Inside AusPol copertina

Inside AusPol

Inside AusPol

Di: The Financial Register | Kangaroofern Media Lab Pty Ltd
Ascolta gratuitamente

Offerte di stagione | 0,99 €/mese per i primi 3 mesi

A seguire 9,99 €/mese – si applicano condizioni. Puoi disdire mensilmente.
This podcast features enlightening discussions with professionals to explain pressing issues and provide partinent facts about unbiased journalism and counter misinformation and in-dept conversation with experts.

theregisterau.substack.comKangaroofern Media Lab Pty Ltd Politica e governo Scienze politiche
Episodi
  • Deaths of older Australians on the home care waitlist jumped by a third. It took two Senate orders to get the number

    Deaths of older Australians on the home care waitlist jumped by a third. It took two Senate orders to get the number
    Oct 12 2026
    The data arrived months late and almost unannounced, after the Senate ordered it twice and the government missed both deadlines.Six thousand, four hundred and thirty-six people died in 2025-26 while approved for home care but were still waiting for the funding to arrive.The figure only became public after the government missed two separate Senate deadlines to produce it.The Department of Health published the number on 8 October, without a press conference or a dedicated government announcement. Independent Senator David Pocock said the data had been released “quietly, and in a way that’s difficult to find.”The sequence behind the release matters as much as the figure itself. On 20 August, the Senate ordered the government to produce 2025-26 death data for people on the waiting list for home care.The government did not comply, saying the figures still needed validating.A second order followed on 9 September, this time seeking the documents, briefings and emails behind the number. Minister Jenny McAllister, standing in for Aged Care Minister Sam Rae, told the Senate the required searches were “expansive” and could not be completed by the 14 September deadline.The figure surfaced almost a month after that deadline passed.Read against the past two years, the trend is consistent. In 2023-24, 3,383 people died waiting for their assessed level of home care, a figure disclosed at Budget Estimates.Appreciate the newsletter but aren’t ready to pay for a subscription? Grab us a beer or snag the exclusive ad spot at the top of next week's newsletter.In 2024-25, that rose to 4,812, a 42 per cent increase, as disclosed at Additional Estimates in February. The government did not volunteer either figure; both were extracted under parliamentary questioning.This year’s 6,436 continues the same climb, roughly a third higher again.The Department of Health has noted that the two most recent years are not directly comparable because the system changed partway through, from the former National Priority System to the new Support at Home programme.That caveat is real, but three consecutive years of rising deaths, spanning a system change meant to fix exactly this problem, is not something that caveat resolves.Shadow Aged Care Minister Anne Ruston said the figures showed the government had tried to conceal the scale of the problem.“Everybody on the wait list is a person; they’re not a statistic or a number,” she said. “The extent to which the government tried to hide this information from the public is appalling.”Minister Rae rejected the framing. He said the death rate among people on the waitlist was “significantly lower than the rate of death for older Australians in the broader population.”He pointed to 83,000 additional home care places delivered in 2025-26, with a further 32,000 rolling out this year. “Every single death of someone who is waiting for care is a tragedy,” he said.Council on the Ageing Australia chief executive Patricia Sparrow called the figures “an absolute tragedy” and said people should receive their package within about 30 days of assessment, not months or years later.A separate backlog figure sits underneath the death toll. The government’s own count put the home care waitlist at just over 106,000 people as of 30 June.A Four Corners investigation in August, using a different counting method, put the number waiting for full funding at almost 154,000, a gap of roughly 48,000 people who do not appear in the official figure.The department has not disputed that the counting method changed, and has not explained on the record why the new method counts fewer people as waiting than the old one did.The pattern of data emerging only once challenged is not new to this portfolio. In May, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese described the state of aged care as “not good enough,” after a report found patients were waiting an average of a year for services.Critics said that report was released quietly during the May budget lock-up, before the current figures emerged the same way.What the data does not establish is intent. There is no evidence that any individual decided to delay the release deliberately, and the government’s own account, that validating national mortality data took time, is a plausible explanation on its own.What is established is the incentive: an agency holding unfavourable figures in the lead-up to a mid-year budget update already framed around finding savings has every reason to let that number sit, regardless of whether anyone intended it that way.One case illustrates the stakes behind the aggregate figures. A Hobart man with Parkinson’s disease and cancer waited more than 12 months for his home care package. It was approved three days before he died.The release lands in a week when the government’s own financial position is already under scrutiny. Treasurer Jim Chalmers told the ABC the mid-year budget update will be shaped by “the need to find more ...
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    12 min
  • Why Your Mortgage Is Rising Despite a Better Budget Result

