The Sales Japan Series copertina

The Sales Japan Series

The Sales Japan Series

Di: Dale Carnegie Japan
Ascolta gratuitamente

3 mesi a soli 0,99 €/mese

Dopo 3 mesi, 9,99 €/mese. Si applicano termini e condizioni.

A proposito di questo titolo

 The vast majority of salespeople are just pitching the features of their solutions and doing it the hard way. They are throwing mud up against the wall and hoping it will stick. Hope by the way is not much of a strategy. They do it this way because they are untrained. Even if their company won't invest in training for them, this podcast provides hundreds of episodes with information, insights and techniques all based on solid real world experience selling in Japan. Trying to work it out by yourself is possible but why take the slow and difficult route to sales success? Tap into the structure, methodologies, tips and techniques needed to be successful in sales in Japan. In addition to the podcast the best selling book Japan Sales Mastery and its Japanese translation Za Eigyo are also available as well.Copyright 2022 Economia Gestione e leadership Management
Episodi
  • The Buyer's Gap

    The Buyer's Gap
    Jan 20 2026
    Clients don't need to do anything — and that's the brutal truth every salesperson meets early. If a buyer can stick with the same supplier, or do nothing at all, many will. The only thing that moves them is a felt gap between where they are now and where they want to be, plus a reason to bridge it now, not "sometime later". This piece unpacks how to surface that gap without bruising ego, how to test the buyer's DIY confidence with diplomacy, and how to quantify the pain of inaction so urgency becomes logical and emotional — the kind that actually triggers action. Why don't buyers take action even when they agree there's a problem? Buyers can agree there's a gap and still do nothing, because "no change" is often the lowest-risk option. In B2B and complex services, inaction is a decision: keep the incumbent, keep the budget, keep the politics calm. Post-pandemic (2021–2025), many firms tightened discretionary spend, so "we'll revisit next quarter" became a default script — whether you're selling into a Tokyo conglomerate, a US mid-market SaaS firm, or a European manufacturer. Procurement teams are trained to delay; senior leaders are trained to back their own judgement; and everyone is juggling competing priorities. Your job isn't to force urgency — it's to reframe the cost of waiting so the buyer persuades themselves. That's classic Challenger thinking and it pairs neatly with Dale Carnegie-style respect: tough on the issue, gentle with the person. Mini-summary: Agreement isn't action; urgency comes from reframing risk. Do now: Ask, "What happens if nothing changes by the end of this quarter?" What exactly is the "buyer's gap" in sales — and how do you diagnose it fast? The buyer's gap is the distance between the buyer's current reality and their desired future, measured in outcomes, not opinions. Think of it as a before/after delta: revenue leakage, churn, quality defects, compliance exposure, missed hires, stalled strategy. In Salesforce or HubSpot terms, it's the difference between "pipeline health today" and "forecast reliability we need by FY2026". In SPIN Selling language, it's the implication of the problem, expressed in business impact. Diagnosing it quickly means anchoring in concrete targets (KPIs, SLAs, customer NPS, cycle time, cost-to-serve) and a timeframe (this quarter, next six months, before a product launch). Compare contexts: Japanese decision-making often needs broader internal alignment; US teams may move faster but demand ROI proof; both still require clarity on what "better" looks like and what "staying put" costs. Mini-summary: A gap you can't measure becomes a gap you can't sell. Do now: Get the buyer to state one KPI and one deadline they'll be judged on. How do you test a buyer's DIY confidence without insulting them? You don't tell leaders they're wrong — you ask questions that let them discover the limits of "we can do it ourselves". Most executives have strong self-belief. If you attack it, you'll trigger defensiveness and stall the deal. Instead, use diplomatic, diagnostic questions that probe resourcing, capability, and trade-offs: "Who owns this internally?", "What will they stop doing to make time?", "What's the plan if your top performer leaves?", "How will you measure progress in 30 days?" That's subtle pressure, not arrogance. It's also psychologically smart: people trust conclusions they reach themselves (behavioural science 101, think Kahneman). In Japan, where saving face matters, this matters even more; in startups, the risk is overconfidence and bandwidth collapse. Your goal is respectful doubt — enough to show that DIY has hidden costs and timelines. Mini-summary: Self-persuasion beats salesperson persuasion. Do now: Ask, "What would have to be true for DIY to work on time — and what usually gets in the way?" How do you create urgency without sounding manipulative or desperate? Urgency isn't hype — it's a credible timeline tied to consequences the buyer already cares about. Manipulative urgency ("discount ends Friday") works in low-stakes retail; it backfires in enterprise sales. What works is a shared clock: contract renewals, regulatory deadlines, board reviews, hiring cycles, seasonal demand, or tech deprecation. As of 2025, AI and cyber risk conversations have made timelines sharper — but buyers still resist if the consequence is fuzzy. So you build urgency with cause and effect: "If implementation slips past March, your Q2 launch misses the marketing window", or "If churn stays at 12% for another two quarters, CAC payback blows out". Use comparative framing: multinationals have bureaucracy delays; SMEs have cashflow risk; both suffer when waiting compounds losses. Mini-summary: Real urgency is timeline + consequence, not theatre. Do now: Co-create a milestone plan and ask, "What breaks if we miss this date?" How do you quantify the cost of inaction when you don't have all the numbers? You don't need perfect data — ...
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    11 min
  • The Client Needs Analysis Process

