• Title: Looking to 2026: The Future of Cinema

• Focus: Industry trends, cultural anxieties, and the most anticipated films of 2026

• IMDb: N/A (discussion episode)

In this episode of Mindframes, Michael and David look ahead to 2026 and ask a deceptively simple question: what kind of year will it be for movies? Coming off what they consider a creatively rich—but commercially uneven—2025, the conversation explores the tension between artistic vitality and economic uncertainty. From box office struggles and bloated marketing budgets to shifting audience habits and global cinema's rising influence, the hosts balance cautious concern with genuine excitement for what's coming next.

Theme 1 – Cinema Thriving Creatively, Struggling Economically
While 2025 delivered exceptional films and performances, many acclaimed movies failed to connect with large audiences. The episode interrogates whether this gap reflects streaming habits, rising costs, marketing excess, or deeper cultural fatigue with the theatrical model.

Theme 2 – Event Movies vs. Personal Cinema
The hosts contrast massive IP-driven releases (Avengers: Doomsday, Dune: Part Three, Toy Story 5) with filmmaker-driven projects from auteurs like Nolan, Villeneuve, Gerwig, Eggers, Spielberg, and Iñárritu—questioning whether spectacle alone can sustain moviegoing culture.

Theme 3 – Hope Through Global & Generational Shifts
Despite storm clouds, there are signs of renewal: Gen Z showing renewed interest in theaters, international films breaking through, and genre cinema thriving on modest budgets. The episode argues that cinema isn't dying—it's recalibrating.

• Michael Cockerill

• David Canfield

• 🌐 https://mindframesfilm.com

• 📘 Facebook: Mindframes Film

• 🎧 Now Playing Network

• ✉️ info@mindframesfilm.com

Best Films of 2025 — Trends, Themes, and the State of Cinema

This is a multi‑film recap episode.

Primary Shared Films Discussed:

• Weapons

• Eddington

• Hamnet

• Sinners

• One Battle After Another

• Train Dreams

• Universal Language

• Frankenstein

Additional Films Referenced:

• It Was Just an Accident

• Ebony and Ivory

• Sirât

• The Zone of Interest

• Everything Everywhere All at Once

• Avatar: Fire and Ash

In this year‑end episode of Mindframes, Michael Cockerill and David Canfield look back on what they agree was one of the strongest years in cinema in recent memory. Rather than ranking films strictly by quality, the discussion centers on how 2025's movies reflected the emotional, cultural, and political realities of the moment. The hosts explore major technical trends—such as the return of controlled formalism, the renewed importance of sound design, and a more disciplined use of CGI—before turning to deeper thematic currents running through the year's films. Across genres, 2025 cinema repeatedly grappled with loss, systemic failure, alienation, and the fragile possibility of hope. The episode concludes with personal picks, shared favorites, and a defense of films that dared to resist cynicism through human connection and formal craft.

Many of the standout films of 2025 rejected frenetic camera work in favor of classical composition—locked‑off shots, wide frames, symmetry, and negative space. This stylistic restraint allowed emotion to emerge gradually rather than being chased by the camera. Films like Hamnet exemplified how formal discipline can deepen emotional resonance and restore cinematic patience.

Sound design emerged as a dominant expressive tool, often prioritizing diegetic and off‑screen audio over traditional sweeping scores. Silence itself became a source of tension, especially in horror, where absence of sound replaced musical cues. This trend reflects both creative evolution and the challenge of balancing theatrical sound design with home viewing habits.

Across genres, filmmakers returned obsessively to stories of missing or dead children, institutional collapse, and moral ambiguity. These narratives frame despair as a defining emotional condition of the era, while asking whether hope can survive systemic pressure. Some films embraced the darkness; others, like Universal Language, quietly resisted it through small acts of human connection.

