Calm, Clear, and Devastating: A Masterclass in Debate | Weighed in the Balance Ep. 45
Impossibile aggiungere al carrello
Rimozione dalla Lista desideri non riuscita.
Non è stato possibile aggiungere il titolo alla Libreria
Non è stato possibile seguire il Podcast
Esecuzione del comando Non seguire più non riuscita
Calm, Clear, and Devastating: A Masterclass in Debate | Weighed in the Balance Ep. 45
-
Letto da:
-
Di:
A proposito di questo titolo
Send us a text
What does a good theological argument actually look like?
In this episode of Weighed in the Balance, I return to the 2021 debate between Nathan Cravat and Mitch Canupp—not to rehash personalities or score cheap points, but to use the debate itself as a case study in how arguments should (and should not) be made.
Focusing on Cravat’s response to the opening question—“Do we have a perfect Bible today?”—I walk through what makes an argument strong: careful definitions, sound exegesis, historical awareness, logical consistency, and above all, clarity without cruelty. Along the way, we contrast this with the kinds of sloppy claims, moving goalposts, and shrinking definitions that often characterize weak positions.
This episode is not an attack on individuals, nor is it a rant against the King James Version itself. Instead, it’s an exercise in discernment: learning how to recognize when an argument stands on Scripture—and when it’s propped up by rhetoric, conspiracy, or special pleading.
If you care about truth, charity, and intellectual honesty—especially in theological debates—this episode is for you.
Support the show
Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!
Click here to find us everywhere!!