Ep 376: Teacher Grading Workload- Why Grading Less May Be the Answer

Impossibile aggiungere al carrello

Puoi avere soltanto 50 titoli nel carrello per il checkout.

Riprova più tardi

Rimozione dalla Lista desideri non riuscita.

Riprova più tardi

Non è stato possibile aggiungere il titolo alla Libreria

Per favore riprova

Non è stato possibile seguire il Podcast

Per favore riprova

Esecuzione del comando Non seguire più non riuscita

Ep 376: Teacher Grading Workload- Why Grading Less May Be the Answer

Ascolta gratuitamente

Vedi i dettagli del titolo

Offerte di stagione | 0,99 €/mese per i primi 3 mesi

A seguire 9,99 €/mese – si applicano condizioni. Puoi disdire mensilmente.

A proposito di questo titolo

Grading less may be the answer for secondary teachers whose planning periods and evenings disappear under unfinished assignments. On The Secondary Teacher Podcast, this episode of The Secondary Teacher Podcast examines why teacher grading workload can grow far beyond what student learning actually requires.Links mentioned in this episode:Grab the Multi-Prep Grading Reset that goes along with this series here: https://khristenmassic.com/gradepodGrab the Secondary Teacher Systems Toolkit here: https://khristenmassic.thrivecart.com/systemstoolkit/?ref=pod Planning for the next school year? If your day is organized by class period, your planning calendar should be too. Grab my Editable Class Period Calendar here: https://khristenmassic.com/secondarycalendarpodGet the Planning Period Reset Toolkit—a free set of quick-start tools to help you protect your time, focus faster, and finally finish something… even during chaotic school days. https://khristenmassic.com/resetShop my Teachers Pay Teachers store: https://www.teacherspayteachers.com/Store/Khristen-Massic-Cte-Teacher-CoachThe common mistake is assuming the solution is to become faster at grading. More discipline. Better systems. A stronger push through the pile. That approach misses the more important question: why is every assignment being graded in the first place? When grading things that never needed a grade becomes part of the routine, efficiency only helps you complete unnecessary work more efficiently.The episode opens with a familiar scene for teachers with multiple preps. A project waits in one class, practice assignments pile up in another, and quizzes sit unfinished in a third. Every new stack requires a mental reset. What were students supposed to learn? What does this assignment show? Which standard does it connect to? A small decision made across several classes can quietly create hours of grading workload taking too much time away from planning.A specific moment from an engineering class made the problem impossible to ignore. During year six of teaching engineering, a student missed a significant amount of class and earned a low grade. Yet when the student was present, the student understood CAD software well enough to help a classmate who was stuck. Another student attended consistently, completed acceptable work, and earned a higher grade. The uncomfortable question followed: what was the grade actually measuring?Part of the answer was bell ringers. An administration wanted teachers to use them to address tardiness, and grading them seemed like a way to give the routine more weight. Students could earn points for completing the opening task and starting class on time. But when a student missed class, the student also missed the bell ringer and the points. The grade began reflecting attendance and participation rather than understanding of computer-aided drafting or the software used in the course.That distinction matters in every secondary classroom. Attendance matters. Responsibility matters. Completing work matters. But an academic grade should communicate something useful about what a student knows and can do. If points are being used primarily to encourage a behavior, it’s worth asking whether those points belong in the academic grade. The episode doesn’t offer a blanket rule for every school or district. It pushes teachers to become more intentional about the evidence behind each grade and the message the grade sends.The conversation also connects grading workload to instructional quality. Time spent processing assignments is time unavailable for designing stronger practice, planning opportunities for students to talk through ideas, or creating structures that require students to do more of the thinking. When grading consumes the planning period and follows teachers home, direct instruction can become the default simply because there’s no mental space left to change it. The cost of grading everything reaches far beyond the gradebook.That’s why looking at student work, giving feedback and recording a grade should be treated as separate decisions. Looking at student work can help determine what to teach next. Feedback can help a student correct a mistake while the learning is still underway. A recorded grade can document meaningful evidence of what students have learned. Those purposes overlap sometimes, but they don’t always call for the same response. Not every paper needs a score, and not every piece of feedback needs to become a permanent grade.For teachers with multiple preps, this distinction becomes even more important. An assignment that seems manageable in one class can become a major workload when repeated across several sections and courses. Daily assignments, late work, projects, and quizzes all carry a hidden cost. The question is not whether student work deserves attention. The question is whether the grade being recorded gives useful information about learning.This episode is especially relevant to CTE ...

Ancora nessuna recensione