The Dignity Index with Dan Kenney (2025)
Impossibile aggiungere al carrello
Puoi avere soltanto 50 titoli nel carrello per il checkout.
Riprova più tardi
Riprova più tardi
Rimozione dalla Lista desideri non riuscita.
Riprova più tardi
Non è stato possibile aggiungere il titolo alla Libreria
Per favore riprova
Non è stato possibile seguire il Podcast
Per favore riprova
Esecuzione del comando Non seguire più non riuscita
-
Letto da:
-
Di:
A proposito di questo titolo
Introduction
- Barbara Jean Walsh (UUMUAC board member) introduces speaker Dan Kenney, a retired teacher and founder of Rooted for Good (formerly DeKalb County Community Gardens).
- The focus of the talk is The Dignity Index, a tool created in 2022 by the University of Utah and partners through the UNITE initiative to measure dignity vs. contempt in language.
What is the Dignity Index?
- An 8-point scale:
- 1–4 → contempt, dehumanization, divisive speech.
- 5–8 → dignity, respect, constructive dialogue.
- Purpose: to ease divisions, prevent violence, and foster healthier debate.
Key Themes
- Definition of dignity: rooted in the Latin dignitas (“worthy, having value”), aligned with the Unitarian Universalist principle of inherent worth and dignity of every person.
- Donna Hicks’ work: dignity violations drive conflict, divorce, war, and revenge; dignity can heal divides.
- Contempt vs. dignity:
- Contempt fuels polarization, violence, and broken relationships.
- Dignity fosters respect, inclusion, and problem-solving.
Illustrative Stories
- Special Olympics 1995: athletes used disposable cameras backwards as telescopes to see President Clinton—lesson in misjudgment and perspective.
- Historical change: institutions for people with disabilities largely closed since 1968, showing progress is possible.
- Arthur Brooks: warns of cultural addiction to contempt, driven by media business models.
- Amanda Ripley: contempt dominates political speech, inciting division and violence.
Examples of the Index in Action
- Leon Mug (Rwanda, 1992): “wipe out this scum” → Score 1 (dehumanizing, violent).
- John McCain: bipartisan cooperation → Score 6 (respectful, collaborative).
- Hillary Clinton (2016): “basket of deplorables” → Score 3 (moral contempt).
- Desmond Tutu: recognizing humanity even in child soldiers → Score 8 (universal dignity).
Call to Action
- Building blocks for a culture of dignity:
- Admit misjudgments.
- Practice bravery.
- Name the problem: contempt.
- Embrace the solution: dignity.
- Measure, manage, mobilize.
- Encouragement to take the Dignity Pledge and use the Index in personal relationships, not just politics.
- Emphasis: democracy requires healthy debate, and healthy debate requires dignity.
Closing
- Barbara Jean Walsh invites listeners to learn more at Dignity.us and UUMUAC.org, encouraging membership and engagement.
✅ In essence: The podcast argues that contempt is tearing society apart, while dignity—respecting the inherent worth of every person—is the antidote. The Dignity Index provides a practical tool to measure and encourage dignified speech, helping bridge divides in families, communities, and democracy itself.
Would you like me to condense this even further into a one-paragraph executive summary you could use for newsletters or outreach?
Ancora nessuna recensione