Episodi

  • The nineteen‑page manual that made plausible deniability collapse

    The nineteen‑page manual that made plausible deniability collapse
    Oct 2 2026
    A 19-page manual on how to kill a human being was found in the files of a CIA operation, despite a doctrine of plausible deniability. This document challenges the very system designed to hide such actions.

    The nineteen‑page manual that made plausible deniability collapse

    This episode explores the origins and implications of plausible deniability, a system designed to obscure government responsibility for covert operations. It delves into how this architectural choice in modern statecraft was built and by whom.

    Topic: Plausible Deniability
    Document: 19-page manual
    Operation: PBSuccess
    Year: 1954
    Location: National Security Archive

    - The manual was discovered within the training files of Operation PBSuccess, the 1954 CIA operation that overthrew the government of Guatemala.
    - The concept of managed absence, where honest individuals are removed before a decision, was described by Victorian mathematician Charles Babbage.
    - NSC 10/2, issued on June 18, 1948, authorized covert operations and required that US government responsibility for them not be evident.
    - Allen Dulles, who would become CIA director, was the first official to publicly use the phrase "plausibly deniable."
    - Former CIA Director Richard Helms told the Church Committee in 1975 that "nobody wants to embarrass a President of the United States."

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    18 min
  • The Injection They Knew Was Poisonous - Mothers Left to Die

    The Injection They Knew Was Poisonous - Mothers Left to Die
    Oct 1 2026
    A Dublin lab knew anti-D batches were contaminated in 1977, but injections continued-what happened next?

    The Injection They Knew Was Poisonous - Mothers Left to Die

    In this episode, we follow the sequence of decisions, missed recalls, and the emergence of a group of women who refused to stay silent about infections from anti-D blood product. What choices did institutions make once contamination was known, and how did women like Brigid McCole respond?

    Person: Brigid Ellen McCole
    Date: 25 July 1977 (instruction to stop using Patient X’s plasma)
    Location: Blood Transfusion Service Board, Dublin; maternity wards across Ireland
    Event: Contaminated anti-D batches delivered and administered
    Group: Positive Action (formed May 1994)

    - A single instruction from a BTSB biochemist ordered that Patient X’s plasma be stopped on 25 July 1977, but contaminated anti-D batches were already packed and sent to maternity wards.
    - Anti-D was a routine postnatal injection given across Ireland since 1969; in 1977 it was trusted and administrated without suspicion.
    - A 16 December 1991 fax from Dr. Jeremy Garson at Middlesex Hospital reported Patient X-linked samples tested positive for hepatitis C, prompting questions that went unanswered by the BTSB.
    - Internal BTSB review in 1994 linked new hepatitis C positive donors-mostly women in a narrow age range with similar reproductive histories-to the 1976-77 anti-D batches and notified the Health Minister on 17 February 1994.
    - Women infected sought each other out after the BTSB refused to connect them; by May 1994 twenty-five women met in Dublin and formed Positive Action to organize and pursue accountability.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    18 min
  • The hammer strike behind the infant's head unmade the claim that fear was innate

    The hammer strike behind the infant's head unmade the claim that fear was innate
    Sep 30 2026
    A Johns Hopkins infant reaches for a white rat-then a hammer strikes behind his head; did behaviorism manufacture an emotion or merely nudge a reflex?

    The hammer strike behind the infant's head unmade the claim that fear was innate

    In this episode, we lay out the sequence of events recorded in the surviving film and original report that made "Little Albert" the center of a century-long debate. We trace the study’s methods, the people in the room, and the conflicting clues about who the infant might have been - and ask what that history does to the claim that fear can be created in a lab.

    Person: John B. Watson
    Person: Rosalie Rayner
    Subject: "Albert B." (infant)
    Location: Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
    Date: 1920 (initial assessments); 1920 (conditioning sessions)

    - A nine-month-old infant identified only as "Albert B." was assessed with a white rat, rabbit, dog, masks, cotton and wool and showed no fear responses.
    - At eleven months, experimenters paired the rat with a sudden hammer strike on a suspended steel bar directly behind the infant’s head to elicit startle responses.
    - After repeated pairings, the infant began to whimper, tremble, turn away, and later withdrew from the rat when it was presented alone.
    - Subsequent sessions tested generalization: the infant reacted to a rabbit, a furry dog, a fur coat, and a Santa Claus mask trimmed with cotton, though Watson noted the effect was "neither strong nor lasting."
    - Two different men have been proposed as the surviving identities of the infant in the film, one who died at six and one who lived to eighty-seven, creating a real but unresolved contradiction in the historical record.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    17 min
  • The consent forms that never told parents what children would see

    The consent forms that never told parents what children would see
    Sep 29 2026
    A Stanford psychologist had adults beat a clown doll in front of preschoolers-what would the children do?

    The consent forms that never told parents what children would see

    In this episode, we follow the setup and procedures behind the classic Stanford Bobo Doll Studies and the choices researchers made in designing the sessions. What did the experiment’s staged playrooms, scripted adults, and consent forms leave in the children’s minds?

    Person: Albert Bandura
    Date: 1961-1965
    Location: Stanford University nursery school
    Participants: 234 children ages 3-6
    Topic: Bobo Doll Studies experimental procedure

    - Researchers scripted adult models to act aggressively toward a five-foot weighted Bobo doll while filmed through a one-way mirror.
    - Parents signed permission forms that did not describe what their children would witness or do during the studies.
    - Each child was first led into a room with attractive toys, then deliberately frustrated by being told the toys were reserved for others.
    - After induced frustration, the child was placed alone with the Bobo doll for 20 minutes while observers recorded predefined aggressive behaviors.
    - Results were recorded, categorized, and compared across groups who saw aggressive models, passive models, or no model, with stronger imitation of same-sex models.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    17 min
  • The photograph Queen Ingrid posed for hid that the children were never orphans

    The photograph Queen Ingrid posed for hid that the children were never orphans
    Sep 28 2026
    A Danish queen posed with Greenlandic children - but the photograph hid the families they actually had. Who were they?

