Goverment Experiments Exposed copertina

Goverment Experiments Exposed

Goverment Experiments Exposed

Di: OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT
Ascolta gratuitamente

Offerte di stagione | 0,99 €/mese per i primi 3 mesi

A seguire 9,99 €/mese – si applicano condizioni. Puoi disdire mensilmente.
Classified Experiments opens with a mayonnaise jar sitting on a laboratory shelf, a preserved brain floating inside it, and a pathologist's signature on the label like it was nothing unusual at all.

This is a narrated documentary podcast, no host, no interviews, just a full story reconstructed episode by episode from case files, court records, and the paper trails governments tried to bury. Each episode follows one classified program from its quiet beginning to the moment it broke into the open, tracing the names, the memos, and the bodies left behind. You get the timeline, the people who signed off, and the ones who paid for it.

The show digs into human experiments conducted under military and medical cover, the secret experiments run in institutions that answered to no one, and the classified experiments that treated consent as an inconvenience. Some episodes trace a single death, like twelve children killed by a bottle of medicine that should never have left the shelf, no crime ever filed, just silence and a grave. Others follow a program for decades, watching how these experiments kept running while bureaucracies protected themselves long after the science stopped making sense. The throughline is always the same question: who decided these experiments were acceptable, and who decided no one would ever be told.

New episodes drop regularly, each one a self-contained story with its own ending, so you can start anywhere and still walk away with the full weight of what happened. Subscribe to Classified Experiments and follow the paper trail from the first quiet decision to the moment the truth about these experiments finally surfaces.Copyright OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT Fantascienza
Episodi
  • The nineteen‑page manual that made plausible deniability collapse

    The nineteen‑page manual that made plausible deniability collapse
    Oct 2 2026
    A 19-page manual on how to kill a human being was found in the files of a CIA operation, despite a doctrine of plausible deniability. This document challenges the very system designed to hide such actions.

    The nineteen‑page manual that made plausible deniability collapse

    This episode explores the origins and implications of plausible deniability, a system designed to obscure government responsibility for covert operations. It delves into how this architectural choice in modern statecraft was built and by whom.

    Topic: Plausible Deniability
    Document: 19-page manual
    Operation: PBSuccess
    Year: 1954
    Location: National Security Archive

    - The manual was discovered within the training files of Operation PBSuccess, the 1954 CIA operation that overthrew the government of Guatemala.
    - The concept of managed absence, where honest individuals are removed before a decision, was described by Victorian mathematician Charles Babbage.
    - NSC 10/2, issued on June 18, 1948, authorized covert operations and required that US government responsibility for them not be evident.
    - Allen Dulles, who would become CIA director, was the first official to publicly use the phrase "plausibly deniable."
    - Former CIA Director Richard Helms told the Church Committee in 1975 that "nobody wants to embarrass a President of the United States."

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    18 min
  • The Injection They Knew Was Poisonous - Mothers Left to Die

    The Injection They Knew Was Poisonous - Mothers Left to Die
    Oct 1 2026
    A Dublin lab knew anti-D batches were contaminated in 1977, but injections continued-what happened next?

    The Injection They Knew Was Poisonous - Mothers Left to Die

    In this episode, we follow the sequence of decisions, missed recalls, and the emergence of a group of women who refused to stay silent about infections from anti-D blood product. What choices did institutions make once contamination was known, and how did women like Brigid McCole respond?

    Person: Brigid Ellen McCole
    Date: 25 July 1977 (instruction to stop using Patient X’s plasma)
    Location: Blood Transfusion Service Board, Dublin; maternity wards across Ireland
    Event: Contaminated anti-D batches delivered and administered
    Group: Positive Action (formed May 1994)

    - A single instruction from a BTSB biochemist ordered that Patient X’s plasma be stopped on 25 July 1977, but contaminated anti-D batches were already packed and sent to maternity wards.
    - Anti-D was a routine postnatal injection given across Ireland since 1969; in 1977 it was trusted and administrated without suspicion.
    - A 16 December 1991 fax from Dr. Jeremy Garson at Middlesex Hospital reported Patient X-linked samples tested positive for hepatitis C, prompting questions that went unanswered by the BTSB.
    - Internal BTSB review in 1994 linked new hepatitis C positive donors-mostly women in a narrow age range with similar reproductive histories-to the 1976-77 anti-D batches and notified the Health Minister on 17 February 1994.
    - Women infected sought each other out after the BTSB refused to connect them; by May 1994 twenty-five women met in Dublin and formed Positive Action to organize and pursue accountability.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    18 min
  • The hammer strike behind the infant's head unmade the claim that fear was innate

    The hammer strike behind the infant's head unmade the claim that fear was innate
    Sep 30 2026
    A Johns Hopkins infant reaches for a white rat-then a hammer strikes behind his head; did behaviorism manufacture an emotion or merely nudge a reflex?

    The hammer strike behind the infant's head unmade the claim that fear was innate

    In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events recorded in the surviving film and original report that made "Little Albert" the center of a century-long debate. We trace the study’s methods, the people in the room, and the conflicting clues about who the infant might have been - and ask what that history does to the claim that fear can be created in a lab.

    Person: John B. Watson
    Person: Rosalie Rayner
    Subject: "Albert B." (infant)
    Location: Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
    Date: 1920 (initial assessments); 1920 (conditioning sessions)

    - A nine-month-old infant identified only as "Albert B." was assessed with a white rat, rabbit, dog, masks, cotton and wool and showed no fear responses.
    - At eleven months, experimenters paired the rat with a sudden hammer strike on a suspended steel bar directly behind the infant’s head to elicit startle responses.
    - After repeated pairings, the infant began to whimper, tremble, turn away, and later withdrew from the rat when it was presented alone.
    - Subsequent sessions tested generalization: the infant reacted to a rabbit, a furry dog, a fur coat, and a Santa Claus mask trimmed with cotton, though Watson noted the effect was "neither strong nor lasting."
    - Two different men have been proposed as the surviving identities of the infant in the film, one who died at six and one who lived to eighty-seven, creating a real but unresolved contradiction in the historical record.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    17 min
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Ancora nessuna recensione