Historical Medicine copertina

Historical Medicine

Historical Medicine

Di: OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT
Ascolta gratuitamente

Offerte di stagione | 0,99 €/mese per i primi 3 mesi

A seguire 9,99 €/mese – si applicano condizioni. Puoi disdire mensilmente.
A proposito di questo titolo
 Historical medicine is a record of brilliant guesses, catastrophic certainties, and cures that killed. Doctors bled presidents to death with total confidence, and laughed at the first man who told them to wash their hands. This show tells the true stories of historical medicine.

Each episode reconstructs one case in full, cinematic detail: the disease as patients lived it, the treatments of the era, the physician who challenged the consensus, and the slow, bitter fight to change medical minds. No host chatting between clips, no panel debating trivia. Just one complete story, narrated start to finish, built from case notes, journals, and the archives of historical medicine.

You will walk hospital wards where historical medicine did more harm than the illness, follow surgeons racing the clock before anesthesia existed, and meet the stubborn few whose heresies became the foundations of modern care. Some episodes follow a single outbreak from first fever to final count; others trace a treatment's journey from miracle to malpractice. All of them treat historical medicine as what it really is: the story of humanity learning, painfully, how bodies actually work.

If you are drawn to historical medicine told like a slow-burning thriller, this is built for you. New episodes drop regularly, each one a self-contained case from the archives of historical medicine. Subscribe now so the next one lands the moment it goes live.Copyright OBOMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT Mondiale
Episodi
  • The Policy Sheet She Read Out Loud Stopped an Illegal Draw

    The Policy Sheet She Read Out Loud Stopped an Illegal Draw
    Nov 4 2026
    A nurse reads a signed policy aloud in a burn unit and refuses a detective’s blood draw from an unconscious patient-how did that expose them?

    The Policy Sheet She Read Out Loud Stopped an Illegal Draw

    In this episode, we follow the moments inside the University of Utah Hospital on July 26, 2017, when charge nurse Alex Wubbels used a written policy to deny a blood draw from an unconscious patient. The episode traces the arrest, the hospital-police agreement at the center of the clash, and the questions that ripple from that single confrontation.

    Person: Alex Wubbels
    Date: July 26, 2017
    Location: University of Utah Hospital burn unit, Salt Lake City
    Patient: William Gray
    Officer: Detective Jeff Payne

    - Wubbels held the hospital-SLCPD policy in her palm and read three conditions aloud that must be met for a blood draw from an unconscious patient.
    - The policy required one of three: arrest, warrant, or patient consent - none of which applied to William Gray.
    - Payne, who had trained under the hospital-police liaison program and knew the policy, ordered the arrest and spoke with Lieutenant James Tracy on speakerphone.
    - Body camera and hospital surveillance captured Wubbels calmly stating the policy, turning to leave, and then being grabbed and handcuffed at approximately 2:30 p.m.
    - Wubbels was held for about twenty minutes and released; no charges were ever filed, and the incident remained largely quiet until a body camera file surfaced thirty-six days later.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    17 min
  • The hospital that treated her the night she died ignored the warning signs

    The hospital that treated her the night she died ignored the warning signs
    Nov 3 2026
    A pregnant woman arrived at a U.S. hospital - how did the hospital miss the warning signs?

    The hospital that treated her the night she died ignored the warning signs

    In this episode, we lay out the facts about maternal mortality in the United States and the hospital systems that treat pregnant women. We track rising national rates, disparities by race and place, and the clinical and systemic gaps that preceded one woman's fatal night; what patterns and decisions set the scene for that case?

    Person: CDC (data source)
    Date: 2011-2014 (key comparison period) and 2023 (rate cited)
    Location: United States; Washington, D.C. (local example)
    Topic: Maternal mortality, preventability, racial disparities
    Event: Woman treated at a hospital the night she died

    - The U.S. maternal mortality rate rose from 9.1 (1979-1986 average) to 18.6 per 100,000 live births by 2023, while many peer nations stayed under 3.
    - Between 2011 and 2014, 7,208 deaths occurred within one year of pregnancy ending; 2,726 were confirmed pregnancy-related and deemed largely preventable by the CDC.
    - From 2017-2019 in 36 states, mental health conditions (suicide, overdose, substance use) were the leading category of pregnancy-related deaths at 23%, followed by hemorrhage (14%) and cardiac conditions (13%).
    - Black women’s maternal mortality rates were roughly 3-4 times higher than white women's (e.g., 40.0 vs. 12.4 per 100,000 in 2011-2014; ~50 vs. 14.5 in 2023), with local spikes like D.C.’s Black rate of 79 per 100,000 concentrated in specific wards.
    - Studies and surveys documented communication problems, discrimination, and hospital-level differences that researchers linked to higher severe maternal morbidity and mortality for Black women.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    15 min
  • The sweet-tasting solvent that poisoned a hundred and five people

    The sweet-tasting solvent that poisoned a hundred and five people
    Nov 2 2026
    A sweet-smelling bottle labeled “medicine” in 1937 and one compound that slipped past tests - how did diethylene glycol expose them?

    The sweet-tasting solvent that poisoned a hundred and five people

    In this episode, we follow the story of a colorless, faintly sweet solvent that masqueraded as medicine and resurfaced across industries and decades. We trace the chain from a 1937 elixir to later scandals and ask what in the pharmaceutical supply chain lets diethylene glycol recur.

    Person: S. E. Massengill (company)
    Date: 1937
    Compound: diethylene glycol
    Event: 105 deaths after drinking an elixir
    Law: Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938

    - Chemists at S. E. Massengill chose diethylene glycol as a solvent for sulfanilamide after testing only appearance, viscosity, and taste.
    - Diethylene glycol resembles glycerin and propylene glycol in look, texture, and faint sweetness, enabling substitution in liquid medicines.
    - More than two hundred gallons of the elixir were distributed across fifteen states before deaths were linked to the product.
    - The 1938 law required proof of safety for drugs but did not change global ingredient supply chains that enable substitutions.
    - Decades later, the same compound appeared in Austrian wines (1985) and paracetamol syrup in Nigeria (1990), repeating the pattern of cheap substitution.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    17 min
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Ancora nessuna recensione