    The Client Needs Analysis Process
    Jan 13 2026
    In the last episode we looked at uncovering any buyer misperceptions about our organisation and then dealing with them. How did that go? Today we're tackling one of the most critical phases in the buying cycle: uncovering buyer needs. Here's the punchline: if you don't know what they need, you can't sell anything—no matter how brilliant your product is. And buyer needs aren't uniform. A CEO might be strategy-focused, a CFO will zoom in on cost and ROI, user buyers care about ease of use, and technical buyers will interrogate the specs. That's the directional truth—then your questioning skills do the real work. How do you uncover buyer needs without guessing or pitching too early? You uncover buyer needs by analysing what you're looking for before you start asking questions or showing slides. Most salespeople do the opposite: they rock up, pitch hard, and hope something sticks. That's basically dumb. In Japan, especially, buyers often default to "safer" decisions—keep the incumbent, do nothing, delay, or create consensus through internal alignment (think nemawashi and ringi-style approvals). In the US or Australia, you might get faster objections; in Japan you'll often get silence, hesitation, or "we'll consider it." Same meaning: risk management. So don't wing it. Prepare a needs map first, then design questions that locate the priority need and the real decision logic across stakeholders. Answer card / Do now: Map needs first, question second. Don't pitch until you know what "success" looks like for thisbuyer. What is a buyer's "Primary Interest" and why does it matter more than product features? Primary Interest is the outcome the buyer cares about—not the tool, not the features, not your brochure. Buyers buy results: more revenue, improved efficiency, better safety, higher quality, greater flexibility, stronger ROI. If you spend the whole meeting talking about the "tool," you've missed the point. This is where B2B sellers get trapped—especially in tech, consulting, HR services, and industrial solutions. Features are easy to copy; outcomes are what justify budget. In a multinational procurement team, Primary Interest might be "standardisation across APAC," while an SME founder might want "cashflow certainty in the next 90 days." Same category, totally different language. Your job is to find the onehigh-priority outcome that makes the decision obvious, and keep coming back to it. Answer card / Do now: Translate your offering into a single measurable outcome the buyer cares about (time saved, risk reduced, revenue gained). What "Buying Criteria" do executives and procurement teams actually use? Buying Criteria are the must-haves that determine whether your solution is even allowed into the final decision. These are the basics: budget fit, required features, approvals, implementation effort, after-sales support, location constraints, quantity, quality, security, integration requirements, and vendor reliability. In enterprise deals, this often becomes a checklist: legal, IT, finance, procurement, and the business unit all have veto points. In Japan, buying criteria can heavily favour "proven suppliers" and "low disruption." In the US, you may see more appetite for a challenger vendor—if the business case is strong. In regulated sectors (finance, healthcare, infrastructure), criteria can be as much about governance and auditability as it is about performance. Quick checklist you can use in discovery: Budget range and approval pathNon-negotiable features / specsSupport expectations (SLA, training, local coverage)Timeline and resourcing constraints Answer card / Do now: Get the buyer's must-have criteria early—before you invest weeks chasing a deal you can't qualify into. How do you handle "Risk vs Reward" when buyers prefer doing nothing? Risk vs Reward is where deals stall—because "no decision" feels safer than change. In Japan, the safest move is often sticking with the current supplier or system. That inertia is brutal for salespeople. But here's the twist: doing nothing isn't free—it carries an opportunity cost. The buyer may lose market position, miss a turning point, or let a competitor strengthen their foothold. Post-pandemic, many firms tightened governance and became more cautious, even while digital transformation accelerated (a messy paradox in the 2020s). To shift this, you must quantify the return versus investment. If you can't provide credible numbers—time saved, defects reduced, revenue impact, risk mitigation—you're asking them to "trust you," which is not a strategy. Use conservative ranges if you must, but bring maths. Answer card / Do now: Reframe "no action" as a cost. Quantify the loss of delay in plain numbers the CFO can defend. Why should salespeople always ask "why" after an objection or hesitation? Because the first objection is often a symptom—not the real reason. I was talking to a President recently and he pushed for added value ...
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    12 min
  • Dealing With Misperceptions in Sales

