CMO Field Notes with Ant Hodges copertina

CMO Field Notes with Ant Hodges

CMO Field Notes with Ant Hodges

Di: Ant Hodges
Ascolta gratuitamente

A proposito di questo titolo

 Field notes and insights from a Fractional CMO in the modern marketing world.

www.cmofieldnotes.comAnt Hodges Economia Marketing Marketing e vendite
Episodi
  • Ep 11 - The Trap of Employing a Full Time CMO

    Ep 11 - The Trap of Employing a Full Time CMO
    Apr 20 2026
    I’ve just come off a call with a client. And it’s kind of one of those calls that you kind of wish you’d had a few months before, because this client was somebody that I worked with.I acted as an interim CMO for a period of about 6 months while they were really looking at recruitment for a new full-time CMO in their business. It was as a direct result of somebody leaving the company. So, they needed somebody interim while they recruited and give like a 30 day handover and all of those kind of things.For the project itself, we started in the same way I do with all of my clients. We had a full one day meeting, it started with the CEO and his co-founder, and then it progressed to working with the marketing team, and then the sales team and then the sales team and marketing team together. That was the whole day in their office and it was an amazing time.We, I gathered so much information, we worked out so many different things, we looked at what we could subtract and simplify. As a direct result, the next week I delivered a full strategy for the next 6 months containing 2 different identified sprints and simplified KPIs that we would measure for the direct implementation of simplified campaigns - and we hit the ground running. There was really no kind of delay or anything like that.I got asked questions like, do you think we should simplify our brand? Do you think we should change our logo? What about this? And none of that came up because what I was focussed on were the numbers. It’s about, for me, a CMO is about connecting activity to revenue. What’s the return on investment for the activity that you’re producing?That was the first 6 months we had less than a 30 day handover because the person who was due to be starting as their new CMO was recruited, and they were delayed by starting by a week, and my contract was ending within 3 weeks - it was okay, the CEO was cool with this.In hand over. I focussed on what we were doing, the KPIs that we measured, the simplification that we brought into the business. I the call I just got off with was the CEO of the same company.It’s been 2.5 months of the new CMO in place and he called me up and he said, have you got capacity to take us on again? And I’m like, “Oh what’s happened?” And what’s happened is the typical thing that a CMO will do when they come in.They did a brand audit, which took the 1st month. And that brand audit was, is everybody compliant around messaging? Do we need to change it? They did a survey of customers. They did an internal survey and then month 2 was the start of a rebrand project.The CMO’s focus From the moment that they started was not necessarily around. The campaigns and the measurement of things, they basically just let the marketing team run with those things. But the focus was on brand, on colours, colouring in, and logos, and how pink and fluffy things looked.(Their brand is not pink and fluffy, but you get what I mean!)It’s the things that really don’t matter too much when a business is wanting a CMO to come on board to really focus on how the marketing is performing. In my mind, this role of a CMO, as I’ve said, is to connect marketing activity to revenue. That’s got to be the number one priority.But the number one priority in so many CMOs is, are we positioning the brand right? Do we change who our target audience is? Is our messaging right? Do our logos match? Is our stock photography? Is our video? All of this, all of the positioning elements, is that right?This is not a wrong thing to focus on, but when you’re getting into the new role of a CMO, you want to make a big difference. You want to improve the bottom line and actually, fundamentally, this is why I start with a simplified day. One day to get all of that kind of strategy nailed, to see what we can simplify so that we can hit the ground running where we jump into a retainer. When we jump into a retainer, we focus on those elements that need to be worked on, that will connect revenue to activity. Once those systems are working well, and you’ve got a well oiled machine, that’s where you can start to redefine what you’ve got and ask the question, do we need a rebrand? It’s not the 1st question you ask when you’re coming in because you need to understand and work from data. Do these campaigns work? Does this activity work? All of that kind of stuff.If you’re coming in new as a CMO to any kind of organisation or business, you need the data to be able to make those judgements. So, run the campaigns for at least the first month, 60 days, 90 days even, before you even get into making things look pretty, changing the colour of the logo, putting the pink and fluffy elements to everything.Step away from the crayons and step into the data. That’s my big thing. Connect revenue with marketing activity.If I can help, if there’s something that, you know, has resonated with this and you’re a founder or CEO, of a company, where you ...
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    8 min
  • Ep 10 - The Right Time to Hire a Fractional CMO

