Men Sue Uber; Women Just Want To Get Home Safely
Impossibile aggiungere al carrello
Rimozione dalla Lista desideri non riuscita.
Non è stato possibile aggiungere il titolo alla Libreria
Non è stato possibile seguire il Podcast
Esecuzione del comando Non seguire più non riuscita
-
Letto da:
-
Di:
A proposito di questo titolo
Send us a text
Who gets the ride and at what cost? A new lawsuit claims that women-only rideshare options discriminate against men, but the real issue runs deeper. In this episode of The E Word, Karen and Brittany explore what happens when product design, legal frameworks, and lived experience collide.
We break down Uber’s safety data, how Safety Risk Assessed Dispatch (SRAD) works, and the early signs that smarter routing may reduce harm. Then we go deeper: supply constraints, driver demographics, and why fairness looks different when risk isn’t equally distributed. Through the SPENT framework, we look at how real safety measures (Phronesis + Techne) can coexist with legal scrutiny (Episteme), public perception (Nous), and long-term policy reform (Sophia).
This isn’t just about ridesharing. It’s about designing systems that protect without excluding, and understanding how gender, equity, and safety shape how we move through the world.
Support the show
Stay With Us
- Watch and Subscribe to The E Word on YouTube.
- Follow Karen on LinkedIn and learn more at Colossal Work.
- Follow Brittany on LinkedIn and learn more at BND Consulting Group.