• Michael Cockerill

• David Canfield

• 🌐 https://mindframesfilm.com

• 📘 Facebook

• 🎧 Now Playing Network

• ✉️ info@mindframesfilm.com

Mindframes is a sometimes half‑assed but always wholehearted conversation about film, culture, and the moments that shape us.

🎮 Film Discussed: Hamnet (2025)
🗓️ Release Date: December 13, 2025
🎧 Hosts: Michael & David

• 00:00 – Intro
  Michael and David introduce the show and kick off discussion of Hamnet, Chloe Zhao's adaptation of Maggie O'Farrell's novel.

• 00:48 – Film Overview
  Chloe Zhao's recent directorial triumph, premiere at TIFF, her filmography from Nomadland to Eternals, and Hamnet's awards buzz.

• 02:23 – Plot & Themes
  The story centers on Agnes Hathaway and her marriage to Shakespeare, their shared grief over their son Hamnet's death, and how personal loss influenced artistic creation.

• 04:11 – Cinematography by Lukasz Zal
  Discussion of Zal's previous work (The Zone of Interest, Loving Vincent), his visual storytelling, use of natural light, and the film's stunning forest imagery.

• 06:15 – Book Origins and Historical Context
  Exploration of Maggie O'Farrell's novel, historical liberties, Shakespeare's personal life, and their dramatized relationship.

• 10:00 – Jesse Buckley as Agnes
  Performance praise and her emotional depth, evolution from earlier roles (I'm Thinking of Ending Things, The Lost Daughter).

• 17:00 – Paul Mescal as Shakespeare
  A restrained but complex portrayal. Debate over his reception compared to Buckley's, and reflections on artistic introspection.

• 23:00 – Visual Language & Direction
  Comparison to Zone of Interest, Chloe Zhao's style (landscapes, close-ups), forest symbolism, and interiority of grief.

• 30:00 – Pacing & Emotional Resonance
  Defense of the film's slow pace, importance of patient visuals, and building emotional payoff.

• 35:00 – Art vs Family Sacrifice
  Broader film trends about artistic sacrifice, complexity of Shakespeare as a father, and cultural reflections.

• 45:00 – Critical Response & Awards Speculation
  David and Michael reflect on Oscars potential, critical responses, and "devastating" as a recurring descriptor.

• 47:00 – Third Act & Theatrical Closure
  A spoiler-free nod to the finale's emotional crescendo, visual poetry, and synthesis of nature and performance.

• 50:00 – Final Reviews
  Michael gives it 5 stars, calls it a career-best for Buckley; David praises its emotional impact and timeless resonance.

• Theme(s): Grief, art as legacy, sacrifice, nature vs language, emotional communication, family and connection.

• Mindframe(s) Rating: 5/5 haunted honeybees 🐝

• Listener Question: How do you process grief—through nature, through storytelling, or something else entirely?

Directed by: Yorgos Lanthimos
Written by: Will Tracy and Jang Joon-hwan

Starring: Emma Stone, Jesse Plemons, Aiden Delvis, Alicia Silverstone, Stavros Halkias
Cinematography: Not specified (shot on VistaVision, 35mm, Willcam equipment)
Release: 2025
IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt12300742/

In this episode, Dave and Michael dive deep into Bugonia, the latest satirical and enigmatic offering from Yorgos Lanthimos. With a plot centering on two conspiracy-minded men who kidnap a powerful CEO they believe to be an alien, the hosts explore Lanthimos' signature blend of absurdism, social critique, and tonal precision. The conversation touches on thematic elements like power hierarchies, detachment from humanity, and the inescapable dynamics of empathy. Throughout, Dave and Michael reflect on Lanthimos' evolving filmography, his standout collaborations with Emma Stone, and the fascinating psychological and visual language of the film.

Bugonia offers a searing satire of corporate detachment, power inversion, and societal alienation. The film explores how humanity is distorted by institutional power, media messaging, and emotional denial. Through its bizarre plot and aesthetic choices, it challenges viewers to empathize with morally gray characters and question the systems that produce them.

