If you witnessed in the archives of room actual items that were stolen from the Temple in Jerusalem, would that be enough to prove a point?

There was a sage that got entry and saw that the headband of the high priest two words on it were written in one line and not on two lines but the sage is it not except that as definitive.

What could possibly be wrong with that proof?

If you witnessed in the archives of Roma, actual items that were stolen from the Temple in Jerusalem, would that be enough to prove a point?

There was a sage that got entry and saw that the headband of the high priest two words on it were written in one line and not on two lines but the sage is it not except that as definitive.

What could possibly be wrong with that proof?

The Tachash and what its lesson is

Chelek 26, Teruma 3 - Rabbi Shalom Moshe Paltiel

Half Shekel,

Given at once

what is the Tachash skin that was need for donations to the temple?

rashi:kind of animal. that was very colourful.

lesson: hidur mitzvah is the most beautiful way in doing a Mitavah.

what is the Tachash skin that was need for donations to the temple?

rashi:kind of animal. that was very colourful.

lesson: hidur mitzvah is the most beautiful way in doing a Mitavah.

Chelek 26, Mishpatim 3 - Rabbi Shalom Moshe Platiel