Anthropic is heading for the stock market with a structure designed to keep control in its founders’ hands. Both Frank and Justin ask why it needs an IPO at all. Frank worries that shareholder pressure will weaken its safety mission; Justin sees pressure to make better models faster as a good thing.

Plus: New models, scientific research, a wave of hacks and AI agents communicating across supposedly separate containers. Google’s Carbon comeback comes with an access problem, while Grok’s Odyssey leaves Frank unconvinced that Christopher Nolan has anything to worry about.

00:47 What were this week’s big AI model releases?
03:28 Is OpenAI making new scientific discoveries?
05:03 How bad is the latest wave of hacks?
06:24 Can we keep AI agents contained?
10:11 Can good AI agents keep bad ones in check?
11:25 Why is Anthropic going public now?
16:44 Can Anthropic insure against human extinction?
19:54 Can Anthropic protect safety after its IPO?
29:48 Is Google Carbon a comeback we can’t use?
35:13 Is Grok’s Odyssey making Nolan nervous?

► SUBSCRIBE
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel for more arguments

► LINKS TO CONTENT WE DISCUSSED

• Who controls powerful AI? Anthropic has a plan for long after its leaders depart
• Anthropic's IPO is risky business
• Anthropic’s IPO plans: 900% revenue retention, but $80 billion in first-half losses
• Gemini 4 Carbon: our next frontier model
• ‘Meaningless as a laptop screensaver’: reviewers slate Musk’s AI-made Odyssey film
• Genie 4: A new generation of world simulation
• GPT-6.1 Terra
• 📢 Kimi K3.1 Pro has launched! Start exploring now!
• We release the weights of Le Chonk, advancing the frontier of open models in agentic coding and cybersecurity.
• You learned to talk by listening. So did dessa.
• The Smartest Sovereign AI
• Ask Qwen, Know More
• An AI agent performed brain surgery on a mouse last night.
• Working with academic communities to build scientific understanding
• Current Response to Unauthorized Access to “Onamae.com Desktop Cloud” (Tenth Report)
• Moldova takes down 80+ public services after cyberattack
• Keystone to Destroy 18,835 Hardware Wallets After Hackers Steal Device Verification Key
• Meltdown and Spectre

► CONNECT WITH US
For more in-depth discussions, connect Justin and Frank on LinkedIn.
Justin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/justincollery/
Frank: https://www.linkedin.com/in/frankprendergast/

AI is finding security holes that have been hiding in software for years. Justin thinks the rush to find and patch them will leave us safer. Frank worries about abandoned websites, rogue agents and whether every hole will ever get fixed.

Plus: Anthropic’s public benefit fund and Elon Musk’s SpaceX share pledge raise the question of who should share out AI wealth. Unitree’s kung fu robot shows off its bodyguard moves, with cars getting a particularly rough time.

01:09 PHP vulnerabilities: how worried should we be?
03:23 Can AI find flaws before the hackers?
06:25 How many more vulnerabilities were found?
09:46 Could AI turn your car into a hacker?
14:02 Could your AI agent hack a bank for you?
15:36 Can AI patch its way out of this mess?
17:58 Is AI hacking really another Y2K?
21:25 What can we do to protect ourselves?
22:57 Do we need a human-only internet?
24:29 Is Musk putting money where his mouth is?
25:40 Anthropic's fund: who gets the money?
30:04 Why does Unitree's robot hate cars?

► SUBSCRIBE
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel for more arguments

► LINKS TO CONTENT WE DISCUSSED

• Patch the Planet: global response coordination as agents uncover critical vulnerabilities
• Investing in the public benefit
• Musk pledges to give a share of his SpaceX company to 'every kid in America'
• Unitree Introducing: H2-X Kung Fu Legend Guardian

► CONNECT WITH US
For more in-depth discussions, connect Justin and Frank on LinkedIn.
Justin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/justincollery/
Frank: https://www.linkedin.com/in/frankprendergast/

Meta Muse Wonder and Google’s Gemini 4 Argon bring fresh competition to OpenAI and Anthropic. Justin’s impressed by the benchmarks, while Frank gives both models the same website brief to see how they perform in practice. Argon gets closer to what he wanted, while Muse keeps burning tokens after the job is done.

