Claude, Codex, and the Agent Harness Problem (BIF Ep 15)
Impossibile aggiungere al carrello
Rimozione dalla Lista desideri non riuscita.
Non è stato possibile aggiungere il titolo alla Libreria
Non è stato possibile seguire il Podcast
Esecuzione del comando Non seguire più non riuscita
-
Letto da:
-
Di:
Claude and Codex workflows depend on more than the model: context, permissions, quotas, and the harness shape the result.
Mike, Joe, and Josh talk through a practical AI coding agent discussion: testing a new AI coding tool on Windows, deciding how much access to give an agent, how Claude and Codex handle projects differently, and why moving work between harnesses is not always seamless.
Topics include:
- AI coding agents on Windows
- Claude, Codex, and different agent harnesses
- Giving agents repo access without handing over private data
- Owning your context instead of fighting tool-specific project state
- Claude subscription limits, third-party usage, and token burn
- Why learning the harness matters before expecting the workflow to transfer
Chapters:
- 00:00 Opening
- 00:23 Combining the episode and testing an AI tool on Windows
- 11:04 The first magic and reliability gap
- 20:59 Enterprise concerns and agent permissions
- 22:25 Letting Codex work on trusted repos
- 27:33 Context windows and agent harnesses
- 34:23 Claude, subscriptions, and third-party harnesses
- 39:13 Extra usage, token burn, and safety questions
- 43:09 Owning your context
- 44:19 Moving context between different harnesses
- 50:04 Learning how each harness works
More Build It Faster: https://fasterpod.com