Odin was not a Trojan war refugee!!
Impossibile aggiungere al carrello
Rimozione dalla Lista desideri non riuscita.
Non è stato possibile aggiungere il titolo alla Libreria
Non è stato possibile seguire il Podcast
Esecuzione del comando Non seguire più non riuscita
-
Letto da:
-
Di:
While modern retellings often claim that Snorri Sturluson’s Prose Edda identifies Odin as an escaped refugee from the Trojan War, a careful reading of the sources reveals that the text actually makes a very different claim.
The primary argument that Odin was not a Trojan War refugee is built on the following evidence from the sources:
1. The Generational Gap
Snorri does not place Odin at the beginning of the Trojan story alongside King Priam. Instead, the Prose Edda Prologue describes a long succession of descendants—roughly eighteen generations—between the royal house of Troy and the arrival of Vóden (Odin). The sequence begins with Priam and a figure named Trór (identified with Thor), then moves through names like Lóridi, Einridi, and others before reaching Odin. If the writer had intended to portray Odin as a refugee of the war, there would be no reason to list nearly twenty generations of fathers and sons between Priam and Odin.
2. Chronological Impossibility
The Trojan War is typically dated to the end of the Bronze Age (c. 1200 BC). If Odin were a direct refugee from the fall of Priam's city, it would be impossible for him to appear over a thousand years later during the Migration Period timelines (c. 250–500 AD) usually linked to these legends. The sources suggest that the migration only begins after the genealogy is complete, with Odin leading a company of people out of "Turkland" to the north.
3. The Conflation of Claims
Modern interpretations often incorrectly collapse three separate propositions into one:
- Trojan Ancestry: Odin claimed descent from a Trojan line.
- Personal Residence: Odin personally lived in a place called Troy.
- Trojan War Chronology: Odin lived during the reign of Priam and the war. The sources show that a leader could claim prestigious descent from an ancient royal city without having lived there during its most famous historical event.
4. "Which Troy?"
Archaeology shows that the site of Troy (Hisarlık) was occupied, destroyed, and rebuilt for over 4,000 years, continuing as a political and religious center well into the Greek and Roman periods. A family could have left the Troad during the Hellenistic or Roman periods and still claimed Trojan identity long after Priam. Medieval Icelanders also possessed literature, such as the Trójumanna saga, which acknowledged that Troy had been destroyed and rebuilt multiple times.
5. Medieval Prestige Packaging
Claiming Trojan ancestry was a widespread "prestige fiction" in medieval Europe. Romans, Franks, and Britons all used Troy to give their dynasties antiquity and legitimacy. The Trojan framework was likely medieval packaging used to explain a much older, persistent memory of an eastern homeland near the Black Sea and Tanais (Don River). Once the Trojan "literary clothing" is stripped away, what remains is a consistent tradition of a human warlord leading a migration from the East.
In summary, the sources indicate that Odin was remembered as the latest inheritor of a prestigious line, using Trojan ancestry as a claim to authority rather than being a direct participant in the Bronze Age conflict.