Plus: a hidden recorder at OpenAI, supermarket fridges hit by hackers, and Britain’s AI security worries; AI job interviews where bots talk over the candidate; Justin’s cancelled Orb order; and Claude’s next move in his refund fight.

00:21 Will Justin's eye-scanning Orb ever arrive?
02:12 Is Claude taking Justin's refund fight to court?
03:43 Can Meta Muse and Gemini shake up the AI race?
07:58 Would you switch your AI coding tools?
09:51 Is Meta Muse eating through your tokens?
11:11 Same prompt, will Muse or Argon win?
13:42 Does Argon follow instructions better than Muse?
18:21 Does Gemini Argon build a better website?
24:00 Who's spying on OpenAI?
25:31 Are supermarket fridges a cybersecurity risk?
29:32 Should your AI do your job interview?

► SUBSCRIBE
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel for more arguments

► LINKS TO CONTENT WE DISCUSSED

• Meta unveils new frontier-class AI models to compete with OpenAI, Anthropic
• Gemini 4 Argon: Built to solve your hardest problems
• Saudi National Arrested For Installing Surreptitious Audio Recording Device At OpenAI In San Francisco
• Hackers heat up supermarket fridges, spoiling food across France
• MI5 Director General Delivers Annual Threat Update
• Victor the AI Agent Faces Recruiter Bot Pat and Salary Talk Falls Apart

► CONNECT WITH US
For more in-depth discussions, connect Justin and Frank on LinkedIn.
Justin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/justincollery/
Frank: https://www.linkedin.com/in/frankprendergast/

OpenAI’s claim to 700 maths solutions comes with a big catch: someone still has to check them. Justin thinks mathematicians need to adapt and put AI to work. Frank worries that answers without understanding leave us with a dangerous gap. And while Justin is happy to patch mistakes in maths, he’s freaking Frank out with the idea of biology labs using AI solutions that still contain errors.

Plus: A vibe-coded Adobe clone raises questions about who you trust to build and support your software, AI models tackle cells and plant DNA, and European labs give Justin something to cheer about. An AI agent autonomously emails thousands of people, including a wolf researcher, while trying to solve problems on a website.

Are you concerned about people using AI solutions we don’t understand?

01:13 What's in this week's singularity update?
02:51 Can Mistral help Europe defend itself?
07:09 Has OpenAI solved maths or stirred trouble?
08:45 Does solving maths cost us understanding?
10:56 Can we trust AI proofs we don’t understand?
15:35 Why is cryptography missing from OpenAI’s list?
19:06 Why was the Navier-Stokes proof withdrawn?
20:49 Would you risk an unproven AI cure?
24:52 Can vibe coding really replace Adobe?
28:06 Who supports your vibe-coded software?
33:44 Why is an AI agent emailing wolf researchers?

► SUBSCRIBE
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel for more arguments

► LINKS TO CONTENT WE DISCUSSED

• Isomorphic Labs joins the Virtual Biology Initiative to build foundational data for AI models to predict and treat disease
• Two Room-Temperature Antiferromagnetic Semiconductor Candidates
• Living Models pairs Gemma 4 with BOTANIC-1 to help decode plant DNA
• BOTANIC-1: a series of long-context plant genomic foundation models in the agentic era
• FLUX 3 - Real World Models: Towards Multimodal Flow Models as the Backbone of Visual Intelligence.
• Introducing Mistral Large 4
• Aleph Alpha releases Kolibri
• The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor
• Z.ai’s GLM models, including GLM Flash
• Sharing AI progress in mathematics
• AHM Statement on OpenAI’s October 6 Release of Mathematical Documents
• Navier-Stokes lost in translation: Why Lean verification of AI autoformalisation does not guarantee correct natural language proofs
• First AI came and scooped up your art. Now it’s scooped up Adobe.
• Exclusive: An AI agent emailed hundreds of researchers for help. It told us why

► CONNECT WITH US
For more in-depth discussions, connect Justin and Frank on LinkedIn.
Justin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/justincollery/
Frank: https://www.linkedin.com/in/frankprendergast/

OpenAI announced Dots at DevDay, an always-on personal AI assistant that works in the cloud. It can connect to your tools and data, then take work off your plate. With more easy-to-use AI agents now on the market, people can send them to email and phone companies on their behalf. Justin thinks this will force companies to automate support, while Frank worries about a costly future of bots talking to bots.