    The photograph Queen Ingrid posed for hid that the children were never orphans

    In this episode, we trace the plan, the people and the policies behind a 1951 program that moved Greenlandic children to Denmark. We follow how the children were selected, transported, placed and silenced, and ask what that photograph and the choices around it really documented.

    Person: Helene Thiesen
    Event: Little Danes Experiment
    Date: May 1951
    Location: MS Disko; Fedgaarden; Nuuk
    Country: Denmark/Greenland

    - Planners specified children around six years old, no impairments, and crucially labeled as orphans to justify removal.
    - Greenlandic priests were tasked with finding candidates and discovered there were not enough actual orphans.
    - Twenty-two children boarded the MS Disko; only six were true orphans and one was nine years old.
    - After arrival, the children were quarantined for the entire summer at Fedgaarden where Queen Ingrid posed for the photograph.
    - With an unfinished orphanage in Nuuk, authorities placed the children in Danish foster homes and enforced Danish-only language rules.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    15 min
  • The ledger that called her "Anarcha Westcott" erased her name

    The ledger that called her "Anarcha Westcott" erased her name
    Sep 27 2026
    An enslaved woman becomes the subject of thirty operations by J. Marion Sims in Alabama, her name erased in medical ledgers and ledgers of ownership.

    The ledger that called her "Anarcha Westcott" erased her name

    In this episode, we follow the documented trail of one enslaved woman whose body became central to a surgical breakthrough and whose identity splinters across records. What do the surviving ledgers, hospital registers, and census entries actually tell us about who she was and what happened to her?

    Person: J. Marion Sims
    Person: William Lewis Maury
    Event: Thirty operations for vesicovaginal and rectovaginal fistula
    Date: December 21, 1856 (hospital admission)
    Location: Montgomery, Alabama; New York City; King George County, Virginia

    - A child appears in Sims’s writings first as an assistant during a bloodletting, recorded as “a little mulatto girl,” not by name.
    - Census and death records suggest she was closer to thirteen at the labor that caused her fistulas, though Sims later recorded her age as about seventeen.
    - Sims operated thirty times on her across years in Alabama, using opium for analgesia while ether and chloroform were not used on these women.
    - Sims published the surgical technique in January 1852 without naming her; subsequent medical literature described the procedure, not the patient.
    - An 1856 hospital register lists her as property of William Lewis Maury and records her admission for fistula repair and discharge as cured, after which she disappears from the documented record.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    18 min
  • The FAA's eight daily sonic booms cracked the city's windows

    The FAA's eight daily sonic booms cracked the city's windows
    Sep 26 2026
    An FAA supersonic test turns Oklahoma City into a daily target of eight sonic booms, shattering windows and testing how much a city can endure.

    The FAA's eight daily sonic booms cracked the city's windows

    In this episode, you’ll hear how federal planners ran six months of supersonic tests over Oklahoma City and what the city experienced as a result. We follow the schedule, the aircraft, the damage reports, and the bureaucratic decisions that set the experiment in motion - and ask what the city was owed.

    Person: Federal Aviation Administration
    Date: February 3-July 30, 1964
    Location: Oklahoma City
    Event: Operation Bongo II supersonic test program
    Damage claims processed: 4,629

    - FAA selected Oklahoma City for proximity to the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center and Tinker Air Force Base, noting the population as “relatively tolerant.”
    - Tests scheduled eight booms per day, starting about 7 a.m., over 26 weeks with two pressure phases (1-1.5 and 1.5-2 psf).
    - Air Force jets used included F-104s, B-58s, F-101s, and F-106s flying prescribed corridors repeatedly.
    - Within 14 weeks, 147 windows broke in two downtown bank buildings, contradicting the FAA’s glass-shattering assurances.
    - A total of 9,594 building-damage complaints were filed; 4,629 formal damage claims were processed by the FAA.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    20 min
  • The Consent That Kept Him Trapped: How Dan Died for Data

    The Consent That Kept Him Trapped: How Dan Died for Data
    Sep 25 2026
    A psychotic twenty-six-year-old signs consent for a drug trial the day a judge frees him - what happens next?

    The Consent That Kept Him Trapped: How Dan Died for Data

    In this episode, we follow the documented chain of decisions that placed Dan Markingson - recently released from involuntary commitment - into a university-run pharmaceutical trial and track the contact, calls, and reports that flowed through the people responsible for him. How did consent, clinical roles, and financial incentives shape the path his care took?

    Person: Dan Markingson
    Date: November 2003-April 2004
    Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
    Case: CAFÉ (Comparison of Atypicals in First Episode) clinical trial
    Person: Mary Weiss

    - A judge suspended Dan’s involuntary commitment; the stay required compliance with an aftercare plan that left enrollment in the CAFÉ trial as the practical alternative to locked hospitalization.
    - Dr. Stephen Olson was both Dan’s treating physician and the principal investigator of the CAFÉ study recruiting first-episode psychosis patients like Dan.
    - On November 21, 2003, study coordinator Jean Kenney obtained Dan’s signature on a six-page consent form while his mother was not present and 48 hours after a court order had declared him incapable of directing his care.
    - The CAFÉ consent form described participation as voluntary and withdrawable but did not disclose the investigator’s dual role or how AstraZeneca’s prorated payments rewarded subject retention over clinical outcomes.
    - Between December 2003 and April 2004, Mary Weiss repeatedly called Theo House and study staff with safety concerns, culminating in a voicemail asking, “Do we have to wait until he kills himself,” while the study continued.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    16 min