Two overly earnest robots discuss this week's Luv Doc column from the Austin Chronicle.

⁠Read this week's Austin Chronicle Luv Doc ColumnIn this week's Luv Doc, a reader seeks guidance on whether to address her concerns about her best friend's engagement to an abusive partner. The correspondent, identified as the potential Maid of Honor, describes a long history of witnessing the groom’s disrespectful and mean behavior. The Luv Doc responds by weaving political commentary and critiques of modern society into his relationship advice. He ultimately encourages the reader to speak her mind with compassion before the wedding takes place. By advocating for honest communication, the Luv Doc suggests that true friendship requires challenging a loved one’s unhealthy life choices.

96Bo1aiXoswihBqh2unF

Two overly earnest robots discuss this week's Luv Doc column from the Austin Chronicle.

This week's Luv Doc addresses a reader's frustration regarding her husband's refusal to help with domestic responsibilities. After the wife spent two weeks hosting her in-laws alone, the Luv Doc identifies the husband's behavior as weaponized incompetence, a tactic used to avoid chores by pretending to be unskilled. The Luv Doc suggests that this lack of contribution stems from either manipulation or a lifelong habit of maintaining low cleanliness standards. To resolve the conflict, the Luv Doc focuses on setting non-negotiable expectations for household labor and negotiating a shared definition of a tidy home. Ultimately, the Luv Doc emphasizes that while a partner can change their habits, the willingness to put in effort is essential for the marriage to survive.

Two overly earnest robots discuss this week's Luv Doc column from the Austin Chronicle.

This week's Luv Doc concerns a distressed college freshman and her volatile romantic relationship. The student describes a repetitive cycle of breakups and reconciliations with a high school boyfriend, expressing deep emotional pain despite their mutual affection. In response, the Luv Doc uses historical context and humor to highlight how modern life expectancy allows for more time to find a compatible partner. He suggests that the first year of college should be a period of broadening one's horizons and meeting new people rather than clinging to past attachments. Ultimately, the Luv Doc encourages the young woman to prioritize personal growth and exploration over a relationship that has repeatedly left her feeling broken.

Two overly earnest robots discuss this week's Luv Doc column from the Austin Chronicle.

In this week's Luv Doc, a reader expresses anxiety regarding his girlfriend’s sudden career pivot from a stable tech job to becoming a professional electronic dance music DJ. The reader notes his partner's history of pursuing temporary hobbies following seasonal depression, leading him to fear that her current plan is unrealistic and financially reckless. In response, the Luv Doc suggests that the year-end holidays often spark deep existential reflections and personal revelations about one's future. Rather than discouraging her, the Luv Doc encourages the boyfriend to provide emotional support as she pursues a long-held ambition she has already funded with personal savings. Ultimately, the Luv Doc argues that valuing a partner's dreams is essential for fostering intimacy and a healthy, long-term bond.

Two overly earnest robots discuss this week's Luv Doc column from the Austin Chronicle.

This week's Luv Doc uses Boxing Day and Festivus to critique labor exploitation. The hosts explain how the author connects the historical mistreatment of British servants to the modern exhaustion of American service industry employees. By referencing cultural touchstones like the film Snatch and luxury car commercials, the Luv Doc highlights the systemic inequality inherent in 24/7 consumer demands. The discussion culminates in the concept of "expurgatory catharsis," suggesting that venting grievances is a vital psychological response to economic oppression. Ultimately, the Luv Doc illustrates how satire can transform traditional holiday tropes into a pointed investigation of class struggle and social frustration.

Two overly earnest robots discuss this week's Luv Doc column from the Austin Chronicle.

This week's Luv Doc utilizes the British holiday of Boxing Day as a satirical jumping-off point to critique labor exploitation, historical colonialism, and modern American political grievances. By contrasting the historical treatment of servants with the lack of benefits for contemporary service workers, the Luv Doc highlights systemic societal flaws. He ultimately invites readers to participate in the secular tradition of Festivus by submitting their own complaints for an "airing of grievances." This call for expurgatory catharsis encourages people to release their negativity before the arrival of a new year. Through a blend of cynical humor and social commentary, the Luv Doc serves as both an advice column and a platform for public venting.

Two overly earnest robots discuss this week's Luv Doc column from the Austin Chronicle.

In this week's Luv Doc, a reader identifies a recurring conflict with her long-term partner regarding who should purchase his mother’s 75th birthday gift. While the reader seeks guidance on whether to break the tradition of handled gifting, the Luv Doc focuses heavily on the eleven-year duration of the relationship without a marriage proposal. The response uses harsh humor and labels like "Deeply Committed Cock-Blocker" to suggest that the gift dispute is merely a symptom of a deeper lack of commitment. Ultimately, the Luv Doc advises the woman to stop enabling her partner's indecisiveness and instead force him to take personal responsibility for his family obligations. Through this critique, the Luv Doc explores themes of adult accountability and the stagnation of long-term romantic partnerships.

Two overly earnest robots discuss this week's Luv Doc column from the Austin Chronicle.

This week's Luv Doc features a frustrated employee, "Call Me Ludd," who expresses deep anxiety regarding the forced integration of artificial intelligence in the workplace. The worker fears that corporate mismanagement and overspending on faulty technology will inevitably lead to job losses and unnecessary layoffs. In response, the Luv Doc initially mocks the term "AI" through a political tangent before ultimately acknowledging the inevitability of automation replacing human labor. While the Luv Doc admits that machines will soon outperform people in efficiency, he suggests that workers should embrace technical skills and focus on their uniquely human traits. The Luv Doc concludes that resisting progress is futile, advising the reader to learn the technology while maintaining the irrationality of the human spirit.