Episodi

  • You Can See Everything (2026) — Total Access, Zero Knowledge
    Oct 19 2026
    You Can See Everything (2026)

    Directed by: Nathan Fielder, Lance Oppenheim
    Written by: No writing credit (documentary)
    Starring: Elizabeth Holmes, Nathan Fielder, Billy Evans
    IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt45368240/

    Episode Summary

    In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave discuss You Can See Everything (2026), the A24 documentary in which Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim move in with Elizabeth Holmes and Billy Evans in the 34 days before she reports to prison.

    The discussion explores what Fielder and Oppenheim each bring to the partnership, whether a film this staged still counts as a documentary, how Holmes compares to her portrayal in The Dropout, and whether she is a fraud, delusional, or both. Along the way they compare the film to the work of Errol Morris and Werner Herzog, Primetime, Dick Johnson Is Dead, and Nirvanna the Band the Show the Movie. Both hosts give it five stars, though Michael says the fifth was especially hard won.

    Thematic Discussion

    You Can See Everything explores the gap between access and knowledge: total access, zero knowledge.

    The film gives us more of Elizabeth Holmes than anyone has ever had, at home, on the beach, with her kids, inches from the camera, and she only gets harder to read the closer it gets. Michael and Dave ask whether she is unknowable because people always are, or because she has made herself that way, and whether a filmmaker who openly shapes the story can still get any closer to the truth.

    Timestamps TimeSegment00:00Intro & setup01:26The synopsis and the Elizabeth Holmes story so far05:32The central question: how do you ever really know a person?07:10Directors: Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim13:58Is there a cast in a documentary? Errol Morris, Herzog, and the blurred line26:02Technical analysis: the close-ups, the light, and the pacing34:14Spoiler-free reviews45:31Spoiler section begins47:24The Dropout, Dr. Phyllis Gardner, and fraud vs. delusion56:26The re-creations and what dramatization owes the truth1:10:25Malice, denial, and following the money1:17:20The beach, the kids, and the "you can see everything" text1:21:06Saw a lady in half: David Fear's magic-trick metaphor1:22:06Is this a "pure" documentary? Honesty vs. objectivity1:28:29When re-creations work: Naza and The Voice of Hind Rajab1:32:51Final interpretation1:36:25Closing thoughts Films & Directors Mentioned
    • Primetime (Lance Oppenheim, 2026)
    • Some Kind of Heaven (Lance Oppenheim)
    • Ren Faire (Lance Oppenheim)
    • Nathan for You, The Rehearsal, The Curse (Nathan Fielder)
    • The Dropout (Hulu)
    • Bad Blood (John Carreyrou's book)
    • Errol Morris, Standard Operating Procedure
    • Werner Herzog
    • Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma (Jane Schoenbrun, 2026)
    • Nirvanna the Band the Show the Movie
    • Naza (2026)
    • The Voice of Hind Rajab (Kaouther Ben Hania)
    • Dick Johnson Is Dead (Kirsten Johnson)
    • John Candy: I Like Me
    • Ken Burns, The Civil War
    • Michael Moore
    • Tiger King
    • Trainwreck: Poop Cruise
    • Fyre
    Contact

    Web: https://mindframesfilm.com
    Facebook: Mindframes
    Network: Now Playing Network
    Email: info@mindframesfilm.com

    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    1 ora e 38 min
  • Digger (2026)
    Oct 16 2026
    Digger (2026)

    Directed by: Alejandro G. Iñárritu Written by: Alejandro G. Iñárritu, Alexander Dinelaris, Nicolás Giacobone, Sabina Berman Starring: Tom Cruise, Riz Ahmed, John Goodman, Sandra Hüller, Michael Stuhlbarg, Jesse Plemons IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt31450459/

    Episode Summary

    In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave discuss Digger (2026), Alejandro G. Iñárritu's satirical black comedy starring Tom Cruise as an oil tycoon racing to prove he's humanity's savior before the disaster he caused destroys everything.

    The discussion explores Cruise's prosthetics-heavy turn against type, Iñárritu and Emmanuel Lubezki's bleached, stage-like VistaVision look, Riz Ahmed's grounded performance, and the film's sharply divided reception, before the spoiler section digs into how a culture retells its catastrophes to itself. Along the way they compare the film to Birdman, Dr. Strangelove, Network, The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance and The Producers.

