Venezuela, Ukraine, and the Fragile Logic of Peace
Impossibile aggiungere al carrello
Rimozione dalla Lista desideri non riuscita.
Non è stato possibile aggiungere il titolo alla Libreria
Non è stato possibile seguire il Podcast
Esecuzione del comando Non seguire più non riuscita
-
Letto da:
-
Di:
A proposito di questo titolo
In this episode, we examine how recent U.S. actions in Venezuela may reshape the global context in which peace talks over Ukraine are taking place. Moving beyond headlines and geography, the analysis explains how precedent, power, and narrative influence diplomacy. We explore why Ukraine faces a strategic dilemma, how Russia can exploit perceived double standards, and how the normalization of force by great powers complicates negotiations. The episode argues that even distant conflicts can alter the logic of peace, not by changing borders, but by changing the rules under which power is exercised.
Bibliography
Kramer, Andrew E. “Ukrainians Welcome a U.S. Victory in Venezuela, and Lament a Double Standard.” New York Times, January 4, 2026.
Méheut, Constant. “How Russia and Ukraine Are Fighting to Shape Trump’s View of the War.” New York Times, December 30, 2025.
Monroe, James. Seventh Annual Message to Congress. December 2, 1823. National Archives, Washington, D.C.
Nehamas, Nicholas, Edward Wong, and Tyler Pager. “Russia Asks United States to Stop Pursuit of Fleeing Oil Tanker.” New York Times, January 1, 2026.
Nierenberg, Amelia. “Denmark Tells Trump to ‘Stop the Threats’ About Greenland.” New York Times, January 5, 2026.
Sanger, David E. “The Donroe Doctrine.” New York Times, The Morning,January 2026.
United States. National Security Council. National Security Strategy of the United States. Washington, D.C., November 2025.