Police Accountability And The Cornell Allegations

Impossibile aggiungere al carrello

Puoi avere soltanto 50 titoli nel carrello per il checkout.

Riprova più tardi

Rimozione dalla Lista desideri non riuscita.

Riprova più tardi

Non è stato possibile aggiungere il titolo alla Libreria

Per favore riprova

Non è stato possibile seguire il Podcast

Per favore riprova

Esecuzione del comando Non seguire più non riuscita

Police Accountability And The Cornell Allegations

Ascolta gratuitamente

Vedi i dettagli del titolo

Offerte di stagione | 0,99 €/mese per i primi 3 mesi

A seguire 9,99 €/mese – si applicano condizioni. Puoi disdire mensilmente.

A proposito di questo titolo

We continue our examination of the Krasner controversy as Dawn reacts to the district attorney's decision to release a recorded statement instead of answering questions at a press conference. She discusses earlier legal scrutiny involving Krasner's office, reviews the criminal history attributed to Eric Lewis, and criticizes the handling of repeat offenders. We read Philadelphia Police Commissioner Kevin Bethel's statement emphasizing support for Officer Seiber's family and the department's commitment to examining the prior investigation at the appropriate time. Retired police sergeant Mark Fusetti's criticism raises questions about what prosecutors could have done differently. We also debate police body cameras, prosecutorial discretion, criminal sentencing, and the frustrations officers face when defendants return to the streets. An angry listener's accusation against Nick adds another unexpected confrontation. Our attention shifts to Cornell University and allegations involving seven fraternity members. We discuss the university's restrictions on fraternity gatherings, the civil lawsuit, the absence of criminal charges against the accused men, and the effects of public accusations on the people named in the case. Greg and Nick disagree over how fraternities should be judged, whether broad restrictions punish students who have done nothing wrong, and how universities balance student safety with fairness to the accused. The conversation expands into hazing, campus parties, sexual misconduct allegations, civil litigation, and the conduct expected from university leadership. We also get into the history of politicians discussing alcohol and drug use, with several presidential references adding a lighter turn.

Ancora nessuna recensione