The Regulatory State(s): AI Safeguards, Deregulation for Affordability’s Sake
Impossibile aggiungere al carrello
Rimozione dalla Lista desideri non riuscita.
Non è stato possibile aggiungere il titolo alla Libreria
Non è stato possibile seguire il Podcast
Esecuzione del comando Non seguire più non riuscita
The Regulatory State(s): AI Safeguards, Deregulation for Affordability’s Sake
-
Letto da:
-
Di:
With polls showing the public wanting more government oversight of artificial intelligence – AI leaders themselves begging Congress and the White House to step in – what’s a sensible path forward at both the federal and state levels? Patrick McLaughlin, the Hoover Institution’s Shepard Family Fellow in Economics, discusses how to avoid what he calls “the 50-state tollbooth problem” for AI – as in shipping on the Rhine in medieval Germany, a challenge in keeping traffic moving without too many inconveniences. Also discussed: why regulatory reform and the concept of lowering consumers' prices by thinning red tape isn’t part of the election-year conversation, how Idaho, Virginia and British Columbia made deregulation work in their respective lands, and what a pair of November ballot initiatives in California – one promising more affordable housing, the other addressing a notorious environmental statute – say about life in America’s most regulated state.
RELATED SOURCES
- FRONTIER Act
- TAKE IT DOWN Act
- The Fifty-State Tollbooth Problem for AI
- Data Transport, AI and Growth
- How Do Federal Regulations Affect Consumer Prices? An Analysis of the Regressive Effects of Regulation
- Regulation and the Cost of Moving Goods
- 2026 Economic Report of the President
- The Cumulative Cost of Regulations