    Thematic Discussion

    Digger explores what we carry: how art turns a shared catastrophe into shared memory, and whether that memory needs to be accurate to do its work.

    The film suggests that coming together to remember, laugh and grieve is its own kind of healing, even when it can't undo the damage, and even when the version we remember is simpler than the truth.

    Timestamps

    Time

    Segment

    03:03

    Intro & setup

    07:20

    Expectations: Tom Cruise against type

    08:54

    Iñárritu's themes and visual style

    15:44

    VistaVision, Lubezki and the gray palette

    17:55

    Who is Digger? The premise and the cast

    23:46

    Spoiler-free reviews

    34:43

    Spoiler section begins

    35:07

    A divided reception: critics vs. audiences

    43:22

    What We Carry: the play within the film

    50:56

    The falling tree

    53:57

    Kenny's speech: accuracy vs. the story

    59:40

    Building cultural memory

    1:04:40

    Final interpretation debate: do shared memories need to be accurate?

    1:20:06

    Closing thoughts

    Films & Directors Mentioned
    • Birdman / Alejandro G. Iñárritu

    • The Revenant / Alejandro G. Iñárritu

    • 21 Grams / Alejandro G. Iñárritu

    • Babel / Alejandro G. Iñárritu

    • Biutiful / Alejandro G. Iñárritu

    • Amores perros / Alejandro G. Iñárritu

    • Dr. Strangelove / Stanley Kubrick

    • Network / Sidney Lumet

    • Magnolia / Paul Thomas Anderson

    • Tropic Thunder / Ben Stiller

    • The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance / John Ford

    • The Producers / Mel Brooks

    • Synecdoche, New York / Charlie Kaufman

    • Don't Look Up / Adam McKay

    • Asteroid City / Wes Anderson

    • Megalopolis / Francis Ford Coppola

    • Schindler's List / Steven Spielberg

    • To Kill a Mockingbird / Robert Mulligan

    • The Lord of the Rings / Peter Jackson

    • Talk to Me / Danny and Michael Philippou

    Contact

    Web: https://mindframesfilm.com Facebook: Mindframes Network: Now Playing Network Email: info@mindframesfilm.com

    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    1 ora e 21 min
  • Primetime (2026) - Is Chris Hansen the Predator?
    Oct 7 2026
    Primetime (2026)

    Directed by: Lance Oppenheim
    Written by: Ajon Singh
    Starring: Robert Pattinson, Skyler Gisondo, Merritt Wever, Creed Bratton, Alex Winter, Anna Faris, Phoebe Bridgers
    IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt34206385/

    Episode Summary

    In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave discuss Primetime (2026), Lance Oppenheim's first fiction feature. Robert Pattinson plays To Catch a Predator host Chris Hansen in a dark comedy that slowly turns into a gothic horror film.

    The discussion covers what it was like to watch To Catch a Predator when it first aired, Oppenheim's recurring interest in performed reality, and Pattinson's performance, which the film frames like a horror villain. Michael and Dave also talk about the network machinery that rewarded the show, and the decoy actor who acts as the audience's conscience. Along the way they compare the film to Elvis, Network, Moby-Dick and Nosferatu.

    Thematic Discussion

    Primetime asks whether Chris Hansen is a man or a monster: a person caught in a ratings machine, or a creature feeding on the darkness he claims to hunt.

    The film never settles whether Hansen has an arc, and the camera treats him both ways. Sometimes it shoots him like a horror monster stalking prey, and sometimes like an ordinary man unwinding over a drink. As the story moves toward its tragic Texas sting, the film gets literally darker and turns into gothic horror. That shift suggests the hunt didn't create the monster so much as reveal it.

