Why AI Needs Legislation, Ep. 59
Impossibile aggiungere al carrello
Rimozione dalla Lista desideri non riuscita.
Non è stato possibile aggiungere il titolo alla Libreria
Non è stato possibile seguire il Podcast
Esecuzione del comando Non seguire più non riuscita
-
Letto da:
-
Di:
A federal appeals court just affirmed that a Wisconsin man’s private possession of thousands of AI generated sexual images of children is protected by the First Amendment. The judge who wrote it said he had concerns about where those lines fall and asked the Supreme Court to revisit them.
Joshua Broome walks through the ruling, answers the argument that this material is harmless because no real child is involved, and explains why 46 states have acted while four have not. Find out where your state stands and why voting is less about a candidate’s testimony than about the policy that restrains evil.
Subscribe now so you don’t miss future episodes, and join us as we take a stand for sexual integrity and spiritual wholeness—one step at a time.
Follow us on social media!
Instagram — https://www.instagram.com/walkworthy_ministry?igsh=cHdkeGVoM2tldXV3
YouTube — https://youtube.com/@walkworthy-ministry?si=zG-fa7ENsfvXc_k3
TikTok — https://www.tiktok.com/@walkworthyministry?_t=ZP-8ymyTw7xVKp&_r=1