40-Years Of Research On Motion Control Running Shoes?
Impossibile aggiungere al carrello
Rimozione dalla Lista desideri non riuscita.
Non è stato possibile aggiungere il titolo alla Libreria
Non è stato possibile seguire il Podcast
Esecuzione del comando Non seguire più non riuscita
-
Letto da:
-
Di:
A proposito di questo titolo
This podcast argues that the long-standing concept of motion control in running shoes lacks a foundation in scientific evidence. Despite decades of commercial marketing and professional recommendations, peer-reviewed research shows that these shoes only alter joint movement by negligible margins that often fall within the range of natural variability. Studies indicate that while footwear can slightly influence rearfoot motion, the effects are too small and inconsistent to justify the term "control." Because the data fails to support the industry's kinematic claims, the author suggests that the current product terminology is misleading and should be retired. Instead of relying on footwear categories, the source posits that actual stability is a complex interaction between ground forces and the human neuromotor system. An honest,scienficially rational, and evidence-based new taxonomy for the classification of running shoes is proposed.