Study the steam oven category deeply enough and a problem emerges: almost every brand leads with the same talking points. Steam cooking. Convection. Automatic programs. Reheating. Healthy cooking. And when salespeople can't find the real differences, they invent ones that aren't big enough. Customers feel it immediately — and retreat to the path of least resistance.

Jon noticed this compression while building Steam Cod University content with Ben, and it led to a different kind of episode. Not a 1v1 — a full category hierarchy.

At the top sits Gaggenau — and it isn't close. The 400 Series Combi Steam Oven offers selectable humidity levels (0, 30, 60, 80, 100%) combined with precision convection across a wide range. That's not a feature. That's a different cooking philosophy. A vegetable, bread, fish, and roast all need different environments. Gaggenau lets you shape that environment deliberately instead of treating steam as an on/off mode. Add the plumbed architecture and you have a product built around cooking control at a level the rest of the category doesn't match. Selling it from a feature checklist misses the point entirely.

Miele earns the second position through depth of steam ownership intelligence. Wolf's redesign earned it the third spot — before the redesign, it would have landed in the compression group. Jon explains what changed and why it matters.

After those three, the category largely compresses. That doesn't mean the other brands are bad products. But salespeople need to be careful not to overstate separations that aren't clearly there — because customers always feel when you're forcing a difference that isn't big enough.

🎙️ Hosted by Shannon O'Hara and Jon Beresford | The Steel Codcast 🔔 New episode every day of the week. Rate and subscribe wherever you listen.

The Steel Cod Retail Council is back for July, and Jon Beresford is breaking down three questions that generated some genuinely surprising results.

First up: if you had to build your entire floor around one luxury cooking brand — Monogram, Blue Star, or SKS — what would the council choose? Monogram took it, and Jon explains why that result makes complete sense given what the independent channel has been doing quietly for the past couple of years. He also unpacks the Blue Star ceiling conversation and makes a thoughtful case for why retailers who commit to SKS now might look very smart down the road — the same way early Wolf and Sub-Zero believers did.

The second question asked which category has the biggest opportunity to explode over the next 12–18 months. Induction dominated, and Jon highlights the specific development he thinks the industry is seriously underestimating: battery technology that removes the last real infrastructure objection from the conversation. But the real talking point was laundry — a category almost nobody predicted, and one Jon admits he initially couldn't see until he started reading the council's reasoning around all-in-one machines and the way new builds are changing the game.

And then outdoor. The council was asked which premium outdoor brand is most at risk, and DCS absorbed most of the heat. Jon gives DCS real credit — this is a brand with genuine heritage and a story worth telling — but he's honest about what the council is seeing. Heston shows up in a different way: great product, real quality, but brand recognition that hasn't yet caught up to the price point. And Broil King's appearance was the one that genuinely caught Jon off guard — a mid-tier brand getting squeezed from both directions at once.

He closes with a reframe worth sitting with: in a category built entirely on desire, the question is never "why should they buy it" — it's "why would they."

New episodes every day. Rate and subscribe wherever you listen.

Referenced this episode: → Julie Burns / Monogram Interview — https://www.podbean.com/eas/pb-nsimf-1af9d49 → Composer with Tim Ketchum — https://www.podbean.com/eas/pb-qmshm-1af16ec → Qoldusion / Residential Walk-In Refrigeration — https://www.podbean.com/eas/pb-uhxzq-1aec6e4

Walk into any appliance showroom today and you'll find the word "luxury" on products at $800, at $2,000, at $5,000, and at $15,000. Every one of them carrying the same language — premium, professional, elevated, sophisticated. Jon Beresford opens this Saturday deep dive by saying that confusion is costing the independent channel something significant — and that the independent dealer is the only person in the market positioned to actually fix it.

He traces exactly how luxury lost its meaning through what he calls price point creep: manufacturers with a successful premium line that starts building tiers below it, borrowing the aesthetic while compromising the engineering, calling it luxury because it looks luxury and sits on the same floor. Every manufacturer starts making the same calculation. The word ends up spanning such a vast range of products and price points that it stops functioning as a meaningful descriptor at all. At this point, Jon says, luxury basically means anything above entry level — which means almost nothing.

Steel Cod's definition of genuine luxury comes down to three components. The first is longevity — not warranty language, but actual field performance in year 12 the way it performed in year one. The second is ownership experience — not just how the product feels to use, but the entire relationship with the brand after the sale: how easy service is, how available parts are, how the brand treats a customer when something goes wrong. A product that costs $10,000 and delivers a $500 service experience when something breaks isn't a luxury product — it's just a price point. The third is performance ceiling — genuine luxury products have a ceiling a customer can grow and learn into for years. A product built to a lower standard hits that ceiling fast. The customer files the experience under "I paid a lot of money and I'm not sure it was worth it." That feeling is the opposite of what luxury is supposed to deliver.

Jon names both versions of the problem: the brand that earned luxury decades ago but whose standards didn't survive acquisitions and cost reduction cycles, and the brand that positioned itself in the luxury tier without ever earning it. He calls "affordable luxury" an oxymoron — affordable doesn't describe a price point, it describes where corners were cut.

He closes with the structural argument for why the independent dealer is the only person in the entire ecosystem capable of having this conversation honestly — and why the dealer who commits to it is building a reputation that compounds in referrals, repeat customers, and trust in ways that no competitor can replicate.

New episodes every day. Rate and subscribe wherever you listen.