The Clinical Gavel -Criminal Law Cases copertina

The Clinical Gavel -Criminal Law Cases

The Clinical Gavel -Criminal Law Cases

Di: Circle Of Insight Productions
Ascolta gratuitamente

A proposito di questo titolo

 Welcome to The Clinical Gavel where a seasoned Forensic Psychology Professor delves into the intricate world of criminal law. Join us as we break down complex legal concepts, explore high-profile cases, and provide insights into the workings of the justice system. Each episode offers expert analysis and engaging discussions to help you understand the laws that govern our society and the psychology behind criminal behavior. Tune in to gain a deeper appreciation of criminal law from an insider’s perspective.Copyright Circle Of Insight Productions
Episodi
  • The Right to Refuse Treatment – Riggins v. Nevada (1992)

    The Right to Refuse Treatment – Riggins v. Nevada (1992)
    Apr 21 2026
    In this episode, we examine Riggins v. Nevada (1992), a landmark Supreme Court case addressing whether the state can forcibly administer antipsychotic medication to a criminal defendant awaiting trial. The Court ruled that while forced medication is not categorically prohibited, the state must demonstrate it is medically appropriate and the least restrictive means of achieving competency for trial. The decision protects the defendant’s due process rights and the integrity of the adversarial process by ensuring a defendant can present a defense as themselves, not as a pharmacologically altered version shaped by the state.
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    5 min
  • Chemical Intent: The Limits of “Roid Rage” in Criminal Law

    Chemical Intent: The Limits of “Roid Rage” in Criminal Law
    Apr 19 2026
    A forensic psychology and criminal law podcast analyzing “roid rage,” anabolic steroid effects on the brain, and how courts evaluate mens rea (criminal intent), voluntary intoxication, and legal responsibility in violent crime cases. This episode breaks down the intersection of neuroscience, behavioral evidence, and legal standards, featuring high-profile cases like Oscar Pistorius and legal precedents such as People v. Hood and R v. Kingston to examine why steroid defenses often fail in court. Designed for audiences interested in true crime, white collar crime, legal analysis, and clinical psychology, this content targets people who like topics such as criminal defense strategy, expert witness testimony, mental state defenses, and the psychology of violent offenders.
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    14 min
  • The matrix defense: State v. Ansley

    The matrix defense: State v. Ansley
    Apr 17 2026
    2 min
Ancora nessuna recensione