Eye on the Target - TARGETHING - Talking Guns copertina

Eye on the Target - TARGETHING - Talking Guns

Eye on the Target - TARGETHING - Talking Guns

Di: Radio@targething.com (Rob Campbell & Amanda Suffecool)
Ascolta gratuitamente

Live over the airwaves Salem Radio that is a Q&A related to personal protection, the 2nd amendment, guns, the shooting sports industry. Recorded live on SALEM at 5:00 pm est. Listen to the Podcasts, catch us live, or email in your questions to be covered on the next show. Radio@Targething.com. Our discussions include guns, pepper spray, defensive techniques, concealed carry, NRA, firearms, safety and a variety of others as the show is led by the originating topic and the questions asked by our listeners. Amanda Suffecool, Rob Campbell work to make the show lively and topical. Enjoy - Amanda2022
  • 6726 hr2
    Jun 8 2026
    This episode of Eye on the Target Radio featured hosts Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell, along with guest Charlie Cook of Riding Shotgun with Charlie, discussing a variety of Second Amendment issues, upcoming Supreme Court decisions, concealed carry rights, and grassroots advocacy efforts. The show blended legal analysis, personal experiences, and interviews with representatives from Women for Gun Rights, creating a wide-ranging discussion about the current state of gun rights activism in America. The opening segment focused heavily on several anticipated Supreme Court decisions expected before the end of the Court's term. Amanda expressed excitement about the pending rulings, particularly those involving firearms rights. The hosts discussed the Wolford case, often referred to as the "vampire rule" case because it involves laws that effectively prohibit carrying firearms on private property unless owners explicitly invite gun owners to do so. Amanda explained that the case could have major implications for how states define "sensitive places" where firearms may be prohibited. The hosts argued that some states have expanded the definition of sensitive places so broadly that lawful concealed carry has become nearly impossible, and they hope the Court will establish a clearer, narrower standard. Another major topic involved the Supreme Court case concerning marijuana users and firearm ownership. The discussion centered on the inconsistency of federal law, which specifically prohibits firearm ownership by marijuana users while treating other legal and illegal substances differently. Amanda questioned why marijuana receives unique treatment on federal firearms forms and argued that the Court may be forced to address broader issues involving employment, driving regulations, workers' compensation claims, and personal freedoms. Charlie shared a humorous story from his younger days when he innocently questioned a job interviewer about drug testing procedures and accidentally made himself look suspicious despite never having used drugs. The hosts agreed that any decision could have consequences far beyond firearms law and may require lawmakers to reconsider how impairment and substance use are measured and regulated. The conversation expanded into a broader discussion about individual liberty and personal responsibility. Charlie described his evolution from a traditional conservative perspective toward a more libertarian outlook, emphasizing that people should generally be free to make their own choices so long as they do not infringe on the rights of others. Amanda agreed, using the familiar analogy that one person's rights end where another person's rights begin. This led to a philosophical discussion about constitutional rights, self-defense, and accountability for one's actions. Returning to the Wolford case, Amanda expressed particular interest because attorney Alan Beck, who is involved in the litigation, is someone she knows personally. She described him as a dedicated constitutional advocate and emphasized how significant the case could become for concealed carry permit holders nationwide. The hosts explained that several states have attempted to designate vast numbers of locations as sensitive places where firearms are prohibited, effectively undermining the practical exercise of carry rights recognized in recent Supreme Court decisions. They believe the Court's ruling could help define constitutional limits on such restrictions. The discussion also touched on the reality of navigating complex carry laws. Charlie admitted that many gun owners face difficult decisions when entering locations with firearm restrictions, noting that ordinary people often encounter conflicting laws and regulations. Amanda emphasized that she has always tried to avoid becoming a legal test case, joking that she never wants a Supreme Court case named after her because that generally means someone's rights were violated or a serious legal conflict occurred. The hosts reflected on how quickly ordinary citizens can become involved in landmark legal battles simply by exercising what they believe are their constitutional rights. Another significant topic involved the intersection of politics and firearms rights. Amanda noted that Supreme Court decisions unrelated to firearms can still affect the Second Amendment indirectly. She cited redistricting cases and election-related rulings as examples of decisions that may influence legislative control and ultimately determine the future of gun laws. The hosts discussed gerrymandering, congressional representation, and census-related debates, examining how political power and representation can affect firearm policy at both the state and federal levels. The second half of the program featured an interview recorded at the NRA Annual Meeting with representatives from Women for Gun Rights. Guests Tammy and Kate discussed the organization's upcoming National Summit, which marks the group's ...
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    54 min
  • 6726 hr1
    Jun 8 2026
    This episode of Eye on the Target Radio featured hosts Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell, joined in-studio by Charlie Cook of Riding Shotgun with Charlie. The conversation began with reflections on a recent New England firearms advocacy conference organized by the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. The hosts praised the event for maintaining a strong regional focus on issues facing the New England states rather than allowing national figures to dominate the discussion. They emphasized how valuable it was for activists, advocates, and organizations from across the region to connect, compare strategies, and build relationships around shared legislative and cultural challenges. The discussion then shifted to innovative grassroots outreach efforts. Amanda highlighted an event hosted by the Connecticut Citizens Defense League where wild game harvested by local hunters was served to legislators and visitors at the state capitol. The hosts discussed how events like these help humanize gun owners and hunters, demonstrating the connection between firearms, conservation, food sourcing, and outdoor traditions. They suggested that displaying photos of the hunters and the firearms used to harvest the game could help further educate the public about responsible firearm ownership and hunting practices. From there, the conversation moved into hunting experiences and shooting skills. The hosts exchanged humorous stories about hunting, including discussions about bear hunting regulations and the challenges of bow hunting. Amanda described her own struggles with archery accuracy, joking that her arrows often landed nowhere near the intended target despite extensive practice. This led to a broader discussion about the realities of marksmanship, the importance of understanding one's equipment, and how different people develop shooting skills at different rates. One of the most entertaining segments involved Amanda recounting an old firearms training class where she repeatedly asked an instructor questions about body positioning and balance while shooting. Her repeated question—"Where do I put my butt?"