    Timestamps TimeSegment00:00Intro & setup: growing up with To Catch a Predator02:59Lance Oppenheim and the film's premise04:39What To Catch a Predator actually was07:50"Pilloried": performed reality in Oppenheim's work10:00Shot like a documentary11:01Robert Pattinson and quiet intensity18:30A fever dream: Primetime and Elvis20:50The network meeting and Network22:38Look and feel: the monster close-up25:31Decoy Dan's crossroads26:41Cinematographer David Bolen and the 16mm texture27:43Structure, score and the creeping horror30:12Spoiler-free reviews39:15Spoiler section begins: Man or Monster?43:08Chasing the whale: Hansen as Ahab44:52Destiny: the producer, Decoy Dan and the SAG card48:00The Bill Conradt tragedy49:53Three readings: human, monster, or human turned monster51:48The film turns to gothic horror53:59Creed Bratton on the plane: "different definitions" of right58:36Final interpretation: how a man turns into a monster1:00:46The bangle, and a look ahead to You Can See Everything1:02:04Closing thoughts Films & Directors Mentioned
    • Primetime (2026) / Lance Oppenheim
    • You Can See Everything (2026) / Lance Oppenheim & Nathan Fielder
    • Some Kind of Heaven (2020) / Lance Oppenheim
    • Ren Faire (2024) / Lance Oppenheim
    • The Python Hunt (2025)
    • Predators (2025) / David Osit
    • Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma (2026) / Jane Schoenbrun
    • Elvis (2022) / Baz Luhrmann
    • Priscilla (2023) / Sofia Coppola
    • Network (1976) / Sidney Lumet
    • Nosferatu (2024) / Robert Eggers
    • The Lighthouse (2019) / Robert Eggers
    • The Drama (2026) / Kristoffer Borgli
    • Mickey 17 (2025) / Bong Joon Ho
    • Twilight (2008) / Catherine Hardwicke
    • One Hour Photo (2002) / Mark Romanek
    • Insomnia (2002) / Christopher Nolan
    • Aladdin (1992) / Ron Clements & John Musker
    • The Social Reckoning (2026)
    • Moby-Dick / Herman Melville (novel)
    Contact

    Web: https://mindframesfilm.com

    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    1 ora e 4 min
  • Spider-Man: Brand New Day
    Aug 1 2026
    Spider-Man: Brand New Day (2026)

    Directed by: Destin Daniel Cretton Written by: Chris McKenna & Erik Sommers (based on the Marvel comic by Stan Lee & Steve Ditko) Starring: Tom Holland, Zendaya, Sadie Sink, Jacob Batalon, Jon Bernthal, Michael Mando, Mark Ruffalo, Liza Colón-Zayas, Florence Pugh IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt22084616/

    Episode Summary

    In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave discuss Spider-Man: Brand New Day (2026), a soft-reboot superhero film that finds Peter Parker fighting crime full-time in a New York that no longer remembers he exists.

    The discussion explores whether the film's quieter, more introspective first act successfully re-energizes a fatigued genre, the wisdom of internalizing Spider-Man's central struggle as his own spider-DNA begins to take over ("spider puberty"), and a plot the hosts agree is overstuffed with characters and motivations. Along the way: Jon Bernthal's softened Punisher, Sadie Sink's tangential villain, an unnecessary Hulk, and some of the most aggressive BMW product placement either host can remember. Reference points include Sam Raimi, The Empire Strikes Back, and the boring-superhero cautionary tales of Superman Returns and Man of Steel.

    On-air verdicts: Dave — 4/5. Michael — 3/5. (Dave really enjoyed it; Michael landed mixed — "10% greatness, 90% mid" — praising the third act while faulting the loaded first two.)

    Thematic Discussion

    Spider-Man: Brand New Day explores loneliness, and the idea that community is vulnerability.

    The film suggests that even with superhuman strength, no one gets through isolation alone — that reaching out, being earnest, and letting people back in is the actual work, and the only real cure. Peter erased himself from everyone he loved to keep them safe; the film argues that choice was the wound, not the protection. Both hosts landed on the thematic point being earned: the melancholy is felt, the reconnection with Ned and MJ is left meaningfully ambiguous rather than reset, and Sadie Sink's character works as a dark-mirror counterpoint — the same loss, but a person who pushes everyone away instead.

    Timestamps TimeSegment00:00Intro & setup02:59The soft reboot: smart move or gimmick?07:28Jon Bernthal's Punisher10:55The cast: Ned, the villains, a Benedict Wong tangent14:36Technical analysis: look, sound, pacing & product placement24:02An overstuffed plot and thin villain motivation25:43Director context: Raimi, Empire, and Cretton's roots27:27Spoiler-free verdicts35:18Spoiler section begins35:29Thematic deep dive: loneliness & connection as vulnerability39:16Is the ending earned? The Ned handshake debate43:51Set design, Jean Grey as counterpoint, "I'm both"48:34The banya scene: playing with vulnerability53:41Closing thoughts & what's next Films & Directors Mentioned
    • Sam Raimi / the Raimi Spider-Man films
    • The Empire Strikes Back
    • Destin Daniel Cretton — Short Term 12, Just Mercy, Shang-Chi
    • Superman Returns, Man of Steel, Godzilla (the "boring superhero" cautionary tales)
    • Bryan Singer — X-Men, X2, Apt Pupil
    • Supergirl, Fantastic Four
    • Iron Man & Watchmen (iconic mask removals)
    • Doctor Strange (Benedict Wong)
    • Baby Driver, The Odyssey, Weapons, Marco Polo, Breaking Bad, Stranger Things
    Contact

