Renee Good Shooting (Part 2): Media Double Standards, ICE & Selective Accountability
Impossibile aggiungere al carrello
Rimozione dalla Lista desideri non riuscita.
Non è stato possibile aggiungere il titolo alla Libreria
Non è stato possibile seguire il Podcast
Esecuzione del comando Non seguire più non riuscita
Renee Good Shooting (Part 2): Media Double Standards, ICE & Selective Accountability
-
Letto da:
-
Di:
A proposito di questo titolo
The shooting death of Renee Good sparked national outrage — but Part 2 of this discussion focuses on something deeper: the double standards shaping the media narrative around ICE, law enforcement, and constitutional rights. In this episode, I break down why recording public officials is celebrated as “accountability” in some cases — and suddenly labeled unethical, racist, or invasive when it doesn’t fit the preferred narrative. If public recording is a First Amendment right, it should apply consistently, not selectively. I also address the backlash over officials defending due process, the rush to discredit investigations before facts are known, and why demands for “coordination” with agencies like ICE ignore years of political hostility, leaks, and bad-faith attacks. Accountability requires trust — and trust can’t exist when principles are applied based on convenience. This isn’t about defending or condemning anyone involved in the Renee Good case. It’s about consistency, accountability, and whether we actually mean what we say when we talk about rights.