Picture this: four analytics professionals, one live audience, a bunch of submitted questions, and absolutely no filter when it comes to sharing their real thoughts about AI, stakeholder management, and the state of the industry. That's what you get when the Analytics Power Hour goes live from Marketing Analytics Summit, with Michael, Moe, Tim, and Val fielding everything from, "How do I prove I'm a partner rather than just an order taker?" to "What's your icky threshold with AI?" The conversation ping-ponged from the fundamentals—like why curiosity beats feature checklists when selecting tools—to the controversial, including a heated debate about whether AI-generated meeting notes are helpful productivity boosters or lazy crutches that strip away human editorial judgment. Along the way, they tackled data trust issues, the pressure to show AI efficiency gains, and why trying to nail down the "best" deliverable will just trigger existential musings about what a deliverable even IS! Fair warning: Tim gets triggered by AI hype, Moe calls some industry BS, and everyone agrees that being useful beats being right.

For complete show notes, including links to items mentioned in this episode and a transcript of the show, visit the show page.

What do colors, soup kitchens, and mountain climbing have in common? They're all part of the mental models that have shaped how we think about analytics, and they're exactly the kind of durable wisdom that matters more than ever in an age of AI slop. This campfire-style conversation among the co-hosts reveals the concepts, books, and aha moments that have stuck with us across decades of analytics work. From the magic of randomization to the critical distinction between outputs and outcomes, we share the frameworks that guide our thinking whether we're writing SQL by hand or asking Claude to do it for us. It turns out the most valuable analytics wisdom isn't about tools or techniques—it's about understanding how humans actually make decisions, build trust, and collaborate effectively. Some things never go out of style.

For complete show notes, including links to items mentioned in this episode and a transcript of the show, visit the show page.

What do diamond ring shopping, Uber pricing psychology, and active user metrics gone wrong have in common? They all highlight our complicated relationship with precision versus accuracy—and how that relationship can either build or destroy trust in our data. Arik Friedman from Atlassian joins us to unpack why being "about right" often beats being "exactly wrong," and why your nagging feeling that something's off might be a useful insight in and of itself. From the discipline of documenting assumptions to the art of knowing when to round your numbers, we tackle the very human challenge of working with data that's supposed to be objective but rarely is. Plus, we explore Twyman's Law (if data looks too good to be true, it probably is) and why sometimes your intuition is your last line of defense against embarrassing mistakes.

For complete show notes, including links to items mentioned in this episode and a transcript of the show, visit the show page.