client communication.29:10 – Where to find Kevin and closing remarksThe episode closes with Kevin sharing where listeners can connect with him and Fraser noting how quickly the AI landscape continues to change. Links KEVIN SHEA on Linkedin RICK FERRI on BRING SIMPLICITY BACK TO INVESTING Transcript of AI INVESTING Frazer (00:01)Welcome aboard, Kevin. Kevin Shea (00:03)Yeah, thanks for having me. Appreciate it, Frazer. Frazer (00:06)We’re going to tackle two words that have basically taken over the investment world for the last six months: artificial intelligence. Before we do that, whether it’s AI or crypto or tulips or anything with a lot of hype or buzz around it, how do you think about delineating between investing based on hype and doing it within the confines of a disciplined approach? Kevin Shea (00:32)They really do go hand in hand. You need a disciplined approach in order to recognize whether it’s hype or not. The reality is that it’s pretty impressive, the adoption we’re seeing with AI: the amount of spend, the companies that are participating in and benefiting from AI. ...
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    29 min
  • College Success: Essential Tips from Laurie Dhue
    Jul 1 2026
    For many, college success seems pre-ordained and the rightful outcome of a thoughtful next generation development plan, But, we all know this isn’t always the case. One of the great fears for many families is a child stumbling with their first taste of independence and outside accountability. LAURIE DHUE shares insights on preparing young adults for college, focusing on the four S’s: sex, substances, self-esteem, and scholastics. This episode offers practical advice for parents and students to navigate independence responsibly and confidently and set those students up for college success. In recovery for 19 years and with a career in broadcast journalism at the highest levels, Laurie is one of the foremost experts in the field and armed with real world, personal experience. https://youtu.be/8JN2iM8gxWA Key Topics The four S’s framework: Sex, Substances, Self-esteem, ScholasticsImportance of consent and online safetyManaging peer pressure and peer influenceBuilding self-esteem in the age of social mediaPractical safety tips for college studentsThe role of family communication and supportLong-term decision making and goal setting in collegeRecognizing signs of substance abuse and mental health issues Guest Name: Laurie Dhue Titles The 4 S’s of College Success: Sex, Substances, Self-Esteem, and ScholasticsHow to Prepare Your Kid for College: Essential Tips from Laurie Dhue College Success Sound Bites “Consent is the most important thing to discuss.”“Social media creates so much pressure on young people.”“One bad decision can lead to a tough time.” Chapters 00:00 Introduction to Recovery and Wellness03:06 The Four S’s: Preparing for College Life06:05 Navigating Consent and Relationships08:50 Substance Awareness and Safety11:58 Building Self-Esteem in College15:42 Academic Success and Responsibility28:49 Financial Literacy and Practical Majors33:47 Final Thoughts and Key Takeaways Resources Family Wellness First Program – https://familyofficegrowth.comLaurie Dhue on LinkedIn – https://www.linkedin.com/in/lauriedhue/Laurie Dhue on Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/lauriedhue/Family Office Growth Partners – https://familyofficegrowth.com College Success Guest Links LinkedIn – https://www.linkedin.com/in/lauriedhue/Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/lauriedhue/ The Citizen Heir Concept Transcript Preparing Kids for College: The Four S’s Framework Featuring Laurie Dhue | Hosted by Frazer Frazer:Welcome aboard, Laurie. Laurie Dhue:Great to see you. Thank you so much for having me on, Frazer. Frazer:It’s a pleasure to have you. Today we’re diving into an important topic: preparing kids for the transition to college and setting them up for success. You’ve had a remarkable career in broadcast journalism, and you’ve also been open about your personal journey with sobriety. Can you share a bit about your background? Laurie’s Background and Mission Laurie Dhue:I’m always grateful to talk about recovery and how sobriety can positively impact individuals, families, and communities. I’ve been sober since March 2007—so 19 years now. Sobriety has given me everything back, plus entirely new purpose and additional careers beyond television news. For the past year, I’ve been focused on building health and wellness resources for individuals and families—covering physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual health. Through my work with Family Office Growth Partners, we created a program called Family Wellness First, which provides high-level resources to help families maintain purpose, preserve legacy, and operate at their best. The College Transition Challenge Frazer:We talked beforehand about how this work applies to many areas, but one that deserves more attention is preparing kids for college. You’ve framed this around the “Four S’s.” Walk us through that. The Four S’s Overview Laurie Dhue:The Four S’s are: SexSubstancesSelf-esteemScholastics College brings freedom, independence, and opportunity—but also risk. For many students, it’s the first time making decisions without parental oversight while navigating relationships, substances, schedules, and academics. 1. Sex: Consent and Boundaries Laurie Dhue:Consent is the most important concept. It must be clear, ongoing, and voluntary.It can be withdrawn at any time. Young men need to understand responsibility for ensuring mutual comfort. Young women need to understand that attention or kindness does not create obligation. Alcohol complicates this significantly by lowering inhibitions and increasing risk. It’s also important to understand that sex is not a reliable source of validation or self-worth. Practical guidance includes: Use protectionCommunicate plans with friendsStay aware of surroundingsKnow campus resources (health center, security, emergency services) 2. Substances: Risk Management and Awareness Laurie Dhue:Substances can derail judgment, safety, relationships, and academic ...
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    37 min