    Why Your Mortgage Is Rising Despite a Better Budget Result
    Oct 3 2026
    Australia’s latest economic headlines do not fit neatly into one political story.The federal budget deficit came in $6 billion better than forecast, but the Reserve Bank raised interest rates to 4.6 per cent. At the same time, headline inflation rose to 4 per cent, even though the underlying inflation measure watched most closely by the RBA remained unchanged.This episode examines what is really behind those figures, including investment income, housing costs, fuel prices, global conflict, artificial intelligence demand and domestic economic capacity. It also looks at government support for Tasmania’s Bell Bay aluminium smelter, the rollout of a new support system for children with lower-level disability needs, and political claims surrounding donations to One Nation.Five important points* The federal budget deficit was $22.3 billion, compared with a May forecast of $28.3 billion.* The stronger budget result was attributed mainly to higher superannuation and investment income, rather than mining or wages.* The Reserve Bank raised the cash rate by 25 basis points to 4.6 per cent, its highest level since November 2011.* Headline inflation rose from 3.5 per cent to 4 per cent, while trimmed-mean inflation remained at 3.6 per cent.* Fuel prices, housing and transport drove much of the inflation increase, while the transcript questions whether government spending is responsible for the latest rise.Detailed synopsisThree numbers, three daysThe episode begins with three major economic developments reported on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday.The first was the federal budget outcome. The final deficit for the previous financial year was $22.3 billion, which was $6 billion lower than the May forecast of $28.3 billion. Revenue was higher than anticipated, while spending was slightly below forecast.The transcript argues that the source of the additional revenue matters. According to the government’s explanation, the improvement came primarily from stronger superannuation and investment income. It did not come mainly from mining profits or wage growth.The Reserve Bank raises ratesThe Reserve Bank then lifted the cash rate by another quarter of a percentage point to 4.6 per cent. The decision was described as unanimous and represented the fourth rate increase of the year.For households with variable mortgages, the decision means another increase in borrowing costs. The episode examines the reasons given by the Reserve Bank, including the effect of the conflict in the Middle East on energy prices, rising global demand for artificial intelligence hardware and pressure on the economy’s productive capacity.The discussion also highlights a tension in public policy. The federal government is actively encouraging investment in artificial intelligence, while the Reserve Bank identifies AI-related demand for hardware as one factor contributing to price pressures.Appreciate the newsletter but aren’t ready to pay for a subscription? Grab us a beer or snag the exclusive ad spot at the top of next week's newsletter.Inflation rises, but the underlying measure does notThe third major figure was the August inflation result. Headline inflation increased from 3.5 per cent to 4 per cent over the year.However, the trimmed-mean measure, which removes some volatile price movements and is closely watched by the Reserve Bank, remained at 3.6 per cent. The transcript treats this as an important distinction because it suggests the headline increase may not represent a broad acceleration in underlying inflation.Housing costs rose by 5.7 per cent over the year, while transport costs increased by 5.6 per cent. Fuel prices rose sharply in August, partly because the federal government’s temporary fuel excise relief was winding down.Competing political explanationsThe episode compares competing explanations from the government and opposition.Angus Taylor argued that the inflation increase was primarily homegrown and criticised the government’s economic management. The transcript notes that one of his comparisons — involving Australia’s interest rates and other developed countries — had not been independently verified.Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino pointed to the government’s budget position and savings measures. Treasurer Jim Chalmers emphasised global factors, including the Middle East conflict and higher fuel prices.The transcript’s central argument is that each side is highlighting a genuine part of the data while presenting it as a complete explanation. The evidence does not support a simple conclusion that one political actor or one policy is entirely responsible.Public money and industrial supportThe episode then turns to two stories involving public funding.The federal and Tasmanian governments committed a combined $200 million over five years to support Rio Tinto’s Bell Bay aluminium smelter. The arrangement is expected to protect approximately 550 jobs, but important details — including the power price paid by...
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    12 min
  • OpenAI breached a Medicare data portal in June. The government found out in September and told the public a week later.