    Web: https://mindframesfilm.com Facebook: Mindframes Network: Now Playing Network Email: info@mindframesfilm.com

    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    57 min
  • The Odyssey (2026) — Are the Gods There?
    Jul 24 2026
    The Odyssey (2026) Directed by: Christopher Nolan Written by: Christopher Nolan Starring: Matt Damon, Anne Hathaway, Tom Holland, Robert Pattinson, Charlize Theron, Samantha Morton, Zendaya, Lupita Nyong'o, Elliot Page, John Leguizamo, Benny Safdie, Jon Bernthal, Himesh Patel, Mia Goth, Bill Irwin, Travis Scott IMDB: [IMDB LINK] Episode Summary In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave discuss The Odyssey (2026), Christopher Nolan's three-hour adaptation of Homer — a $250 million epic and the first narrative feature shot entirely on IMAX 70mm. The discussion covers Nolan as an auteur and whether the "never made a bad movie" claim holds up, the practical-effects approach to the Cyclops and Circe, the deliberately cold Northern palette imposed on the Mediterranean, Ludwig Göransson's score, and an ensemble so large the hosts concede they can't get to everyone. After the ratings, the spoiler section turns to the film's central choice: the Olympian gods have been removed while the monsters remain, and what that does to Odysseus' moral agency. Comparisons range across Nolan's own filmography, Troy, The Northman, and the sword-and-sandal epics of the 1950s and '60s. Reviews Michael: 4.5 / 5 — came out thinking four, and it has only grown in his esteem since. Praises the baseline of visual and musical quality, Damon working better as a lead than expected, and a supporting cast that carries every stop on the journey. Docks it for a cast so crowded it distracts, and for an ending too in love with its own moralism. Dave: 4.5 / 5 — would watch it again in a heartbeat. Calls it a film that grabs hold of empire, heroism, reverence, and humility all at once, and rates the separation of gods from monsters as pitch perfect. His one dent in the fender: the film plays a little episodic, a series of very large encounters rather than a single build. Thematic Discussion The Odyssey removes the Olympians but keeps the monsters. Circe, the Sirens, and the Cyclops are all simply part of the natural world here; it's Athena and Zeus who stay shadowy and inferred. Michael's reading is that this absence exists to hand moral agency back to Odysseus — if the gods were visibly steering, his guilt over the Trojan Horse wouldn't be his to carry. That guilt is framed through xenia, the Greek code of hospitality. Odysseus offered a gift that turned out to be murder, and comes to believe that breaking that norm is what set his civilization's collapse in motion. The hosts draw the parallel to the erosion of political and social norms in contemporary America, and to the film's closing turn — the Bronze Age is ending because of the Sea Peoples, and the Greeks realize they are the Sea Peoples. The episode's central disagreement is over Athena. Dave reads her as constructed: she wears the face of a priestess Odysseus watched his own men murder in her temple, and the film is showing how humans build gods out of guilt and the sense that something is sacred. Michael pushes back that the film sustains a genuine ambiguity — the idea that gods appear in human form is planted repeatedly, and the priestess is decapitated at the exact moment Athena's statue is, which leaves open that Odysseus may believe they killed a god. He points to the same ambiguity in the Cyclops' cry to Poseidon, which some of the crew claim to hear and neither Odysseus nor the audience does. Neither host resolves it, and both prefer it that way. Michael's position is that the ambiguity is the answer rather than the absence of one — something underpins their world that they don't fully see and are damaging anyway, whether that's Zeus and Poseidon or simply decency and the value of human life. Dave, arriving from a position of religious faith, says he likes that Odysseus has to live in the same uncertain world the rest of us do. The structural evidence they land on: Homer ends with a deus ex machina, Athena descending to stop the cycle of revenge. Nolan cuts it. Nobody intervenes, so Odysseus abdicates, gives the throne to Telemachus, and sails west with Penelope — a change that hands the ending's moral weight entirely to the man. Timestamps TimeSegment00:00Intro & setup05:08Nolan's filmography — is he an auteur?08:51Practical filmmaking and visual style09:37IMAX 70mm and the limits of the format14:40Hoyte van Hoytema17:16Why the Mediterranean looks cold19:39Ludwig Göransson's score25:20Travis Scott, the bard, and the casting discourse28:56The ensemble39:39Reviews & ratings49:56Spoiler section begins52:18Xenia and the collapse of norms54:50The gods and moral agency56:12The Athena reveal1:01:46The case for ambiguity1:05:03"We're the Sea Peoples"1:09:02The ending Nolan changed1:19:36Final interpretation debate — are the gods there?1:26:49Closing thoughts Films & Directors Mentioned Memento — Christopher NolanInception — Christopher NolanThe Prestige — Christopher NolanInterstellar — Christopher NolanDunkirk — Christopher NolanTenet — ...
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    1 ora e 29 min
  • Episode 121 : Disclosure Day
    Jun 25 2026
    Mindframes Show Notes Episode 121 — Disclosure Day (2026)

