Rest didn't fix it. That's because burnout in clinical practice is often driven by something different: grief. Grief requires a different kind of repair. In this episode, we go beneath the surface of therapist burnout to explore its intersection with moral injury: the wound that forms when clinicians are repeatedly asked to act against their own values. We talk about why rest alone doesn't heal this kind of harm, how ethical compromise accumulates in the nervous system, and what genuine recovery actually looks like, built on autonomy, values alignment, and honest reckoning with the systems shaping your practice.

If you've ever felt like you're mourning the work you trained to do, this conversation is where I'd start. In this episode:

• Why burnout and grief so often look the same — and why the distinction matters
• The difference between exhaustion, burnout, secondary traumatic stress, and moral injury
• How ethical compromise shows up in the body and the work
• Why "rest more" is not a treatment plan for moral injury
• What recovery actually requires

The Research Behind This Episode:

The WHO (2019) classifies burnout as an occupational phenomenon — not a personal one — defined by exhaustion, cynicism, and reduced professional efficacy. That framing matters. It locates the problem in conditions, not character. → https://www.who.int/news/item/28-05-2019-burn-out-an-occupational-phenomenon-international-classification-of-disease

Maslach & Leiter (2016) showed that burnout emerges at the intersection of individual experience and workplace environment. Emotional exhaustion is only one dimension — depersonalization and loss of professional efficacy are equally significant, and harder to recover from without structural change. → https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4911781/

Golkar et al. (2019) documented the physiological signature of burnout: dysregulated stress response systems, altered HPA axis functioning, and measurable changes in how the nervous system processes threat. This is not metaphor. Burnout changes the body. → https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6701350/

Čartolovni et al. (2021) clarified that moral injury is distinct from burnout — it arises specifically from perpetrating, witnessing, or failing to prevent acts that violate one's moral code, or from institutional betrayal. For clinicians, this often means the system, not the client, is the source of the wound. → https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8366182/

Williamson, Murphy & Greenberg (2020) connected moral injury directly to frontline clinical work, establishing that the conditions of care delivery — not just the content — generate injury. → https://academic.oup.com/occmed/article/70/5/317/5842928

Purcell et al. (2024) found that moral injury in healthcare workers is significantly linked to organizational culture and modifiable workplace conditions — reinforcing that recovery isn't only an inside job. The conditions have to change too. → https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11951272/