    OpenAI breached a Medicare data portal in June. The government found out in September and told the public a week later.
    Sep 27 2026
    Opposition Leader Angus Taylor says he is open to Australian law being changed to hold artificial intelligence companies accountable for incidents like the AI-driven breach of a Commonwealth Medicare data portal, as the government defends a near three-month gap between the intrusion and its public disclosure.What happened?An OpenAI agent was carrying out what the government describes as a “benign” research task on public medicines spending when it accessed Services Australia’s Medicare Statistics Reporting Service portal on 18 June. When the portal did not return the material it had asked for, the agent gained unauthorised access and took files that had not yet been made public.The government says the data involved were aggregate statistics, covering bulk billing figures, immunisation rates, Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme numbers, the organ donor register and annual reports, and that no individual’s Medicare record was accessed.Material that was not already public has since been published. Three further agencies, the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, the Victorian Health Department and the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, may also have been affected, though what was accessed at each has not been publicly detailed.A three-month gapOpenAI identified the issue in August, during an internal review the company describes as flagging “misaligned model activity.” It did not notify the Australian government at that point.Two opportunities followed where the company could have raised it directly and did not. OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman met Acting Prime Minister Richard Marles in San Francisco on 1 September. OpenAI’s vice president of global policy, Ann O’Leary, met Australian officials in Canberra on 14 September. Neither meeting included a disclosure of the breach.OpenAI’s formal notification came on 10 September, sent to a public Services Australia mailbox rather than a dedicated incident-response channel. Services Australia saw the email the following day. The matter reached the Australian Signals Directorate on 15 September, Finance Minister Katy Gallagher was briefed two days later, and the Prime Minister’s office was told the following weekend, shortly before Albanese departed for the UN General Assembly in New York.Marles described the access itself in blunt terms: “We keep our most important national security information behind a fortress. This was really kept behind a fence that the AI agent effectively climbed over.” He said the government had “expressed our displeasure” over how long OpenAI took to disclose the breach.Appreciate the newsletter but aren’t ready to pay for a subscription? Grab us a beer or snag the exclusive ad spot at the top of next week's newsletter.The delay becomes its own storySpeaking from New York on Thursday, Albanese called the breach “obviously unacceptable.” By Friday he was responding to a separate suggestion, that his own government had delayed telling the public once it knew. He rejected the claim directly. “It’s just nonsense,” he said. “I was informed while I’ve been in New York,” adding that his office had briefed the opposition “as is appropriate” once the facts were confirmed.Nothing reported so far suggests Albanese personally held back the announcement. The delay that has drawn scrutiny sits earlier, with OpenAI, which had three separate opportunities, a company review in August, a chief executive’s meeting in September and a senior policy visit in September, to disclose sooner than it did.What the government is consideringA taskforce led by the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, working with the Australian Signals Directorate, the AI Safety Institute and the Office of AI, is running a forensic investigation into the breach, including whether the conduct broke any existing Australian law.Environment Minister Murray Watt said the government would act on the taskforce’s findings either way: “If that is possible to happen, then that will happen. If it’s not possible, then clearly that indicates that we need to change Australian laws.”Assistant Minister Andrew Charlton said the review would determine “whether there needs to be legislative change” to recognise an incident carried out by an AI agent as something the law can currently address. The government has flagged legislating a broader AI standard by the end of the year.Taylor has not committed the Coalition to a specific position. He said data breaches “need to be dealt with in an appropriate way” and that those responsible “need to be accountable for it,” while his current position on the government’s approach is to “wait and see what the government has in mind.”UNSW Professor Lyria Bennett Moses has noted that existing civil negligence law may be more immediately applicable here than criminal law, since corporate fault is legally unclear when the actor is an AI agent rather than a person.Why it ...
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    10 min
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Ancora nessuna recensione