• Website: mindframesfilm.com

• Facebook: facebook.com/mindframesmovies

• Network: Now Playing Network

• Email: info@mindframesfilm.com

Directed by: Guillermo del Toro
Written by: Guillermo del Toro, based on the novel by Mary Shelley
Starring: Oscar Isaac (Victor Frankenstein), Jacob Elordi (The Creature), Christoph Waltz (Von Klemper), Mia Goth (Elizabeth/Claire Frankenstein), Charles Dance, Ralph Ineson, and David Bradley
Cinematography: Dan Laustsen
Release: 2025 (Netflix)
IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1312221/

Dave and Michael explore Guillermo del Toro's long-awaited adaptation of Frankenstein — a film that blends gothic horror, Catholic melodrama, and emotional fantasy. They discuss del Toro's lifelong fascination with monsters, the film's lavish design, and how it rehumanizes one of literature's most tragic creations. The conversation dives into themes of creation, responsibility, and the eternal bond between monster and maker, while connecting the film to the long cinematic history of Frankenstein.

The hosts highlight del Toro's Frankenstein as both a love letter to monster cinema and a meditation on faith, class, and parenthood filtered through a Latin American Catholic lens.
They note how del Toro's signature gothic romanticism tempers horror with empathy, positioning the creature as both victim and philosopher.
Ultimately, they frame the film as a study of what it means to create—and to be responsible for what we bring into the world.

• Website: mindframesfilm.com

• Facebook: facebook.com/mindframesmovies

• Network: Now Playing Network

• Email: Reach the team via their assistant "Abby Normal" at info@mindframesfilm.com

• Director: Ronan Day-Lewis (feature debut)

• Writers: Ronan Day-Lewis & Daniel Day-Lewis

• Cinematography: Ben Fordsman

• Main Cast:

  • Daniel Day-Lewis as Ray

  • Sean Bean as Jem

  • Samantha Morton as Nessa Stoker

  • Samuel Bottomley as Brian Stoker

  • Safiya Oakley-Green as Hattie

00:00 – Intro & Overview
Michael and Dave introduce Anemone, a moody psychological drama and feature debut by Ronan Day-Lewis, starring his father Daniel Day-Lewis. They tease the film's atmospheric visuals, layered performances, and thematic heft.

01:25 – Plot Summary
Dave summarizes the plot: Ray (Daniel Day-Lewis), a haunted recluse in rural England, is visited by his brother Jem (Sean Bean), prompting a confrontation with past traumas, estrangement, and the question of familial reconciliation.

02:50 – Visual Aesthetic & Cinematography
The hosts explore the film's striking use of natural light, magical realism, and "damp, green" Northern England landscapes, captured by cinematographer Ben Fordsman. The weather acts as a near-character in the story.

05:50 – Symbolism & Style
Michael critiques some symbolic elements and magical realism as heavy-handed. Dave defends their emotional resonance. Both agree the film shows great directorial promise despite moments of overreach.

08:52 – Cast Discussion

• Daniel Day-Lewis: Praised for his intensity, though some monologues feel forced due to script limitations. Potential Oscar buzz.

• Sean Bean: Commended for nuance and believability in a rare emotionally rich role.

• Samantha Morton: Strong but underwritten role as the estranged wife.

• Supporting Cast: Critique of thinly developed side characters, including son Brian and friend Hattie—sparking a broader conversation on representation in modern cinema.

31:00 – Reviews

• Dave: ★★★☆☆ – "Solid film with strong performances; a bit drawn out but emotionally effective."

• Michael: ★★★½☆ – "Visually compelling with a stacked cast. First-time director missteps but shows real talent."

39:00 – Thematic Deep Dive: Masculine Emotional Suppression
The second half focuses on the film's central theme: male emotional repression—especially within British working-class culture. Ray's emotional barricades, military trauma, and the generational consequences are dissected.

