Send us a text

"When More Isn't Better: The Hidden Dangers of Chasing Yield"

Episode Overview

Does higher yield always mean better returns? In this episode, we tackle one of the most seductive—and dangerous—assumptions in income investing: that if a little yield is good, more must be better. The research tells a different story. We explore why chasing yield can become your financial undoing and provide practical frameworks to help you identify when a distribution is sustainable versus when it's a red flag signaling trouble ahead.

For DIY investors building resilient retirement portfolios, understanding the difference between attractive yield and risky yield is essential. This episode gives you the analytical tools to evaluate income investments beyond the headline number, focusing on what really matters: sustainable, reliable cash flow that won't disappear when you need it most.

Key Topics Covered

The Risk Landscape Beyond Principal Loss (02:04)

Understanding Yield Risk and Income Risk (04:15)

Critical Yield Thresholds by Asset Class (09:22)

REITs: The 5.5% Warning Line (11:55)

Closed-End Funds: Leverage, NAV, and the 8% Ceiling (14:55)

Covered Call ETFs: The 10% Reality Check (18:37)

Master Limited Partnerships: Energy Infrastructure Complexity (21:46)

Coverage Ratios: The Universal Metric (25:25)

Terminal Funds: A Special Consideration (27:01)

Critical Takeaways for DIY Investors

The allure of high yield can override careful analysis, but sustainable retirement income demands discipline. Higher yields generally indicate higher risk, and understanding where yield crosses from attractive to dangerous is essential for building a portfolio that won't fail you in retirement.

Each asset class has different risk characteristics and different sustainable yield ranges. A REIT paying 7% isn't the same as a covered call ETF paying 7%—the underlying mechanics are entirely different, and the sustainability implications vary dramatically. Context and asset class understanding matter more than the headline number.

Return of capital isn't automatically disqualifying, but it demands investigation. For MLPs, some ROC is normal and expected. For REITs and CEFs, consistent high ROC percentages signal distributions exceeding what the investment actually earns, which is unsustainable. Your brokerage platform provides distribution breakdown information—use it to understand what you're actually receiving.

Coverage ratios reveal the truth about distribution sustainability. If an investment consistently pays out more than it earns, the math inevitably catches up through distribution cuts or principal erosion. Temporary shortfalls in a single payment period might be manageable, but year-over-year patterns of distributions exceeding results should raise serious concerns.

The income investor's primary risk isn't share price volatility—it's distribution cuts. While declining share values create reinvestment challenges, as long as your income stream remains intact and covers your expenses, short-term price movements matter less. However, a distribution cut hits you twice: reduced income and typically declining share prices, creating compounding problems that can undermine your entire retirement strategy.

Send us a text

Why the 4% Rule Failed (And What Actually Works)

Episode Description:

The 4% withdrawal rule has become retirement planning gospel—but here's the problem: almost nobody actually follows it. In this episode, we unpack why retirees consistently withdraw only 2% of their portfolios annually, despite decades of research validating higher withdrawal rates. More importantly, we reveal what the data shows does work: building portfolios with reliable income streams that give you permission to actually enjoy your retirement wealth.

This episode delivers actionable strategies backed by real research.

Key Topics Covered

The 4% Rule: Origins and Evolution

• William Bengen's 1994 research establishing the "safe max" withdrawal rate
• How the rule actually works (initial withdrawal + annual inflation adjustments)
• The critical distinction: 4% was the minimum worst-case scenario, not a ceiling
• Subsequent research validation (Trinity Study, Wade Pfau's international analysis)
• Morningstar's annual updates (ranging from 3.3% to 4% over the past five years)
• Bengen's own upward revisions over time

The Decumulation Paradox

• Why retirees average only 2% withdrawal rates when 4%+ is considered safe
• The psychology of loss aversion in retirement spending
• Real-world behavior vs. theoretical models
• The emotional weight of "spending down" versus "living on income"

What the Data Actually Shows

• Research revealing retirees with guaranteed income sources withdraw and spend significantly more
• The psychological difference between "withdrawing principal" and "spending income"
• How income-producing assets change spending behavior and retirement satisfaction
• Social Security as a foundational guaranteed income layer

Building a Resilient Income Portfolio

Multiple asset classes for generating reliable retirement income:

• Annuities - Guaranteed income contracts
• Closed-End Funds (CEFs) - Consistent distribution vehicles
• Covered Call ETFs - Systematic income generation from broad market indices
• Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) - Higher complexity, substantial income potential
• Bonds - Municipal bonds for taxable accounts, corporate bonds for tax-deferred
• Strategic allocation: balancing income-producing assets with growth investments

Key Timestamps

00:00:57 - Introduction: The 4% rule's surprising failure
00:01:31 - Why Americans ignore proven withdrawal rate research
00:02:11 - William Bengen's original 1994 research explained
00:03:09 - How the 4% rule actually works (with inflation adjustments)
00:05:53 - Scientific validation and replication studies
00:06:59 - International market considerations (Wade Pfau's research)
00:08:07 - Morningstar's annual safe withdrawal rate updates
00:12:37 - The decumulation paradox: Why retirees withdraw only 2%
00:14:32 - Research on actual retirement spending behaviors
00:18:53 - The guaranteed income advantage: spending 3x more
00:23:51 - Actionable strategies: Building your income portfolio
00:26:50 - What to do if your income exceeds your needs
00:29:00 - Tax considerations across different account types

The research is clear: Building resilient retirement portfolios isn't just about maximizing returns—it's about creating sustainable income streams that give you both financial security and psychological permission to enjoy what you've built.

Send us a text

Episode Description:

Before you hire someone to help with your retirement portfolio, you need to know what you're actually hiring. This episode breaks down the four main categories of financial professionals—investment advisors, financial planners, brokers, and insurance agents—and explains what each one actually does, how they get paid, and which standard of care they follow.

If you're a DIY investor considering professional guidance, or if you need specific products that require working with a licensed professional, this primer will help you understand who does what and avoid costly confusion.

Episode Highlights

[00:00 - 02:21] Welcome Back to Season 2

• Introduction to the topic: hiring professionals for retirement planning
• Why this matters even for DIY-minded investors
• Some retirement income strategies require working with licensed professionals

[02:21 - 05:14] What Is a Financial Advisor, Really?

• The confusion around the term "financial advisor"
• Four categories of financial professionals: investment advisors, financial planners, brokers, and insurance agents
• Warning signs: titles like "financial professional," "financial representative," or "financial consultant" often aren't true financial advisors

[05:14 - 08:25] Investment Advisors: The True Financial Advisors

• Legal definition and licensing requirements
• How they're compensated (typically 1-1.25% annual fee charged quarterly)
• Discretionary portfolio management authority
• The Fiduciary Standard: Must act in your best interest
• The Suitability Standard: Only needs to be "suitable," not optimal (used by non-fiduciary professionals)

[08:25 - 11:16] Financial Planners: Big Picture Guidance

• Focus on broader financial advice, not just investments
• Services include budgeting, debt management, major financial decisions
• Comprehensive planning using specialized software
• May or may not hold investment licenses
• Often compensated through flat fees, hourly rates, or retainer arrangements

[11:16 - 17:45] Brokers/Registered Representatives

• Transaction-based compensation model
• Follow suitability standard, not fiduciary standard
• Load mutual funds and commissioned products
• Increasingly being replaced by self-directed platforms
• Often work with employer 401(k) plans and prospect through workplace seminars

[17:45 - 21:50] Insurance Agents: The Product Specialists

• Specialize in life insurance (term and permanent) and annuities
• Commission-based compensation
• Follow suitability standard
• Products you can't easily buy on your own—you need a licensed agent
• Generally lack deep investment or broader financial planning expertise

[21:50 - 29:32] How to Choose the Right Professional

• Why one person rarely does everything well
• Financial advisors excel at portfolio management but may lack insurance expertise
• Financial planners excel at comprehensive planning but may not actively manage investments
• Insurance agents are product specialists but typically don't handle investments
• Look for teams of professionals or strong referral networks
• Understanding these distinctions prevents mismatched expectations

Host: Brandon Roberts, with nearly 20 years of experience in retirement and financial planning

Subscribe: Available on all major podcast platforms YouTube: Yield to Reason YouTube channel Website: yieldtoreason.com

"Real wealth doesn't just add up. It writes checks."