Overthink copertina

Overthink

Overthink

Di: Ellie Anderson Ph.D. and David Peña-Guzmán Ph.D.
Ascolta gratuitamente

3 mesi a soli 0,99 €/mese

Dopo 3 mesi, 9,99 €/mese. Si applicano termini e condizioni.

A proposito di questo titolo

The best of all possible podcasts, Leibniz would say. Putting big ideas in dialogue with the everyday, Overthink offers accessible and fresh takes on philosophy from enthusiastic experts.

Hosted by professors Ellie Anderson (Pomona College) and David M. Peña-Guzmán (San Francisco State University).

© © 2025 Overthink 149604
Filosofia Scienze sociali
  • Manipulation
    Jan 20 2026

    Should we be sympathetic towards manipulators? In episode 157 of Overthink, Ellie and David talk about manipulation. They discuss what makes up a manipulative personality, why manipulators see social interaction as inherently combative, and what you can do when you find yourself entangled with a manipulator. They also explore what Niccolo Machiavelli tell us about the role of manipulation in politics. Should political leaders always be kind? Or, as Machiavelli says, do they need to learn to “be bad”? And what can we say about manipulation outside of politics? Does manipulative behavior require awareness and intention? Are all forms of manipulation inherently bad? And where do we draw the line between manipulation and other types of social influence? In the Substack bonus segment, your hosts discuss how manipulators perform on the ultimatum game and whether philosophy is the only form of non-manipulative discourse.


    Works discussed:

    Anne Barnhill, “How philosophy might contribute to the practical ethics of online manipulation”

    Robert Greene, 48 Laws of Power

    Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince

    George Simon, In Sheep’s Clothing: Understanding and Dealing with Manipulative People


    Enjoy our work? Support Overthink via tax-deductible donation: https://www.givecampus.com/fj0w3v

    Join our Substack for ad-free versions of both audio and video episodes, extended episodes, exclusive live chats, and more: https://overthinkpod.substack.com/

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    58 min
  • Closer Look: Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man
    Jan 13 2026

    How do new forms of social control under capitalism foreclose the possibility of social critique? In episode 156 of Overthink, Ellie and David take a deep dive into Herbert Marcuse’s 1964 classic, One-Dimensional Man. Marcuse analyzes how 1950s conformism narrows the private space of human thinking, turning us into one-dimensional beings. Your hosts talk about Marcuse’s diagnosis of life under capitalism, and his assessment of how analytic philosophy’s obsession with formal logic encourages conservatism and prevents us from subversive thought. In the Substack bonus segment, your hosts discuss what freedom looks like for Marcuse and how critical Marcuse would be of Overthink.Works Discussed:

    Herbert Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man

    Stephen Whitfield, “Refusing Marcuse: 50 Years After One-Dimensional Man”

    Paul Mattick, "One Dimensional Man In Class Society"


    Enjoy our work? Support Overthink via tax-deductible donation: https://www.givecampus.com/fj0w3v

    Join our Substack for ad-free versions of both audio and video episodes, extended episodes, exclusive live chats, and more: https://overthinkpod.substack.com/

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    59 min
  • Treason
    Jan 6 2026

    Do we ever have a duty to commit treason? In episode 155 of Overthink, Ellie and David talk about “the crime of crimes.” They look at the emergence of this legal concept and its evolution over time, and discuss some of the most important historical cases involving treason: Benedict Arnold, Aaron Burr, and John Brown. Can we say that treason is always bad when America's founding itself depended on an act of treason? Who is capable of committing a treasonous act? And is treason ever morally permissible? In the Substack bonus segment, your hosts discuss how treason is seen in Hobbes’ political philosophy and whether we need to recover insurrection as a political possibility.

    Works Discussed:

    Neil Cartlidge, “Treason,” The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Law and Literature

    Cécile Fabre, “The Morality of Treason”

    George P. Fletcher, “The Case for Treason”

    Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish

    Phyllis Greenacre, “Treason and the Traitor”

    Leonard Harris, “Honor and Insurrection or A Short Story about why John Brown (with David Walker’s Spirit) was Right and Frederick Douglass (with Benjamin Banneker’s Spirit) was Wrong”

    Lee McBride, “Insurrectionary Ethics and Racism”


    Enjoy our work? Support Overthink via tax-deductible donation: https://www.givecampus.com/fj0w3v

    Join our Substack for ad-free versions of both audio and video episodes, extended episodes, exclusive live chats, and more: https://overthinkpod.substack.com/

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    59 min
Ancora nessuna recensione