    Directed by: Steven Spielberg Written by: David Koepp Starring: Emily Blunt, Josh O'Connor, Colin Firth, Colman Domingo, Eve Hewson, Wyatt Russell IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt15047880/

    Special guest: Tarek Fayoumi (movieswithtarek.com), director of the Chicago Independent Film Critics.

    Episode Summary

    In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave — joined by returning guest Tarek Fayoumi — discuss Disclosure Day (2026), Steven Spielberg's return to the alien genre and his first big sci-fi swing since War of the Worlds.

    The conversation works through Spielberg's recurring obsessions (renegade heroes, shadowy government forces, ordinary people swept into something enormous), Janusz Kamiński's return to the diffused-light, lens-flare look, and John Williams' 30th collaboration with the director — before splitting hard over whether the film's hopeful thesis actually lands. Comparisons run from Close Encounters of the Third Kind, E.T., and War of the Worlds to Contact, Minority Report, and Coppola's Megalopolis as a fellow "late master with something to say."

    Verdicts split three ways: Michael 2.5/5, Dave 3/5, Tarek 4/4.

    Thematic Discussion

    Disclosure Day asks whether an undeniable, truthful image can still unite people in a cynical age — Brian Tallerico's "undeniable image" framing, run through the show's central question: not is there proof? but does proof still work on us?

    Michael argues the truthful image isn't wounded but dead — a shared reality the film is nostalgic for, but one that no longer functions when people deny what they're shown. Dave counters that the film's real hope is empathy and human-to-human connection replacing the broken image, while conceding Spielberg doesn't earn that buy-in the way his early work did. The film ends not on a revelation but on Margaret turning to the camera, saying "Listen," and cutting to black — proof getting humanity to the threshold, with faith and empathy left to carry it the rest of the way.

    Timestamps

    Note: recording was split into two files; Part 2 times below assume the parts run continuously (Part 2 offset by ~50:03). Verify against the stitched audio.

    TimeSegment00:15Intro & setup; welcoming guest Tarek Fayoumi02:33Spielberg as a director — recurring themes03:21Premise & the Wardex setup (spoiler-free)08:43Return to the alien genre vs. his recent dramas10:01Cinematography — Kamiński, lens flares, the "awe" look28:12John Williams' 30th collaboration; film & score preservation31:17Spoiler-free reviews begin31:47Michael's review (2.5/5)38:47Dave's review (3/5)43:02Tarek's review (4/4)~45:10Spoiler section begins~45:42The alien reveal & the decades of "disclosure" footage~55:27Thematic debate: empathy vs. the image~56:08"The truthful image is dead" — Michael's core position~60:17The ending: "Listen" and the cut to black~74:31Closing thoughts — can we still believe in a unifying image?~74:56Next episode tease Films & Directors Mentioned
    • Close Encounters of the Third Kind (Steven Spielberg)
    • E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (Steven Spielberg)
    • War of the Worlds (Steven Spielberg)
    • A.I. Artificial Intelligence (Steven Spielberg)
    • Minority Report (Steven Spielberg)
    • Jaws (Steven Spielberg)
    • Schindler's List / Saving Private Ryan (Steven Spielberg)
    • The Terminal / Catch Me If You Can (Steven Spielberg)
    • The Fabelmans / West Side Story (Steven Spielberg)
    • Jurassic Park / Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (David Koepp & Spielberg)
    • Contact (Robert Zemeckis / Carl Sagan)
    • Explorers (Joe Dante)
    • 2001: A Space Odyssey (Stanley Kubrick)
    • Megalopolis (Francis Ford Coppola)
    • Super 8 (J.J. Abrams)
    • Watching the Skies (Norwegian sci-fi)
    • Poltergeist / Gremlins (Spielberg-produced, 1980s)
    • The Outer Limits — "The Architects of Fear"
    Contact

