Southeast Asia's Superapps Finally Made Money. Do Not Copy How. copertina

Southeast Asia's Superapps Finally Made Money. Do Not Copy How.

Southeast Asia's Superapps Finally Made Money. Do Not Copy How.

Ascolta gratuitamente

Vedi i dettagli del titolo

Offerte di stagione | 0,99 €/mese per i primi 3 mesi

A seguire 9,99 €/mese – si applicano condizioni. Puoi disdire mensilmente.
Three of the biggest companies this region has ever produced just did something they had never done before. They made money.Sea, the Singapore company behind Shopee and Garena, posted a net profit of 487 million US dollars in a single quarter, on 7.8 billion dollars of revenue. GoTo, the Indonesian giant behind Gojek and Tokopedia, booked its second profitable quarter in a row. And Grab, maybe my most hated company in Southeast Asia but the ride hailing app none of us can avoid, is now profitable for a full year and buying back its own stock.If you are a founder, the obvious temptation is to take one lesson from that. Burn. Burn hard, burn big, buy the market, and the profit comes later. That is what the superapps did, and look at them now.I want to talk you out of it. The real story of Southeast Asian tech in 2026 is not that burning worked. It is that Southeast Asia grew up. And the strategy that got these three to profit is the single most dangerous thing a normal founder can copy.THE SHORT VERSION· The burn is not what made them profitable. Discipline in the last two or three years did. The burn is just what they survived.· Two ingredients made it work, and you have neither. A once in a generation land rush, and a backer deep enough to outspend everyone until they died.· Read past the adjusted number. Sea still carries a 6.6 billion dollar hole. GoTo’s real quarterly profit is about 15 million dollars. Grab trades at under a third of its listing price.· Payments is becoming a loss leader for lending. Which means the profit engine of regional fintech is a bet on the credit cycle.· The funding window is not shut. It got selective. That is good news, if you are building something that actually works.1. The scoreboard nobody reads past the headlineStart with the good news, because it is genuinely good.For a decade the knock on Southeast Asian tech was simple. These companies do not make money. They set investor cash on fire to buy growth, and one day the music stops and there is nothing underneath. I said versions of that myself. A lot of us did. Well, the music got quieter, and they adapted.Sea is the cleanest win. Full year 2025, just under 23 billion dollars of revenue and about 1.6 billion dollars of net income. Not adjusted, not massaged. Actual net income. The stock ran from around 102 dollars in late July to about 130 on the back of the quarter. If you held Sea through the pain, you got paid.Now read the fine print, because the fine print is the whole point.SeaThe headline: 487m US dollar net profit in the quarter. 1.6bn net income for FY2025 on about 23bn of revenue.The fine print: Accumulated deficit still around 6.6bn dollars. Two great years have refilled a bit more than 2bn of the hole they dug.GoToThe headline: Second straight profitable quarter. First time crossing 1 trillion rupiah of adjusted profit.The fine print: Actual bottom line net income for the quarter was about 252bn rupiah, roughly 15m US dollars, on a company that size.GrabThe headline: Just under 1bn dollars of quarterly revenue, up 22 percent. Adjusted profit up more than half. 750m dollar buyback.The fine print: Trades around 3 dollars and change against a listing price near 11. Day one shareholders are still deep underwater.The number the headlines love is adjusted, and adjusted quietly removes things like share based compensation and financing costs before it shows you the shiny figure.The burn was vindicated at Sea. It was survived at Grab. It is still being paid off at GoTo. Three outcomes from one strategy, and only one of them is the fairy tale.2. Why the burn worked, and why you have neither ingredientEven for Sea, burning only worked because two things were true at the same time. You need both. You almost certainly have neither.One, this was a genuine land rush. A region of more than 600 million people came online, on mobile, all at once, in categories that really are winner take most. Ride hailing. E commerce. Food delivery. When the prize is a whole region and the market collapses to one or two winners, spending to be that winner can make sense. Most businesses are not like that. Most markets have room for several healthy players, and there, buying share with subsidies just trains your customers to leave the moment you stop paying them.Two, and this is the one people forget. The burn was funded by a capital pipeline almost no founder on earth can access. Sea had Tencent. Grab had SoftBank. GoTo had SoftBank, Alibaba and the biggest names in Indonesia. These companies did not out innovate their rivals. They out funded them. They raised so much, from backers so deep, that they could afford to lose money for longer than the competition could stay alive. The capital was the moat, not the app.So when a founder tells me they are going to run the Grab playbook in their category, I ask one question.Who is your SoftBank?If you do not have a backer willing to fund losses all the way to the horizon, and a market that...
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Ancora nessuna recensione