Joe has spent years learning the history behind the homes most people just walk past. In this episode he and Clayton explore authenticity in architecture, the real reason mid-century through 80s construction felt so wrong, and why genuine excitement might be the most powerful tool in education. One of those conversations that quietly changes how you see the world around you.

I was a guest on the Heber Valley Life Podcast with Rachel Kaler, and this is Part 2 of our conversation about the hard questions shaping Heber Valley right now—growth, housing, and what it actually takes to build a place with long-term beauty and livability.

We dig into the “missing middle,” why zoning often separates communities like “pizza ingredients,” and how historic towns mixed housing types naturally—because the street (not the lot) was the real composition. We talk about why density gets placed on the edges, why form matters as much as use, and why “affordable” doesn’t have to mean “ugly.”

I recently joined the Heber Valley Life Podcast to talk about something that affects all of us: why our valley looks the way it does—and what we can do about it.

We discussed growth, affordability, city codes, and the tension between single-family living and higher density. I shared why “timeless” is really another word for beautiful, why trend-driven design fades fast, and how simple massing, natural materials, proportion, and order still matter. We also dove into how zoning quietly acts as the DNA of a city—and why if we don’t get the code right, we won’t get the outcome right.

If you care about how Heber Valley grows, what replaces open land, and whether new development becomes a contribution or a detraction, this is a conversation worth hearing.

Tune in to Heber Valley Life and let me know what you think.

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/heber-valley-life-building-community-with-rachel-kahler/id1830594627

Episode 3 of 3 in our Education Series In this final episode of my three-part conversation with Paul Monson, Director of Architecture at Utah Valley University, we turn to the practical question of how. How does a student become better prepared for the profession, and how can any of us become more attentive and informed observers of the built environment. We begin with Vitruvius and his description of what an architect should know. It is a demanding standard, but Paul uses it to make a grounded point. Architecture requires breadth, humility, and lifelong learning. The goal is not to master everything at once, but to steadily develop judgment, skill, and clarity. From there, we discuss:

• what is missing in many programs when architecture is taught as theory rather than craft
• how to evaluate an architecture school, including the right questions to ask on a visit
• why UVU is built around accessibility, affordability, and real-world preparation
• why hand drawing remains essential and how it supports clear thinking and design freedom
• how digital tools can shape outcomes if students become limited by software assumptions
• how non-architects can begin training their eye and building design vocabulary
• where to start with resources such as the Institute of Classical Architecture and Art
• and why the built environment is not fate, but choice

We also talk about curriculum, accreditation, learning through making, community-engaged studios, and the importance of developing both technical competence and a refined sense of proportion and beauty. We close with a larger reminder. Beauty is not a luxury. It is deeply connected to human wellbeing, meaning, and culture. Wherever you are, improvement is possible, and it requires participation from everyone involved in building our world.

Episode 2 of 3 in our Education Series

In the second episode of this three-part conversation with Paul Monson, Director of Architecture at Utah Valley University, we move from the foundation of education to the deeper question of why traditional architecture matters at all.Paul and I talk about the origins of the UVU architecture program and why it was intentionally built around craft, practicality, and time-tested principles rather than purely conceptual theory. From there, the conversation widens into the cultural, environmental, and moral implications of how we build.To explain it, we begin with a simple idea: sustainability is not about novelty or technology alone, but about durability, repairability, and stewardship. From throwaway buildings to throwaway materials, Paul makes the case that much of what we call “progress” has quietly eroded our built environment and our sense of place.From there, we explore:

• why traditional architecture is a teachable and learnable language
• how modernism became the default way of building in the twentieth century
• what true sustainability looks like when you consider an entire building’s life cycle
• why local materials and local identity matter more than global sameness
• how tradition can produce diversity rather than imitation
• why the accusation that traditional design is “just copying” misses the point
• and why architects and designers cannot be neutral in shaping the civic realm

We also discuss processed materials, authenticity, modern construction constraints, and how designers can work toward something better even when budgets and systems are imperfect.This episode asks a difficult but necessary question: Are the places we are building today making life better or worse for the people who inhabit them?If you have ever felt uneasy about the way modern buildings age, or why so much of the built world feels disposable and placeless, this conversation puts language to that intuition and explains why the past still has something to teach us.

Episode 1 of 3 in our Education Series

In this first episode of a three-part conversation with Paul Monson, Director of Architecture at Utah Valley University, we start at the foundation: what education is actually meant to do.Paul and I go back nearly twenty years to our time at the University of Notre Dame, and because of that shared background, this conversation is less about credentials and more about transformation. We talk about how architectural education is not just about learning how to design buildings, but about learning how to see the world differently.We begin with Paul’s story, from growing up interested in both art and science, to living in rural Japan, to discovering architecture through craft, construction, and stained glass. Long before he had the language for it, he was absorbing lessons about material, proportion, nature, and beauty.From there, we unpack:

• What education really means as a process of drawing something out
• Why the idea that beauty is purely subjective breaks down
• How Notre Dame challenged modern assumptions about novelty and originality
• Why craft, tradition, and standards still matter
• How great buildings permanently change perception
• Why the environments we live in quietly train us
• How architectural knowledge is passed down through mentorship and practice

We also talk about Japan, classical music, Vitruvius, and why learning to design well is inseparable from learning to live well.This episode sets the stage for the rest of the series by asking a simple question: If education shapes how we see, what happens when we stop teaching people how to recognize what is good, true, and beautiful?If you care about architecture, culture, or how the built world shapes us, this is the place to start.

In 1931, a book called Towards a New Architecture helped launch the modernist movement—and I believe we’re still living with its consequences today. In this episode, I look at the ideas behind that book, not as a book report, but as an exploration of how efficiency, mass production, and the idea of “the house as a machine” reshaped our homes, cities, and understanding of beauty. I walk through the historical moment that produced modernism, how new materials and industrial thinking changed architecture forever, and why so much of what we build today traces back to this shift. And I ask a question I think we need to confront honestly: Was this progress—or something else entirely? This episode is about architecture, culture, and technology—and why the world looks the way it does today.

Episode 3 of 3 in our Zoning SeriesIn this final episode of our three-part deep dive with urban strategist Mike Hathorne, we shift from diagnosing the problems with zoning and density… to exploring the solutions. And the biggest solution is one most people misunderstand: mixed use. To explain it, we start with a simple metaphor—pizza. Modern zoning forces us to eat pizza one ingredient at a time: dough here, sauce there, cheese somewhere else. No wonder it tastes terrible. Mixed use is what happens when the ingredients actually come together the way they always have throughout history.Mike and I unpack:

• What mixed use really means (horizontal vs. vertical, organic vs. regulated)
• Why every beloved historic town on Earth is mixed use—even if people don’t think of it that way
• Why so much modern “mixed use” feels fake or Disneyfied
• The difference between authentic vs. formulaic development
• Why master-planned mixed use often fails
• How to build neighborhoods that evolve flexibly with the market
• Why walkability and human-scale design naturally produce better places
• How mixed use strengthens community, wellbeing, and human flourishing
• Why real estate must become a community-building tool instead of just a financial vehicle

We also talk about authenticity, human-scale design, why new developments feel shallow, how cars changed everything, and why the most successful mixed-use communities grow incrementally, not all at once.This episode closes the loop on zoning, density, mixed use, and the deeper truth beneath them all: our built environment shapes us—and we can choose to shape it back. If you want to feel hopeful about how American neighborhoods can improve, this is the episode.