Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

With the unexpected passing of my son on October 11, 2026, this week, we're going to do something a little different on The End of Innocence.

There will be no discussion of Lee Harvey Oswald, Jack Ruby, the Warren Commission, or the events in Dallas on November 22, 1963.

Instead, this week's episode is dedicated to the life and memory of my son, Chase.

I want to share a little about the man he was, the life he lived, the people he loved, and the legacy he leaves behind.

And to all of you who have reached out to our family with your prayers, messages, phone calls, and expressions of love and support, I want you to know how deeply grateful we are. Your kindness has meant more to us than words could ever express.

Chase Parker Young, 35, completed his End of Watch and returned home to be with our Lord and Savior on October 11, 2026. Chase was born in Fort Smith, Arkansas, to parents Johnny and Jodie Young.

Chase graduated from Southside High School, where he played in the band and wrestled on the varsity team. After high school, he joined the Army National Guard. Chase proudly served his country, including several deployments overseas and service as an Army National Guard Military Police soldier. He was a decorated veteran whose honors included the Afghanistan Campaign Medal with Campaign Star, the National Defense Service Medal, and the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal.

After two terms in the Army National Guard, Chase answered the call to serve again and began his law enforcement career with the Crawford County Sheriff's Office in May 2013. He started as a Correctional Officer at the Crawford County Detention Center, where he attained the rank of detention Sergent. Chase went on to become an integral part of the county. Chase served as a Patrol Deputy in 2016 and was later promoted to Corporal in 2019. He became a Certified Field Training Officer and was promoted to Patrol Sergeant in the same year. He later moved to the Criminal Investigations Division in 2021, where he quickly attained the rank of Sergeant. Following a brief departure as Police Chief for the Kibler Police Department in 2021, Chase returned to the Crawford County Sherrif’s Office and was promoted to the Drug Task Force as a Narcotics Officer in 2022 and had additional duties as a Task Force Officer with the Drug Enforcement Agency in the same year. Chase was later promoted to Lieutenant in the Criminal Investigations Division in 2025 and was a member of the Crawford County SWAT Team and worked with the Internet Crimes Against Children Division. In December 2025, he began a new career with the United States Forest Service. Chase was loved by his peers and fellow deputies at the Sheriff's Office, and by his classmates at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC).

A French OAS militant was reportedly in Fort Worth on the morning of November 22, 1963...

in Dallas that afternoon...

and supposedly expelled from the United States approximately 18 hours after President Kennedy was assassinated.

His name was:

Jean René Souetre.

And if you've never heard that name before, you're probably not alone.

But once you hear this story, you're going to understand why Souetre has fascinated JFK researchers for nearly fifty years.

In our ongoing series, “If Lee Harvey Oswald Didn’t Kill JFK, Then Who Did?”, we’ve examined some of the men who have been accused over the years of taking part in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. This week, we continue to turn our attention to one of the more intriguing—and controversial—names connected to the case: Herminio Díaz García.

Díaz García was a Cuban exile, anti-Castro militant, and a man reportedly experienced with weapons and political violence. Years after the assassination, allegations emerged that placed him not simply somewhere on the fringes of the JFK story—but in Dallas on November 22, 1963, as a participant in the assassination itself.

Was Herminio Díaz capable of participating in the assassination of a political leader?

Can we prove he participated in Kennedy's assassination?

What motive would Díaz have had to kill Kennedy?

And do we actually have U.S. intelligence documentation showing that he was involved in assassination planning.

That’s what we’re going to investigate today on The End of Innocence.

In our ongoing series, “If Lee Harvey Oswald Didn’t Kill JFK, Then Who Did?”, we’ve examined some of the men who have been accused over the years of taking part in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. This week, we turn our attention to one of the more intriguing—and controversial—names connected to the case: Herminio Díaz García.

Díaz García was a Cuban exile, anti-Castro militant, and a man reportedly experienced with weapons and political violence. Years after the assassination, allegations emerged that placed him not simply somewhere on the fringes of the JFK story—but in Dallas on November 22, 1963, as a participant in the assassination itself.

But where did that allegation come from? Who claimed Díaz García was involved? What evidence supports the story, and what evidence contradicts it? And perhaps most importantly: is there any reason to believe Herminio Díaz García could have been one of the men who fired at President Kennedy in Dealey Plaza?

That’s what we’re going to investigate today on The End of Innocence.

What happened to James Files after those prison interviews...

Did prison change him?

Did he really become a Christian?

What has he been doing since leaving prison?

And perhaps the biggest question...

Has James Files continued giving interviews—or has he quietly disappeared from public view?

Let's take a look.

Whether James Files is ultimately telling the truth or weaving an elaborate story remains an open question. But before anyone dismisses his account entirely, I believe these three questions deserve credible, evidence-based answers. Until those answers are provided, I think the James Files confession remains worthy of careful examination rather than outright rejection.

What has James Files been doing since that landmark 2003 interview, and has anything emerged over the last two decades that either supports—or undermines—his extraordinary claims?

Was James Files telling the truth? Or was he weaving one of the most elaborate stories in the history of the Kennedy assassination?

In this episode of The End of Innocence, we're not going to decide whether James Files was the assassin. Instead, we're going to do what every good investigator should do—we're going to examine the evidence.

We'll compare Files' first prison interview from the early 1990s with his extensive 2003 prison interview. Did his story change over those ten years? Did he contradict himself? Or did the core of his account remain remarkably consistent?

We'll examine what stayed the same, what expanded, what—if anything—changed, and what those differences might tell us about the credibility of his extraordinary claims.

Because consistency alone doesn't prove someone is telling the truth—but inconsistency can certainly raise questions.

So join me as we take a careful, objective look at one of the most controversial confessions in JFK assassination history.

I'm John R. Young, and this is The End of Innocence.