    Ep 10 - The Right Time to Hire a Fractional CMO
    Apr 17 2026
    My name is Ant Hodges. I’m a fractional CMO. I work with clients anywhere between $1m and $50m a year, under 100 employees, and they’re looking for someone to come in and take away the de facto marketing role that the CEO and founder has ended up doing. I take that away from them and bring in real marketing leadership.Fractional CMO work is one of the things I absolutely love, because it’s about connecting marketing activity to revenue. And it has to be that way round.It’s not about spending the first 90 days on vision, mission, values, messaging, branding, and positioning. That’s not what a fractional CMO should be doing. A fractional CMO comes in and connects revenue to activity. From day one.The right time to hire a fractional CMO is when you as the CEO and founder are running ragged. Every marketing person in your business is coming to you for answers. You’re the one who has to come up with the ideas. You’re stuck in that 11am Monday marketing meeting every week - and you need to get out.Because your job is to lead and steer the whole company. Not run the marketing.There’s a number showing up in several pieces of research that I think is worth explaining. The argument is that the point at which hiring a full-time CMO makes more economic sense than a fractional engagement is around $25 to $30 million in annual revenue.Below that, the maths are almost always different for fractional. A full-time CMO in 2026 is carrying a base salary of between $245,000 and $500,000, plus benefits, plus equity, plus recruitment costs, plus the six months it typically takes before they’re producing at full capacity. A fractional engagement at the same strategic level runs at a fraction of that - and it should start delivering in weeks, not months.Above $30 million, the business usually needs a dedicated full-time leader. I do work with clients up to $50m, but at that stage I’m often there to provide leadership while they bring the full-time person on board. The decisions are too frequent, the team too large, and the function too complex for a part-time engagement to carry it properly.But the number itself is less interesting than what it implies. A business between $1m and $25m that doesn’t have a marketing leader of any kind - where the founder is still doing it, or someone on the team has been given the title without the authority or the experience - that’s a real problem.I worked with a family business last year doing around $8 million. The wife of the founder had been given the CMO title because she had a marketing degree. I was brought in as a fractional CMO because she needed pointing in the right direction. No disrespect to her - she was the first to admit it. But it’s a typical story. You’ve got a solid business, a solid offer, you want to grow and scale it - and the de facto marketing person is well-meaning but not equipped to lead from that level of experience.Marketing should run without the direction of the CEO and founder. It should run with clarity, with reports that produce real accountability, and a team that knows where it’s going because it’s being led properly.The business should grow in spite of the CEO and founder not being involved in the marketing. That’s the goal.The fractional model exists to solve a specific problem. The business has reached the point where founder-led marketing is no longer enough, but a full-time executive is either too expensive or too much of a commitment given where the business is currently at. That gap - between doing it yourself and hiring full-time - is where the model earns its value.The mistake I see most businesses make is waiting too long to fill it. They wait until the marketing is visibly broken. Until campaigns aren’t converting. Until the team is wandering from AI tool to AI tool without direction. Until the founder is exhausted from carrying both the business and the marketing function at the same time. By that point, the cost of the gap is already significant.The better question to ask isn’t whether you can afford senior marketing leadership.The better question is: what is the absence of it already costing you?For most businesses between $1m and $25m, that number is greater than the cost of the engagement.And that sweet spot around $25m is also where the fractional role starts to look different - where it shifts from ongoing leadership to helping you bring a full-time person in properly. Some fractional CMOs will have my guts for saying that. But the reality is, if you’re still hanging around as a fractional at $30m, $40m, $50m without moving toward a full-timer, you’re doing the business a disservice. They need someone in full-time at that stage.If you’re between $1m and $25m, or even up to $50m and in transition - let’s have a conversation. We can have a short chat to see where the gap is and how a fractional role could help. Head over to www.anthodges.com, hit the chat button, or book a call.Let’s start ...
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    8 min
  • Ep 9 - Will AI Replace the Fractional CMO?

