The McLendon Burden: Alabama's Tough Standard for Changing Child Custody
Impossibile aggiungere al carrello
Rimozione dalla Lista desideri non riuscita.
Non è stato possibile aggiungere il titolo alla Libreria
Non è stato possibile seguire il Podcast
Esecuzione del comando Non seguire più non riuscita
The McLendon Burden: Alabama's Tough Standard for Changing Child Custody
-
Letto da:
-
Di:
A proposito di questo titolo
Send us a text
Since 1984, Alabama family courts have applied the landmark Ex parte McLendon ruling—a stringent legal test that makes modifying child custody one of the hardest battles in divorce law. Known as the McLendon standard, it requires the parent seeking change to prove not just a material change in circumstances, but that switching custody will materially promote the child's welfare and that the benefits outweigh the inherent disruption of uprooting a child's life.
In this episode, we break down the origins of the McLendon rule, how it creates a strong presumption in favor of the custodial parent, and why it's designed to prioritize stability over frequent changes. We'll explore real-world implications: the heavy burden on non-custodial parents, comparisons to the less strict "best interests" standard in initial custody cases, and ongoing debates about whether this decades-old doctrine still serves modern families. Is McLendon a shield for children—or a barrier to justice? Join us for an in-depth look at one of Alabama's most influential family law standards.
Support the show