Send us a text

A death game with loot drops shouldn’t feel this human, but Dungeon Crawler Carl sneaks past your guard with jokes and then hits you with a mirror. We dive into the LitRPG’s wild premise—Earth flattened by aliens, survivors herded into a televised dungeon—and explore why Carl and Princess Donut work as more than a meme. Their bond isn’t comic relief; it’s the engine of a found family story about dignity, tenderness and the cost of staying human when survival is monetized.

We unpack how the book skewers late-stage capitalism and our culture of spectacle without turning into a lecture. From ratings agents who coach contestants on being “more entertaining” to a boss encounter that exposes how media flattens people into stereotypes, the satire lands because the characters care. Carl’s mantra—“you will not break me”—becomes a refusal to surrender empathy to an algorithm. We also dig into the ethical knots: NPCs with memories and personality, an AI that turns stat sheets into character, and the uneasy line between performance and personhood.

If you’re new to LitRPG, we cover the basics and why this one reads fast: punchy worldbuilding, action that moves, and humor that serves the story instead of smothering it. If you’re already deep in the fandom, we trade notes on the series scope, upcoming adaptations, and where to go next with recommendations that share Carl’s blend of heart and bite. Along the way, we celebrate the audiobook performance that brings every beat to life and talk about why a laser-eyed cat can carry more truth than a dozen “serious” novels.

Press play, then tell us what moral line you’d draw inside a system that turns pain into content. If the show resonated, follow, rate, and share with a friend who loves big ideas wrapped in absolute chaos—we read everything you send and it helps more curious listeners find the pod.

Send us a text

What if a family legacy of witchcraft demanded more than survival—what if it demanded a reckoning? We dive into Kirsten Miller’s The Women of Wild Hill, where two estranged sisters collide with a centuries-old haunting, a thorny prophecy, and a world that keeps pretending it isn’t on fire. The scale is bigger than a single villain; it’s the machinery of patriarchy, wealth, and extraction, and the question is brutal: do you fix a rigged system from within, or do you burn it down and start over?

We compare the intimate vigilante justice of The Change with Wild Hill’s push toward systemic upheaval, unpacking how lineage shifts the story from finding power to stewarding it. Brigid’s death-sight, Phoebe’s healing, and Sybil’s kitchen magic reveal three distinct expressions of agency—one burdened by finality, one built for repair, and one that turns care into strategy. Along the way, we trace the novel’s ecofeminist spine: storms herding the sisters home, a house kept by a wronged ancestor, and "the Old One" nudging fate with wind and quake when humans refuse to listen.

The moral terrain isn’t tidy. We wrestle with prophecy as both guide and cage, with poison as a cure that hurts before it heals, and with the cost of toppling men who are monstrous in boardrooms rather than alleys. Are flawed women still fit to lead a revolution? Can rage be refined into a compass? By the end, we land on a hard truth: solidarity, not solitary heroics, moves the needle, and sometimes the clean solution is the fantasy that keeps everything broken.

If this conversation sparks something in you, hit follow, share it with a friend who loves witchy fiction with teeth, and leave a review telling us whether you’d choose reform or reckoning—and why.

Send us a text

What if the moment you were told to disappear was the moment you became impossible to ignore? We take on Kirsten Miller’s The Change, a sharp, propulsive thriller where three midlife women transform grief, rage, and invisibility into a force that refuses to back down. Think murder mystery meets feminist awakening: Harriet roots into the earth and grows dangerous wisdom, Nessa hears the dead and demands peace, and Jo channels fury into fire and strength. Together, they confront a string of crimes that echo real-world headlines and expose why justice so often fails the girls who need it most.

We get personal about aging, power, and the myths that tell women to stay small. From the maiden–mother–crone archetype to the labels that police women’s voices—hysterical, bitchy, too much—we unpack how language, culture, and institutions shape who gets heard and who gets erased. Along the way, we challenge the “man-hating” critique with nuance: the book includes strong male allies and loving partners while shining a bright light on predators and enablers. The focus isn’t hating men; it’s interrogating power, accountability, and the systems that protect abuse.

Then we wade into the thorny debate: when, if ever, is vigilante justice justified? The Change removes ambiguity about guilt to force a harder look at the gap between legal process and moral clarity, especially when wealth and influence block the truth. We don’t romanticize going outside the law, but we do ask listeners to sit with discomfort, question inherited norms, and consider what real reform would require. If you care about feminist fiction, crime stories with heart, and conversations that burn through euphemism, this one will stay with you.

If this resonated, tap follow, share with a friend who loves bold books, and leave a review to help more curious readers find the show.

Send us a text

A coffin scratches, a sister rises, and nothing about identity or desire looks the same afterward. We take you inside Johanna von Vein’s Blood on Her Tongue, a gothic horror that swaps fangs for a parasite and turns the genre’s mirror toward patriarchy, power, and the right to survive. From the moody boglands to a drawing room where medicine becomes a muzzle, we trace how the novel uses body horror to ask a sharper question: if memory, love, and history remain, who has the authority to say a person is gone?

We start with the classic setup—letters, a mysterious decline, a death that doesn’t hold—then dig into the rupture that follows. Lucy, long eclipsed by her twin, faces a new Sara who is louder, hungrier, and truer to the life she could never claim. That hunger is more than flesh; it’s voice, sex, and selfhood in a time that calls women’s agency an illness. We talk through the book’s feminist spine: doctors who diagnose disobedience, a husband who confuses need with entitlement, and a social order that teaches women to apologize for breathing. The novel argues that vampirism isn’t a creature so much as a system that feeds on your future while calling it love.

Along the way, we explore queerness as truth under siege—Aunt Adelaide’s erased companionship, Sara and Katya’s stifled devotion, and Lucy’s desire exploited in grief—and how the parasite reframes “monstrous” as a demand to live. We press on the hardest moral knot: when survival requires harm, what counts as justice, and who gets to name the monster? By the end, we land on a fierce, messy liberation where personhood is a flame carried forward, not a body locked in place.

If you’re into gothic fiction, feminist horror, identity philosophy, queer narratives, and books that leave you arguing with the lights on, hit play, subscribe for our next reads, and leave a review to tell us where you stand on the final moral choice.

Send us a text

A legend everyone thinks they know becomes a story many of us needed. We take a fresh, unflinching look at Ayana Gray’s I Medusa and follow the arc from girl to survivor, from pawn to priestess, and from silence to a voice strong enough to call out gods and men alike. What happens when a culture trains a young woman to be ignorant—and then blames her for not knowing? That question drives our conversation through the book’s most searing themes: grooming disguised as romance, consent ignored when power feels threatened, and the way institutions will defend their image over their people.

We start with the home that failed Medusa—an abusive father, a checked-out mother, and immortal sisters who choose not to prepare their mortal sibling for the world. In Athens, trials set by Athena reveal a rare moral clarity: compassion as courage, justice as action, and service as strength. Yet when Poseidon exerts status and familiarity to breach Medusa’s boundaries, the reckoning lands where it always seems to—on the woman. We challenge Athena’s role as “wisdom” within a patriarchal order, unpack how victim-blaming survives by flattening nuance, and trace how Gray turns Perseus into a footnote to keep the spotlight on the woman, not the weapon.