    Web: https://mindframesfilm.com Facebook: Mindframes Network: Now Playing Network Email: info@mindframesfilm.com

    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    1 ora e 19 min
  • Episode 120 - Obsession
    Jun 19 2026
    Mindframes Show Notes Obsession (2026)

    Directed by: Curry Barker Written by: Curry Barker Starring: Michael Johnston, Inde Navarrette, Cooper Tomlinson, Megan Lawless, Andy Richter IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt37287335/

    Episode Summary

    In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave dig into Obsession (2026), Curry Barker's micro-budget feature debut that turned into one of the biggest horror phenomenons in years — a $750K film bought for $15 million out of TIFF that went on to gross well over $148 million worldwide, growing at the box office in consecutive weekends rather than declining.

    The discussion explores the film's monkey's-paw premise, its working-class Gen Z setting, the moral architecture of Bear's wish, and the central question of whether Bear is the film's actual villain — while comparing the film to Weapons, Pearl, Get Out, The Witch, and Isaac Asimov's Foundation and Empire.

    Thematic Discussion

    Obsession explores consent and agency — what happens when desire is granted without consent.

    The film suggests that Bear doesn't earn or deserve Nikki's love; he eliminates her will and replaces it with his own. As Curry Barker has put it, "love is earned, not demanded," and "any time you wish for something, it's probably going to be selfish." The true engine of the horror isn't the curse twisting the wish — it's that the wish works exactly as asked.

    On-air verdict — Is Bear the villain? Both hosts landed on no. He's flawed, selfish, and prolongs the harm once he knows better, but he's the story's antagonist rather than its villain — if anyone is the "real" villain, it's the cursed object itself. Michael's framing: not every flawed person is a villain, and the film is more interesting because its characters are layered rather than purely good or evil.

    On-air verdict — the ending. Dave correctly intuited that Nikki originally killed herself in an earlier draft — that actually was Barker's original Romeo-and-Juliet mutual-suicide ending, before his playwright father pushed him toward the survival cut used in the final film. Michael argued the survival ending is more thematically persuasive: if the theme is one person's coercion of another's agency, the resolution should be Nikki's, not a mutual destruction that treats the harm as shared. Bear's selfishness has to die for Nikki to live.

    A live reference worth flagging for listeners: Michael cited Naomi Serpell's New Yorker piece "The New Literalism" (March 2025) as a framework for questioning how intentionally — and how literally — modern horror handles its themes of trauma and control.

    ⏱️ Timestamps TimeSegment00:01Intro & setup00:03Director background — Curry Barker, box office story00:09Cinematography & cast discussion00:30Reviews & ratings00:41⚠️ Spoiler section begins — "What would you wish for?"00:44Thematic discussion: consent and agency00:45Is Bear the villain?01:01The ending — survival vs. the original Romeo & Juliet cut01:13The New Literalism / intentionality debate01:22Closing thoughts & next episode 🎞️ Films & Directors Mentioned
    • Weapons / Barbarian (Zach Cregger)
    • Pearl (Ti West / Mia Goth) — Barker has cited this as a major influence
    • Get Out (Jordan Peele)
    • The Witch (Robert Eggers)
    • Backrooms (Kane Parsons)
    • Hurry Up Tomorrow (Jenna Ortega)
    • Isaac Asimov's Foundation and Empire
    📬 Contact

    🌐 https://mindframesfilm.com 📘 Facebook: Mindframes 🎧 Now Playing Network ✉️ info@mindframesfilm.com

