Psychological Report Writing in the Age of AI: Human Judgment vs. Machine Speed with Dr. Adam Lockwood
Impossibile aggiungere al carrello
Puoi avere soltanto 50 titoli nel carrello per il checkout.
Riprova più tardi
Riprova più tardi
Rimozione dalla Lista desideri non riuscita.
Riprova più tardi
Non è stato possibile aggiungere il titolo alla Libreria
Per favore riprova
Non è stato possibile seguire il Podcast
Per favore riprova
Esecuzione del comando Non seguire più non riuscita
-
Letto da:
-
Di:
A proposito di questo titolo
What happens when AI can write a psychological report in under two minutes — and licensed psychologists take hours? In this episode of Beyond the Couch: AI in Psychology, Dr. Ernest Wayde talks with Dr. Adam Lockwood about the disruptive role of AI in psychological report writing.
They explore how AI compares to human-written reports, where clinicians see value and risks, and what this means for the future of psychology.
Key Takeaways:
- AI-generated reports can match human quality in many areas — and sometimes surpass them in recommendations.
- Clinicians still prefer human summaries, but effect size differences were often small.
- Automation bias and loss of clinical skills remain real risks if AI is used uncritically.
- Bias in AI output reflects societal inequities, making vigilance essential.
- Responsible adoption requires safeguards like HIPAA-compliant agreements and human oversight.
For more of Dr. Lockwood’s insights and commentary on emerging AI research in psychology, visit his blog at LockwoodConsulting.net
Ancora nessuna recensione