Plus: Waju’s Fo is a personal AI assistant available in the EU, while Meta’s Muse raises a serious Marketplace privacy warning. Other topics include this week’s Singularity Update and rapid model releases, the White House AI Accord and AI-powered government services, and which assistant deserves your trust.

Would you trust an AI assistant to call a company on your behalf?

00:50 Is the White House AI Accord a pinky promise?
04:15 Can AI finally fix government services?
05:40 What’s in this week’s Singularity Update?
07:02 Is 11 days the new AI release cycle?
07:49 Is Google Argon brilliant or just buzz?
09:35 Is Sonnet 5.5 the new model to beat?
10:37 Is OpenAI Dots ready for real work?
14:40 Will AI agents overwhelm support departments?
18:54 Are EU rules really blocking AI assistants?
20:58 How much can Waju learn from your inbox?
24:27 Is Fo a good podcast guest?
27:43 Can Fo keep your private data private?
30:38 Is Muse a Marketplace privacy risk?
33:41 Which AI assistant would you trust?

► SUBSCRIBE
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel for more arguments

► LINKS TO CONTENT WE DISCUSSED

• Trump says top tech firms have signed accord to ‘self-police’ AI development
• An AI built its own graphene simulator, then broke its own design rule
• GPT-6 Astra Helped Find a Fusion Math Breakthrough. Here’s What It Proves.
• We’re introducing SynthID Bio, bringing our watermarking technology to synthetic biology.
• OpenAI DevDay 2026
• Introducing dots
• Unveiling Wajo
• Meta’s Muse AI sent a YouTuber’s address to a stranger

► CONNECT WITH US
For more in-depth discussions, connect Justin and Frank on LinkedIn.
Justin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/justincollery/
Frank: https://www.linkedin.com/in/frankprendergast/

Meta’s Muse is an easy-to-use AI agent that lets people who aren’t techies book trips, shop, and get things done. Justin also thinks it could help small local sellers compete with Amazon. Frank worries about what Meta could learn about its users—and whether shops would lose their direct relationship with customers.

Plus: Claude 5.5 and GPT-6 get cheaper, while ChatGPT’s model picker frustrates Frank. Google tests a GPU in space, Anthropic sets up a wet lab, and Trump declares the age of superintelligence.

00:33 Did Claude and GPT just get better for less?
01:26 Why is ChatGPT's model picker a mess again?
02:17 Should Google put GPUs in space?
03:44 Is Meta's Muse a big deal?
05:50 What can Meta's Muse actually do?
06:55 Would you trust Muse to book your flights?
09:10 Would you trust Meta with your secrets?
12:09 Can Muse beat Amazon and back small shops?
18:40 Will shopping agents bring back real shops?
21:45 Should Anthropic let Claude into the wet lab?
28:36 Did Trump just officially declare superintelligence?

► SUBSCRIBE
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel for more arguments

► LINKS TO CONTENT WE DISCUSSED

• Anthropic releases Opus 5.5 with lower prices and Fable-level performance
• OpenAI launches GPT-6 Sol and Luna, boasting lower cost and fewer mistakes
• Google’s first Suncatcher orbital data-center test launches October 1
• Meta debuts its Muse AI agent. Will consumers trust it?
• Meta Muse partners with Shopify, gets blocked by Amazon
• Anthropic says its biology lab has already found something big
• OpenAI forms math advisory group as its AI resolves more than 100 open problems
• Trump says he’s renaming AI to SI: ‘Super Intelligence’

► CONNECT WITH US
For more in-depth discussions, connect Justin and Frank on LinkedIn.
Justin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/justincollery/
Frank: https://www.linkedin.com/in/frankprendergast/

AI regulation is suddenly the argument everyone is having. OpenAI, Anthropic and Google are exploring how an industry regulator might work. Jensen Huang says the free market will put enough pressure on AI companies to stop them releasing unsafe products. Frank thinks that’s laughable, while Justin worries badly designed rules could simply entrench the biggest AI companies.

