Send us a text

What if a family legacy of witchcraft demanded more than survival—what if it demanded a reckoning? We dive into Kirsten Miller’s The Women of Wild Hill, where two estranged sisters collide with a centuries-old haunting, a thorny prophecy, and a world that keeps pretending it isn’t on fire. The scale is bigger than a single villain; it’s the machinery of patriarchy, wealth, and extraction, and the question is brutal: do you fix a rigged system from within, or do you burn it down and start over?

We compare the intimate vigilante justice of The Change with Wild Hill’s push toward systemic upheaval, unpacking how lineage shifts the story from finding power to stewarding it. Brigid’s death-sight, Phoebe’s healing, and Sybil’s kitchen magic reveal three distinct expressions of agency—one burdened by finality, one built for repair, and one that turns care into strategy. Along the way, we trace the novel’s ecofeminist spine: storms herding the sisters home, a house kept by a wronged ancestor, and "the Old One" nudging fate with wind and quake when humans refuse to listen.

The moral terrain isn’t tidy. We wrestle with prophecy as both guide and cage, with poison as a cure that hurts before it heals, and with the cost of toppling men who are monstrous in boardrooms rather than alleys. Are flawed women still fit to lead a revolution? Can rage be refined into a compass? By the end, we land on a hard truth: solidarity, not solitary heroics, moves the needle, and sometimes the clean solution is the fantasy that keeps everything broken.

If this conversation sparks something in you, hit follow, share it with a friend who loves witchy fiction with teeth, and leave a review telling us whether you’d choose reform or reckoning—and why.

Send us a text

What if the moment you were told to disappear was the moment you became impossible to ignore? We take on Kirsten Miller’s The Change, a sharp, propulsive thriller where three midlife women transform grief, rage, and invisibility into a force that refuses to back down. Think murder mystery meets feminist awakening: Harriet roots into the earth and grows dangerous wisdom, Nessa hears the dead and demands peace, and Jo channels fury into fire and strength. Together, they confront a string of crimes that echo real-world headlines and expose why justice so often fails the girls who need it most.

We get personal about aging, power, and the myths that tell women to stay small. From the maiden–mother–crone archetype to the labels that police women’s voices—hysterical, bitchy, too much—we unpack how language, culture, and institutions shape who gets heard and who gets erased. Along the way, we challenge the “man-hating” critique with nuance: the book includes strong male allies and loving partners while shining a bright light on predators and enablers. The focus isn’t hating men; it’s interrogating power, accountability, and the systems that protect abuse.

Then we wade into the thorny debate: when, if ever, is vigilante justice justified? The Change removes ambiguity about guilt to force a harder look at the gap between legal process and moral clarity, especially when wealth and influence block the truth. We don’t romanticize going outside the law, but we do ask listeners to sit with discomfort, question inherited norms, and consider what real reform would require. If you care about feminist fiction, crime stories with heart, and conversations that burn through euphemism, this one will stay with you.

If this resonated, tap follow, share with a friend who loves bold books, and leave a review to help more curious readers find the show.

Send us a text

A coffin scratches, a sister rises, and nothing about identity or desire looks the same afterward. We take you inside Johanna von Vein’s Blood on Her Tongue, a gothic horror that swaps fangs for a parasite and turns the genre’s mirror toward patriarchy, power, and the right to survive. From the moody boglands to a drawing room where medicine becomes a muzzle, we trace how the novel uses body horror to ask a sharper question: if memory, love, and history remain, who has the authority to say a person is gone?

We start with the classic setup—letters, a mysterious decline, a death that doesn’t hold—then dig into the rupture that follows. Lucy, long eclipsed by her twin, faces a new Sara who is louder, hungrier, and truer to the life she could never claim. That hunger is more than flesh; it’s voice, sex, and selfhood in a time that calls women’s agency an illness. We talk through the book’s feminist spine: doctors who diagnose disobedience, a husband who confuses need with entitlement, and a social order that teaches women to apologize for breathing. The novel argues that vampirism isn’t a creature so much as a system that feeds on your future while calling it love.

Along the way, we explore queerness as truth under siege—Aunt Adelaide’s erased companionship, Sara and Katya’s stifled devotion, and Lucy’s desire exploited in grief—and how the parasite reframes “monstrous” as a demand to live. We press on the hardest moral knot: when survival requires harm, what counts as justice, and who gets to name the monster? By the end, we land on a fierce, messy liberation where personhood is a flame carried forward, not a body locked in place.

If you’re into gothic fiction, feminist horror, identity philosophy, queer narratives, and books that leave you arguing with the lights on, hit play, subscribe for our next reads, and leave a review to tell us where you stand on the final moral choice.