Since the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered in 1947, their material evidence and compelling content have fascinated both scholars and the general public. Regarded as one of the most significant archaeological finds of the 20th century, the unearthed materials have shed light on and rejuvenated extensive areas of biblical scholarship. However, research into the material findings concerning religious sacrifice has been somewhat overlooked. In this analysis, Jamal-Dominique Hopkins delves into the life and archaeology of Qumran, as well as the valued perspectives on sacrifice found in the non-biblical sectarian Dead Sea Scrolls. Hopkins investigates the historical and ideological evolution of the Jewish priestly movement associated with the scrolls, primarily from the viewpoint of its later offshoot, the Qumran community. This comprehensive study of sacrifice within the Dead Sea Scrolls provides a historical reconstruction of this key community and its captivating narrative. Hopkins uncovers the evolution of a community from its pre-Qumranic to Qumranic phases, which opted to spiritualize the Jerusalem temple and its sacrificial rites. As a result of their displacement to the Qumran desert, due to the absence of the physical temple in Jerusalem, this wandering priestly group perceived itself as a 'temple.' Instead of performing actual animal sacrifices, they offered the fruits of their lips through prayer and praise as an alternative form of sacrifice. By separating from the larger community, this Qumran group transformed into an eschatological community engaged in the practice of cultic spiritualization.

In this monograph, Matthew Goldstone investigates the perceptions of religious texts in early Jewish and Christian communities regarding the responsibility to rebuke others, based on the biblical verse: "Rebuke your fellow but do not incur sin" (Leviticus 19:17).

Through a thorough analysis of texts from the Bible, the Talmud, late Midrashim, and early Christian monastic writings, he highlights a progression from questioning how to rebuke during the Second Temple and early Christian periods, to exploring whether rebuke is permissible in early rabbinic texts, and ultimately to discussing whether rebuke should be practiced in later rabbinic and monastic sources.

By mapping these insights onto changing sociological contexts, this work presents a novel perspective on the nature of interpersonal responsibility in antiquity.

Jason Silverman offers a timely and essential examination that enhances our comprehension of Achaemenid ideology and Persian Period Judaism.

Although the Achaemenid Persian Empire (c. 550–330 BCE) surpassed all prior empires of the Ancient Near East in both scale and duration, the royal system that created and sustained this civilization is still only partially understood, as is the imperial and religious heritage left for future generations. To address this gap, Silverman presents a critically advanced and interdisciplinary framework for comparative studies.

As the Achaemenids reconstructed the Jerusalem temple, the Judaean literature from this era reveals conflicts regarding its Persian restoration, showcasing clashing religious viewpoints. While both First Zechariah (1–8) and Second Isaiah (40–55) are subjects of debate, the broader imperial context is seldom examined in detail; both texts directly address the temple's legitimacy, linking them closely to the kings' interactions with cults. Silverman investigates how the Achaemenid kings depicted their authority to subjugated minorities, the methods by which minority elites adapted this ideology, and the duration of this influence, as evidenced by the Judaean responses to the temple's restoration in Jerusalem.