    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    1 ora e 18 min
  • Episode 119 - Backrooms
    Jun 6 2026
    Backrooms (2026) Directed by: Kane Parsons Written by: Will Sudick Starring: Chiwetel Ejiofor, Renate Reinsve, Mark Duplass, Finn Bennett, Lukita Maxwell IMDB: Backrooms (2026) Episode Summary In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and Dave discuss Backrooms (2026), an A24 horror film directed by 20-year-old YouTube filmmaker and wunderkind Kane Parsons — believed to be the youngest person to ever direct a widely released feature film. The discussion covers the film's expansion of the internet liminal space phenomenon into a feature-length narrative, its Tarkovsky-esque atmosphere, and the remarkable work of cinematographer Jeremy Cox and production designer Danny Vermette in bringing 30,000 square feet of meticulously constructed sets to life. The conversation digs deep into why liminal spaces resonate so powerfully with contemporary audiences — and with Gen Z in particular — framing the backrooms not just as a horror setting but as a cultural symptom of a society in uneasy transition. Both hosts award the film five stars, with Michael calling it the best film he's seen this year. 🧠 Thematic Discussion Backrooms explores the psychology of liminal space — transitional, empty environments that feel familiar yet deeply wrong — and uses them as an externalization of Clark's inability to move on from divorce, grief, and unresolved anger. The film suggests that the backrooms are not merely a supernatural threat, but a space that reflects what we bring into it. Clark, living inside his furniture store rather than moving forward with his life, is already inhabiting a kind of liminal space before he ever finds the portal. The backrooms literalize his psychological stasis. The key scene where Mary stops being a detached therapist and tells Clark plainly that the problem is not where he is but that he refuses to move — functions as the film's emotional thesis. More broadly, the episode argues that our collective fascination with liminal spaces is less allegory or conscious metaphor and more a psychological aesthetic symptom: these spaces — fluorescent-lit, carpeted, emptied of purpose — resonate because they look like the places our society is abandoning, and feel like the threshold we are all standing on. The backrooms are what happens when transitional space becomes permanent home. ⏱️ Timestamps TimeSegment00:00Intro & welcome~02:00Introducing Backrooms and Kane Parsons~04:00Plot overview & synopsis~05:30The liminal space / backrooms internet phenomenon~07:30Cast discussion — Chiwetel Ejiofor, Renate Reinsve, Mark Duplass, Finn Bennett, Lukita Maxwell~15:30Technical analysis — sound design, cinematography, production design~26:00⚠️ Spoiler-free reviews — Michael & Dave both award 5 stars~35:00⚠️ SPOILER SECTION BEGINS~35:00Defining liminal spaces — film history, David Lynch, The Shining, Stalker, Annihilation~43:00Why liminal spaces scare us — uncanny valley, psychological resonance~49:00Why now? Cultural anxiety, societal transition, the doom-scrolling generation~54:00Clark's arc — psychological stasis, avoidance, the backrooms as mirror~60:00Mary's arc — confronting pain as the path out~62:00The scientists / MRI company — and fears for Backrooms 2~68:00A24, Neon, Cannes, and closing tangents~70:00Closing thoughts & contact info 🎞️ Films & Directors Mentioned Stalker (1979) — Andrei TarkovskySolaris (1972) — Andrei TarkovskyAnnihilation (2018) — Alex GarlandMen (2022) — Alex GarlandThe Shining (1980) — Stanley KubrickSkinamarink (2022) — Kyle Edward BallExit 8 — referenced as liminal space filmLost Highway (1997) — David LynchMulholland Drive (2001) — David LynchTwin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me / Twin Peaks (series) — David LynchLong Legs (2024) — Oz PerkinsThe Monkey (2025) — Oz PerkinsKeeper — Oz PerkinsThe Black Coat's Daughter / February (2015) — Oz PerkinsHocum — referenced for comparison (sound design and scare level)Presence (2025) — referenced for scare level comparisonLife of Chuck (2024) — referencedCreep (2014) — Mark Duplass12 Years a Slave (2013) — referenced re: Chiwetel EjioforSentimental Value (2025) — referenced re: Renate ReinsveWorst Person in the World (2021) — referenced re: Renate ReinsveFjord (2026) — referenced; won Palme d'Or at CannesBoys Go to Jupiter (2025) — referenced re: young filmmakersPearl (2022) / X / MaXXXine — Ti West trilogy, referenced re: A24 sequelsTalk to Me 2 — referenced re: A24 sequelsScary Stories to Tell in the Dark (2019) — André ØvredalThe Autopsy of Jane Doe (2016) — André ØvredalVoyage of the Demeter (2023) — André Øvredal 📬 Contact 🌐 https://mindframesfilm.com 📘 Facebook: Mindframes Movies 🎧 Now Playing Network — nowplayingpodcast.net ✉️ info@mindframesfilm.com
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    1 ora e 9 min