    Ep 9 - Will AI Replace the Fractional CMO?
    Apr 15 2026

    There’s a conversation running through almost every forum, comment section, and LinkedIn thread I see. I hear it at events and on stages. It goes something like this: AI is getting better and faster - so why would any business pay for a senior marketing leader when they can get the same input from a tool?

    It’s a fair question. But I think it’s the wrong question.

    And most of the answers being given are defensive. Lists of things AI can’t do. Arguments about human creativity. Reasons why the role is safe. That defensiveness is very telling. Why would you get so defensive about something if you weren’t a little worried yourself?

    AI won’t replace judgment. That’s the one thing it can’t do. It amplifies whatever is already present.

    In a business with a clear strategy, a well-understood customer, strong offers, and a team that knows what it’s doing - AI is genuinely powerful. It accelerates execution. It reduces friction. It produces more output.

    But in a business without those things? AI produces far more noise, far faster.

    I’ve been watching this play out in real time inside businesses I work with. Teams are adopting AI tools enthusiastically. Output is going up. In some of those businesses, results are moving with it. In others, they’re not.

    What’s happening in the ones that aren’t moving? Everyone’s getting lost in the activity - doing things, making movement - without building momentum. We don’t need movement and action. We need momentum and results.

    That’s the real mistake in the ‘AI versus marketing leader’ framing. The right question is whether AI running on top of good strategic leadership produces better outcomes than AI running without it. The answer is consistently yes.

    Harvard Business Review published research this year on where senior leaders are struggling with AI adoption. The core finding was that the problem isn’t the tools - it’s the clarity gaps underneath them. When leadership hasn’t made hard decisions about positioning, offers, audiences, and priorities, AI surfaces those gaps rather than filling them.

    It’s like boiling a pan - all the imperfections come to the surface. That’s what AI is doing. You end up with sophisticated output that doesn’t convert, because the strategy it’s executing was never clear to begin with.

    What AI is genuinely replacing is the execution layer. The tactical work. Content at scale, campaign variations, data analysis, reporting, automation. A lot of what junior marketing teams spent their time on is now being automated. And that’s fine.

    What it isn’t replacing is the decision-making layer. What to say, who to say it to, where to prioritise, what to stop, how to read a market that’s shifting. That layer still requires someone with experience and accountability.

    You can’t build a house on sand. Build AI on weak foundations, and when the storms come, it washes away.

    The fractional CMOs who should be worried are the ones operating at the execution layer anyway - the ones calling themselves CMOs while doing the work of a marketing manager. Those carrying genuine strategic authority? AI isn’t a threat. It’s about to become the best productivity tool the role has ever had.

    So to answer the question at the top: will AI replace the fractional CMO? In some cases, yes - it will weed out those who aren’t actually performing at a true CMO level. Those who are connecting marketing activity to revenue, doing the real leadership work, they’re going to win. AI will amplify what they’re doing and make it even better.

    Everything I do as a fractional CMO starts with simplification. We start with a Simplify Day before any retainer. Then 90-day sprints over 12 months. We get into work straight away - subtracting, focusing, simplifying - to bring revenue in as quickly as possible. No pink fluffy dice. No crayons in the first 90 days. Just revenue.

    Head over to www.anthodges.com if you want a conversation. There’s a chat button or you can book a call. Wherever you’re listening to this - subscribe, comment, let me know what you think. Three of these a week. Short, bite-sized, straight to the point.

    I’m Ant Hodges. Let’s simplify.



    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.cmofieldnotes.com
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    9 min
Ancora nessuna recensione