The $3 Million Super Tax Shock
Impossibile aggiungere al carrello
Rimozione dalla Lista desideri non riuscita.
Non è stato possibile aggiungere il titolo alla Libreria
Non è stato possibile seguire il Podcast
Esecuzione del comando Non seguire più non riuscita
-
Letto da:
-
Di:
A policy tweak can sound tidy on a press conference podium, then get very messy the moment it hits real portfolios. The proposed $3 million superannuation tax change is a perfect example: lifting the concessional tax rate to 30% might look targeted, but the way “earnings” are measured raises a bigger issue for SMSFs and anyone holding property or other illiquid assets. If the calculation captures year-to-year movements in value, you can end up facing tax on unrealised gains, even when you haven’t sold a thing and you don’t have spare cash sitting in the fund.
We talk through what that actually means in practice: how the balance movement is worked out, why a paper increase can trigger a bill, and why “lumpy assets” like farms and investment properties are at the centre of the stress. We also unpack the incentives this creates, from valuation disputes to early restructuring into other vehicles such as a family trust, and why we think it’s premature to make big moves while the legislation and political negotiations are still in flux ahead of 2025.
Then we zoom out to the part that affects almost everyone listening: retirement planning for the other 99.5%. If the goal is stronger self-funded retirement and less reliance on the Age Pension, we argue the contribution caps and Super Guarantee settings deserve at least as much attention as headline taxes on high balances. We finish with market talk on Woodside, dividends, franking credits, and why income strategies inside super may matter more if the rules tighten.
If you found this useful, subscribe so you don’t miss the follow-up, share it with someone sorting their super strategy, and leave a quick review with the question you want answered next.
DISCLAIMER: This podcast contains general financial information only. That means the information does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Because of that, you should consider if the information is appropriate to you and your needs, before acting on it. If you’re confused about what that means or what your needs are, you should always consult a licensed and trusted financial planner. Unfortunately, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information in this podcast, including any financial, taxation, and/or legal information. Remember, past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The Rask Group is NOT a qualified tax accountant, financial (tax) adviser, or financial adviser. Access The Rask Group's Financial Services Guide (FSG): https://www.rask.com.au/fsg
Send us Fan Mail
Support the show