The Foundational Lie of 'Hire-to-Retire' - Deconstructing the Architectural Debt of Modern HR Systems copertina

The Foundational Lie of 'Hire-to-Retire' - Deconstructing the Architectural Debt of Modern HR Systems

The Foundational Lie of 'Hire-to-Retire' - Deconstructing the Architectural Debt of Modern HR Systems

Ascolta gratuitamente

Vedi i dettagli del titolo

A proposito di questo titolo

 (00:00:00) The Hidden Truth About Hire to Retire (00:00:33) The Myth of a Linear Life Cycle (00:00:55) The Distributed Decision Engine (00:05:12) The Configuration Entropy Trap (00:07:17) AI's Limitations in HR Systems (00:14:39) Workday's Process Rigor Fallacy (00:19:42) Success Factors' Global Complexity Dilemma (00:25:19) Entra ID: The Shadow System of Record (00:31:03) Power Automate: The Debugging Economy (00:31:29) The Pitfalls of Using Flows as Policy Engines The Foundational Lie of “Hire-to-Retire”Deconstructing the Architectural Debt of Modern HR Systems 🧠 Episode Summary Most organizations believe hire-to-retire is a lifecycle. It isn’t. It’s a story layered on top of fragmented systems making independent decisions at different speeds, with different definitions of truth. In this episode, we dismantle the hire-to-retire myth and expose what’s actually running your HR stack: a distributed decision engine built from workflows, configuration, identity controls, and integration glue. We show why HR teams end up debugging flows instead of designing policy, why AI pilots plateau at “recommendation only,” and why architectural debt accelerates—not shrinks—under automation. This is not an implementation critique. It’s an architectural one. You’ll leave with:A new mental model for HR systems that survives scale, regulation, and AIA diagnostic checklist to surface hidden policy and configuration entropyA reference architecture that separates intent, facts, execution, and explanationIf AI is exposing cracks in your HR platform instead of creating leverage, this episode explains why—and what to do next. pasted 🔍 What We Cover 1. The Foundational MisunderstandingWhy hire-to-retire is not a processHR systems as distributed decision engines, not linear workflowsThe danger of forcing dynamic obligations into static, form-driven stages2. Configuration Entropy: When “Setup” Becomes PolicyHow templates, stages, connectors, and email phrasing silently become lawWhy standardization alone accelerates hidden divergenceThe three places policy hides:Presentation (emails, labels, templates)Flow structure (stages, approvals, branches)Integration logic (filters, retries, mappings)3. Why AI Pilots Fail in HRThe intent extraction problemWhy models infer chaos when policy is implicitWhy copilots plateau at summaries instead of decisionsWhy explainability collapses when intent isn’t first-class4. Platform Archetypes (Failure by Design, Not by Mistake)Transactional cores with adaptive debtProcess rigor mistaken for intelligenceGlobal compliance creating local entropyIdentity platforms becoming shadow systems of recordIntegration glue evolving into the operating model5. The Mental Model Shift That Actually Works From lifecycle stages → to:Capability provisioningObligation trackingIdentity orchestrationWhy systems can enforce contracts, not stories. 6. The HR Entropy Diagnostic (Run This Tomorrow)Where does policy actually live today?Can you explain why a decision happened—with citations?Where do HR, identity, and compliance disagree—and who wins?What’s the half-life of exceptions in your environment?7. Reference Architecture That Survives AI Four layers, one job each:Policy layer – versioned, testable intentEvent layer – immutable facts, not stagesExecution layer – subscribers, not rule authorsAI reasoning layer – explanation first, always cited8. A 90-Day Architectural Debt Paydown PlanPull policy out of workflowsMake facts explicit and immutableCompile identity instead of hand-building itRequire citations, TTLs, and loud failures by default🎯 Key Takeaway Lifecycles are narratives.Systems require contracts. Until policy is explicit, versioned, and machine-queryable, AI will amplify drift—not fix it. 📣 Call to Action If your HR team spends more time debugging integrations than designing policy, this episode is for you. Subscribe for the next deep dive on authorization compilers and policy-driven identity, and share this episode with the person still “fixing” flows instead of moving intent out of them.Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/m365-fm-modern-work-security-and-productivity-with-microsoft-365--6704921/support.If this clashes with how you’ve seen it play out, I’m always curious. I use LinkedIn for the back-and-forth.
Ancora nessuna recensione