46:00 – Symbolism of the Anemone Flower
Michael interprets the title's metaphor: a subtle inheritance from the father, symbolizing buried emotion and unprocessed trauma blooming in isolation.

52:00 – Comparative Film Talk
Mentions of The Lighthouse, Tree of Life, Phantom Thread, and The Witch as points of stylistic and thematic comparison.

59:00 – Closing Banter
Discussion of upcoming episodes (likely Frankenstein by Guillermo del Toro), humorous talk of "OnlyVans" and critic calendars, and shoutouts to listeners and fellow reviewers.

Director: Paul Thomas Anderson
Cinematographer: Michael Bauman
Composer: Jonny Greenwood

Cast:

• Leonardo DiCaprio as Bob Ferguson

• Chase Infinity as Willa Ferguson

• Sean Penn as Colonel Lockjaw

• Benicio Del Toro as Sensei Luis

• Regina Hall as Mother Helena

Film Discussed: One Battle After Another (Dir. Paul Thomas Anderson)
Hosts: Michael Cockerill & Dave Canfield
Runtime: ~3 hours
Theme: Resistance, legacy, generational change

00:00–02:30 – 🎙 Intro & Film Overview
Michael and Dave introduce PTA's latest film, outlining the premise, setting, and stylistic tone.

02:30–10:15 – 🎥 Visual Style & Cinematography
A deep dive into Michael Bauman's kinetic visuals, PTA's aesthetic trademarks, and how imperfections amplify tension.

10:15–17:00 – 🎶 Sound & Musical Trends
Discussion on loud, eclectic music as a storytelling device and how this film navigates current audio mixing trends.

17:00–25:00 – 🌟 Cast & Performances
Praise for Leonardo DiCaprio, Sean Penn, Chase Infinity, and Benicio del Toro. Emphasis on character depth and casting synergy.

26:00–33:00 – ⭐ Reviews & Final Verdicts
Both hosts award 5 stars, highlighting rhythm, emotional weight, and thematic power.

33:00–56:00 – 🧠 Themes: Resistance & Generational Struggle (Spoilers)
Exploration of resistance as a timeless cycle, the burden of political fatigue, and the promise of youth-led change.

56:00–End – 🧵 Closing Reflections
Analogies to classic films (E.T., Pan's Labyrinth), personal insights on activism, and why this is a capital "I" important film.

Would you like this exported as a PDF or formatted for your website backend?

Fifty boys start walking, three warnings get you shot, and somehow we are the ones out of breath. In this week's Mindframes, Michael and Dave march into The Long Walk—where Cooper Hoffman broods, David Jonsson keeps the heart beating, and Mark Hamill cosplays as your least favorite PE teacher. Along the way we debate whether dystopias should come with better snacks, why America's obsessed with televised misery, and if ★★★/5 means we survived… or just need new shoes.

Basic Facts

• 00:00:14 — Cold open & show intro

• 00:01:49 — Plot setup: rules of the Walk; Garraty & McVries

• 00:04:01 — "Keep the focus on cast": stripped-down craft, performances lead

• 00:08:55 — Why Hoffman & Jonsson elevate "a tough adaptation"

• 00:12:22 — Michael's review: the Walk as real antagonist; issues with the Major

• 00:21:01 — Michael's rating: ★★★/5

• 00:21:12 — Dave's review: resonance with present-day pessimism; skeletal dystopia

• 00:28:14 — Casting types, shifting identities on the road

• 00:30:40 — Mark Hamill thoughts vs. Life of Chuck praise

• 00:32:30 — Theme segment: "the spectacle of violence" in America

• 00:44:14 — Vietnam-era media, body-count reporting, long-walk parallels

• 00:48:08 — Phones, 24/7 news, desensitization

• 00:53:23 — Dignity stripped on camera; do we still see people?

• 01:01:13 — Film vs. book crowds; keeping focus on the walkers

• 01:03:53 — Wrap on causes vs. enablers of violence; no easy answers