• DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. v. CALIFORNIA, ET AL. (Federal Election rules and Article III Standing)
    Sep 5 2026

    Send us Fan Mail

    Support the show

    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    24 min
  • NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE, ET AL. v. SHERROD BROWN, ET AL. (Ripeness, Admin Law, Media Discounts for people running for public office).
    Sep 5 2026

    Send us Fan Mail

    The Court did not seem to think the 4th Circuit should have made a ruling on an appeal from the 4th Circuit, therefore they grant a stay of the 4th's Stay.

    Support the show

    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    9 min
  • NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, ET AL. v. NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES (WHITE HOUSE CONSTRUCTION, ARTICLE III STANDING)
    Sep 1 2026

    Send us Fan Mail

    The Supreme Court Thinks the National Trust for Historic Preservation in The United States Does not have Article III Standing. (Simplified)

    Construction on the White House East Wing can resume (Simplified)

    Support the show

    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    17 min
  • WEST VIRGINIA v. B. P. J. (Transgender Athletes, Title IX)
    Jul 1 2026

    Send us Fan Mail

    1. Title IX allows schools to provide separate women’s and men’s sports teams defined by biological sex, and West Virginia has permissibly maintained female sports for biological females consistent with Title IX.

    Support the show

    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    14 min
  • TRUMP v. BARBARA (BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP) RJD Recoding
    Jul 1 2026

    Send us Fan Mail

    Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause.

    Support the show

    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    16 min
  • National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) (Campaign Finance/Election Law)
    Jul 1 2026

    Send us Fan Mail

    In NRSC v. FEC the Supreme Court granted Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit to answer the question of whether the limits imposed by the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) on how much political parties can spend in direct coordination with their federal candidates violate the First Amendment.

    Held: FECA’s political party coordinated expenditure limits violate the First Amendment. Justice Kavanaugh delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C.J., and Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Kagan, J. Filed a dissenting opinion in which Sotomayor and Jackson, JJ., joined.

    Read by Jake A. Leahy.

    Support the show

    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    8 min
  • Trump v. Barbara (Birthright citizenship) JB recording.
    Jul 1 2026

    Send us Fan Mail

    In Trump v. Barbara, the Supreme Court held that children born in the U.S. to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment, striking down Trump's executive order limiting birthright citizenship. The Court relied on the common law rule of jus soli and its precedent in Wong Kim Ark, rejecting the Government's domicile-based theory. Chief Justice Roberts wrote for the Court; Kavanaugh concurred in part and dissented in part, while Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch each dissented.

    Support the show

    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    12 min
  • WATSON v. REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE (Absentee ballots and Election day statutes)
    Jun 29 2026

    Send us Fan Mail

    The federal election-day statutes do not prevent Mississippi from counting absentee ballots postmarked by election day but received up to five days thereafter; nothing in the federal election-day statutes requires ballots to be received by election day.

    Support the show

    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    11 min