In this episode of Compliance Technologies, we continue the HIPAA series with a focused look at the HIPAA Security Rule and what it actually requires in practice.

The Security Rule governs how electronic protected health information (ePHI) must be safeguarded through administrative, physical, and technical controls. Rather than prescribing specific tools, HIPAA requires organizations to assess risk, implement reasonable and appropriate safeguards, and continuously review how systems protect sensitive health data.

This episode explains how the Security Rule functions as a feedback loop between risk, safeguards, and system behavior, and why flexibility in implementation does not mean flexibility in responsibility.

If you work with healthcare systems, data, or compliance, this short episode clarifies what the Security Rule is really asking and why consistent protection matters more than perfect controls.

In this episode of Compliance Technologies, we continue the HIPAA series by focusing on the HIPAA Privacy Rule and one of its most important principles: minimum necessary.

The Privacy Rule governs how protected health information (PHI) may be used and disclosed, but its real operational impact lies in how organizations limit access to PHI, even when use is permitted. This episode explains what “minimum necessary” means in practice, when it applies, and why it turns everyday access decisions into compliance decisions.

We explore how minimum necessary is enforced through system design rather than intent, why overly broad access represents a compliance risk even without a breach, and how regulators evaluate whether organizations are truly limiting exposure to PHI.

If you build, operate, or oversee systems that handle health information, this conversation clarifies how the Privacy Rule shapes access, workflows, and accountability across healthcare environments.

In this special episode of Compliance Technologies, we announce the launch of the Compliance Signal Enumeration (CSE) Registry, a public, open-source infrastructure for defining and referencing compliance signals.

Modern compliance frameworks increasingly rely on automation, tooling, and continuous evidence collection, yet the industry lacks a shared vocabulary for describing what is actually being measured. Without a canonical way to reference compliance signals, evidence becomes ambiguous, integrations become brittle, and trust degrades across tools, vendors, and audits.

The CSE Registry addresses this gap by providing a framework-agnostic, machine-readable, and human-auditable registry of compliance signals. It is designed to support compliance platforms, security tools, evidence pipelines, and audit workflows by offering a stable reference point for observable, reproducible, and verifiable compliance facts.

This episode explains why the registry exists, how it is intended to be used, and why treating compliance as infrastructure, rather than documentation, is essential for the future of continuous and provable compliance.

The CSE Registry is publicly available at cseregistry.org, with the open-source repository hosted on GitHub.