—became an inside joke among the hosts and served as a launching point for a discussion about how shooting instruction has evolved over the decades. They compared older shooting stances and techniques with modern approaches, noting that many methods once considered standard have largely disappeared from contemporary firearms training. The hosts spent considerable time discussing point shooting versus sighted fire. They explored the value of becoming so familiar with a firearm that a shooter can instinctively align it with a target. Charlie shared his experiences transitioning from traditional iron sights to a pistol equipped with a red dot optic, describing the learning curve involved in trusting the optic rather than searching for the sights. The conversation emphasized the importance of repetition, practice, and developing natural firearm presentation skills regardless of the aiming system being used. Reloading ammunition became another major topic. Charlie discussed the economics of handloading and how the financial benefits depend heavily on the type of ammunition being produced and how much a shooter practices. Rob and Amanda noted that while reloading can save money over time, it often evolves into a hobby of its own. They also joked about the temptation to accumulate yet another specialized hobby within the shooting sports world. Competitive shooting and advanced firearms skills were recurring themes throughout the episode. The hosts discussed top-level competitors such as Jerry Miculek and Lena Miculek, marveling at their extraordinary speed, coordination, and technical proficiency. They described examples of Lena performing remarkable feats such as loading shotguns while moving, balancing on exercise balls, riding unicycles, and engaging targets with incredible precision. These stories led to a broader discussion about dedication, practice, and the enormous amount of work required to achieve elite-level performance. Amanda contrasted those accomplishments with her own admitted lack of balance and coordination. She humorously recounted her fear of heights, inability to skip, and discomfort on rooftops, all while expressing admiration for athletes and shooters who possess exceptional balance and body control. The hosts used these stories to emphasize that different people have different natural abilities, but dedication and training can still produce significant improvement. The conversation also explored the concept of natural shooters—people who seem to possess an innate ability to hit targets with little formal training. Rob recalled a foster brother who rarely shot but could consistently excel at shotgun sports whenever he picked up a firearm. The hosts reflected on how some individuals appear to have exceptional hand-eye coordination and target acquisition skills, while others must ...
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    54 min
  • 53126 hr2
    Jun 1 2026
    This episode of Eye on the Target Radio focused on the hosts' visit to the Springfield Armory Museum in Massachusetts following the New England Firearms Advocacy Conference. Amanda Suffecool and Rob Campbell discussed the historical significance of the former federal armories at Springfield and Harpers Ferry, including the development of military firearms and manufacturing techniques. A major topic was the Pedersen Device, an innovative World War I-era conversion system designed by John Pedersen that could transform a bolt-action rifle into a semi-automatic firearm firing a pistol-caliber cartridge. Although thousands were produced, the end of World War I led to the devices being withdrawn and destroyed, making surviving examples rare collector pieces. The conversation also explored competing firearm designs of the early 20th century, the development of the M1 Garand, and the evolution of the Thompson submachine gun. The hosts were particularly impressed by the museum's manufacturing exhibits, which showcased the machinery and processes that revolutionized firearm production. They discussed interchangeable parts, rifling machines, stock-making equipment, and early industrial innovations such as the Blanchard stock-copying machine. Amanda reflected on how advances in manufacturing dramatically reduced production times and highlighted the ingenuity required to create mass-production systems using relatively primitive power sources such as water wheels and leather belts. The discussion also touched on the historic concentration of firearms manufacturers in western Massachusetts, including companies such as Savage Arms, O.F. Mossberg & Sons, and Iver Johnson. The second half of the program focused on current Second Amendment advocacy efforts. The hosts reviewed the recent New England Firearms Advocacy Conference, organized by Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, and discussed cooperation among groups such as the Second Amendment Foundation, the National Rifle Association, and various state-level organizations. Amanda announced plans to interview Joe LaPorta about the NRA's role in state-level legislative battles and its relationship with local advocacy groups. The hosts also examined several current legal and legislative issues. They discussed lawsuits challenging state restrictions on Glock pistols and so-called "Glock switch" regulations, arguing that courts continue to grapple with Second Amendment questions following the Supreme Court's Bruen decision. They highlighted proposed federal legislation known as the Veterans Second Amendment Protection Act, which seeks to prevent veterans from losing firearm rights solely because they receive assistance managing finances or daily affairs. Amanda and Rob argued that many veterans have been unfairly affected by existing policies and expressed support for reforms that would require stronger due-process protections. The show concluded with a discussion of Oregon's Initiative Petition 28, a proposed ballot measure framed around animal cruelty. The hosts argued that the proposal could have far-reaching consequences beyond animal welfare, potentially affecting hunting, fishing, ranching, pest control, and livestock breeding practices. They encouraged Oregon residents to carefully read the full text of the measure rather than relying solely on its title or promotional descriptions, emphasizing the importance of understanding the practical effects of ballot initiatives before voting. Throughout the episode, the hosts combined historical firearms discussion with contemporary debates over firearm rights, legislation, and public policy.
    Mostra di più Mostra meno
    54 min
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
Ancora nessuna recensione