    Dealing With Misperceptions in Sales
    Dec 30 2025
    Business is brutal and sometimes clients receive incorrect information about your company from competitors, rumours, or the media—and it can kill deals before you even get into features. Why do misperceptions about a company derail sales so fast? Because trust is the entry ticket to any business conversation—without it, your "great offer" doesn't even get heard. If a buyer suspects your firm is unstable, unethical, or incompetent, they'll filter everything you say as "sales spin" and you'll feel resistance no matter how good the solution is. This is especially sharp in relationship-heavy markets like Japan, where reputation risk is taken seriously, but it happens everywhere—Australia, the US, Europe—because buyers fear being blamed for a bad vendor choice. The worst part is misperceptions are often hidden: in strong relationships a client might tell you what they've heard, but in new relationships they may never mention it while silently disengaging. Do now: Treat "reputation risk" as a normal obstacle, not a rare exception—assume misperceptions may exist and plan to surface them early. What's a real example of reputation damage caused by misinformation? A single error can wipe out trust at scale, and recovery can take years. A famous case involved a Japanese TV news report in 1985 that linked a wine adulteration scandal to "Australia," when the scandal actually involved "Austria"—a mix-up made easier because the country names sound similar in Japanese. The result was devastating: Australian wine sales in Japan collapsed and took a long time to recover. That story is a reminder that "fake news" doesn't need to be malicious to be damaging; sometimes it's a linguistic slip, a competitor's whisper campaign, or a lazy assumption repeated as "fact." In modern terms (as of 2025), misinformation spreads faster via social media and industry chat groups, so the impact can be immediate. Do now: Collect 2–3 "reassurance proof points" (stability, client results, certifications) you can deploy if a rumour appears. How do you uncover negative perceptions the buyer isn't saying out loud? Ask directly, gently—and then shut up. The simplest line is: "So what are your perceptions about our organisation?" Then don't add a single extra word. Silence is the tool. If you soften it with excuses or explanations, you reduce the chance they'll tell you the truth. This matters because you can't fix what you can't see. Many salespeople are far too optimistic and assume the buyer starts neutral-to-positive. In reality, the buyer may have heard something ugly from a rival, read something outdated online, or had a bad past experience with someone "like you." Your job is to draw it out early, before you waste time presenting to a sceptic. Do now: Add the "perceptions question" to your first-meeting checklist and practise staying silent for 5–10 seconds after asking it. What should you say when the buyer shares a negative belief (without getting defensive)? Don't argue—use a neutral "cushion" to buy thinking time. When a buyer says something negative, your instinct is to correct them fast. That's dangerous: defensive reactions make your mouth outrun your brain and you can say the wrong thing. A cushion is a neutral statement that neither agrees nor disagrees, and it lets you stay calm and professional. Think: "I see," "That's helpful to know," or "Thanks for sharing that." Then you choose your pathway based on what they said. This works across cultures: in Japan it protects harmony and face; in Australia and the US it signals maturity and confidence. Do now: Write 3 cushion phrases you can say naturally, and ban yourself from instant "No, that's wrong…" reactions. What are the three best ways to respond: agree, dissociate, or correct? Pick the response that matches the type of misperception—partial truth, social proof gap, or factual error. Agree (with clarification): If it was true in the past, acknowledge it and update the reality (e.g., systems upgraded, issue eliminated).Dissociate (social proof): Show that other credible clients worked with you and got results—implying the fear didn't stop them.Correct (evidence): If it's factually wrong, provide hard proof to remove the concern. The skill is not choosing "the nicest" option—it's choosing the right option. If you try to "correct" something that's emotional or reputation-based without rapport, you can make them dig in harder. Do now: Build a mini playbook: one Agree line, one Dissociate line, and one Correct-with-evidence pattern you can reuse. After you neutralise the misperception, how do you rebuild credibility and move forward? Shift into positive territory by highlighting your most relevant USP and expanding their view of your strengths—without turning it into a pitch. Once the concern is handled, you reinforce why you're the best partner by selecting the USP that fits their situation (not your favourite USP). This ...
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    12 min
Ancora nessuna recensione