First published in A Reasonable Rant: Private Edition (members-only subscription) on 26 Feb 2026.
In Episode 15, Neo examines valuation not as a financial output, but as a behavioural system that shaped venture capital decisions between 2020 and 2025. Drawing on over 28,000 global funding events and a focused analysis of Asian markets, the episode unpacks how valuation drifted from an analytical tool into a negotiated signal. As traditional methods like discounted cash flow and comparables break down in early-stage environments, a simpler mechanism quietly takes over. Ownership becomes arithmetic, and arithmetic becomes value.

As the cycle unfolds, the consequences become harder to ignore. Inflated starting points create expectations most companies cannot sustain, while capital concentration at the top distorts the perception of recovery for everyone else. What looks like progress in aggregate often hides fragility at the company level, where time between rounds lengthens, valuation step-ups shrink, and the next milestone becomes harder to reach.

This episode reframes valuation entirely. Not as a verdict on what a company is worth, but as a commitment that shapes what it must become. Because once the number is set, it doesn’t just reflect reality. It starts to define it.

First published in A Reasonable Rant: Private Edition (members-only subscription) on 19 Feb 2026.
In this episode, Neo examines the venture studio model beyond its surface appeal. Drawing on a dataset of 406 studios and 1,843 startups across 45 countries, the analysis moves past portfolio optics to interrogate the system itself. Venture studios are designed to remove early-stage friction, accelerate launch, and improve survival rates. And on those terms, they work. But the data reveals a quieter tension: efficiency at the start does not translate into durability over time.

As the episode unfolds, a pattern emerges. Success is highly concentrated, transition from studio to independent company remains fragile, and capital continues to follow the same power law seen in traditional venture. The issue is not that studios fail to create companies, but that they are optimised for beginnings rather than continuity. What looks like progress at the portfolio level often masks a deeper structural gap at the system level.

This episode reframes the venture studio conversation entirely. Not as a question of whether the model works, but what it is actually designed to do and where that design stops. Because once you separate survival from endurance, the real question becomes unavoidable: are we building companies, or simply building more efficient ways to start them?

First published in A Reasonable Rant: Private Edition (members-only subscription) on 12 Feb 2026.

In Part 2 of this series, Neo moves beyond Davos as a coordination layer and tests its assumptions against reality. Drawing on over 27,000 funding records across eight continental zones and a structural review of more than 1,300 venture capital firms, this episode unpacks a harder truth: between 2020 and 2025, the world did not converge. It diverged. What appears as a global narrative is often a visibility illusion, shaped by uneven data, capital concentration, and incomplete maps of where innovation actually happens.

This episode explores the deeper fractures beneath the surface. The sensor problem that distorts what we see. The stage gaps that prevent companies from scaling. The myth of a shared recovery. And the uncomfortable reality that capital does not fix systems, it amplifies them. What emerges is not a rejection of global coordination, but a clearer lens for reading it. Because once you see the map properly, the question changes: not whether innovation is growing, but where it holds, where it breaks, and why.