Commonwealth v. Greer
Impossibile aggiungere al carrello
Puoi avere soltanto 50 titoli nel carrello per il checkout.
Riprova più tardi
Riprova più tardi
Rimozione dalla Lista desideri non riuscita.
Riprova più tardi
Non è stato possibile aggiungere il titolo alla Libreria
Per favore riprova
Non è stato possibile seguire il Podcast
Per favore riprova
Esecuzione del comando Non seguire più non riuscita
Commonwealth v. Greer
-
Letto da:
-
Di:
A proposito di questo titolo
Send us a text
Host Corrie Woods interviews attorney Brandy Grace Hoke to discuss Commonwealth v. Greer, which clarified when and how petitioners under the Post-Conviction Relief Act must seek and obtain new counsel to raise, and raise, claims of ineffective assistance of earlier postconviction counsel, on penalty of waiver. The case is required reading for anyone who practices in the postconviction space.
Show Notes:
- Greer builds on the Court's decision in Commonwealth v. Bradley, which held that petitioners can raise claims of ineffective assistance of prior postconviction counsel for the first time on appeal. In 2022, Corrie and Attorney Michael Wiseman discussed Bradley in an earlier episode.
- You can find the Court's opinion and Justice Donohue's concurring and dissenting opinion on SCOPABlog's June 2024 Docket Review.
Read more about Greer and all of the Court's cases on SCOPAblog.
And thanks as always to our producers, Ashley Woods, Rachel Annevelink, and Jaron Drake, for their hard work in making this episode a reality.
Ancora nessuna recensione