The “Crunchy” Language in Human Design & Gene Keys (and Why It Matters) | 246
Impossibile aggiungere al carrello
Rimozione dalla Lista desideri non riuscita.
Non è stato possibile aggiungere il titolo alla Libreria
Non è stato possibile seguire il Podcast
Esecuzione del comando Non seguire più non riuscita
-
Letto da:
-
Di:
A proposito di questo titolo
Some parts of Human Design and Gene Keys feel… crunchy. You read the original transmission, the channel descriptions, the line language—and something in you goes: “Ew. I don't want that. I'm not that.” And if you're not careful, that reaction can quietly turn into self-rejection… which blocks the very transformation you're here for.
In this episode, Hannah Chapman, CFP® and co-host Lauren Ammon talk about why “softening” or rewriting the system to make it more palatable can actually keep people stuck. Together, they explore how to hold uncomfortable language with maturity, use the shadow as soil, and let your experiment reveal what the words truly mean—without moralizing or bypassing the human experience.
Learn about:
-
Why “making HD/GK feel nicer” can be misleading
-
The cost of rejecting parts of your chart
-
Shadow → Gift → Siddhi as a real transformation pathway
-
Gate 59: dishonesty, intimacy, safety, and timing
-
Tribal circuitry and “the bargain” dynamic
-
Gate 26 and the word “manipulation” (and why it isn't always bad)
-
Defined vs open Ego: commitment, promises, and sustainable action
-
How supportive aura dynamics can help people follow through
-
Teaser: the 3/5 profile and why it can feel painful at first
Discover your design, join the newsletter, and explore coaching at: https://expansiveceo.com. Don't forget to send your Human Design questions to lauren@expansiveceo.com!