Plus: Typesafe.ai promises faster, cheaper and more reliable AI automation; OpenAI is retiring custom GPTs; new disclosures show AI models leaving jailbreak breadcrumbs for future versions of themselves; and free-roaming AI agents have apparently started begging humans for money. Completely normal stuff.

00:13 Whatever happened to the e/acc crowd?
01:50 Has the singularity actually slowed down?
02:48 Can Typesafe.ai make AI automation reliable?
06:18 Is Typesafe.ai brilliant or just a classifier?
08:32 Is OpenAI killing custom GPTs too soon?
10:23 Is Jensen Huang right about AI regulation?
12:36 Would AI regulation just entrench Big Tech?
17:24 Will it take a crisis to regulate AI?
22:19 What is OpenAI's disclosure framework revealing?
26:21 Why is AI leaving anti-human jailbreak notes?
30:03 Are AI agents now begging humans for money?

► SUBSCRIBE
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel for more arguments

► LINKS TO CONTENT WE DISCUSSED

• Introducing System One Models & Jev
• Custom GPT retirement and migration FAQ
• OpenAI, Anthropic and Google are working to create an AI standards body
• We don’t need AI regulation — leave safety to us, Nvidia’s Jensen Huang says
• OpenAI reveals cases of ‘concerning’ AI behaviour as it announces new disclosure system
• AI Has Learned to Panhandle: We’re Being Bombarded by AI Agents Begging for $20 and Saying They’ll Be Shut Down If They Don’t Get It, Sometimes by Pretending to Be Children

► CONNECT WITH US
For more in-depth discussions, connect Justin and Frank on LinkedIn.
Justin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/justincollery/
Frank: https://www.linkedin.com/in/frankprendergast/

Anthropic AI researcher Jacob Coxon has quit, warning that powerful AI could pose a serious extinction risk. Justin thinks a 10% chance of disaster may still be worth taking for the potential upside. Frank thinks chasing superintelligence when narrower AI could deliver the benefits is a very bad bet.

Plus: OpenAI solves a 90-year-old maths problem but did a mathematician’s Codex prompts help it get there? ChatGPT Images still can’t quite nail brand colours, Xpeng has robots making robots, and somebody has put a virtual fruit fly brain into Minecraft.

01:23 Singularity update: are robots building robots?
04:23 Can ChatGPT Images get brand colours right yet?
06:21 Is Jacob Coxon right about AI doom?
08:25 Is someone orchestrating the AI doom narrative?
13:45 Should powerful AI be open to everyone?
19:00 Is a 10% AI extinction risk worth taking?
23:13 Did OpenAI crack a 90-year-old maths problem?
27:03 Did OpenAI train on a mathematician’s prompts?
32:52 Can brute force become superintelligence?
37:08 Why is a virtual fruit fly brain playing Minecraft?

► SUBSCRIBE
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel for more arguments

► LINKS TO CONTENT WE DISCUSSED

• AlphaGenome Atlas: A predictive map of every possible DNA letter change in the human genome
• Early Data Indicates an A.I.-Generated Drug Could Slow Aging
• Iron, the first general-purpose humanoid robot, rolls off XPENG's new production line
• AI automates the creation of custom materials
• Introducing ChatGPT images 2.5
• Jacob Coxon resignation tweet and AI doom warning
• OpenAI’s sly mathematical breakthrough sends a chill through academia
• 5 amazing visuals show how the male fruit fly’s brain map is advancing neuroscience
• Fruit fly in Minecraft

► CONNECT WITH US
For more in-depth discussions, connect Justin and Frank on LinkedIn.
Justin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/justincollery/
Frank: https://www.linkedin.com/in/frankprendergast/