Probably propaganda

This book claims to evaluate scientific research and positions but is written by politicians and attempts to influence the reader away from environmental issues. The “best friend business ever had” probably doesn’t have the prerequisite knowledge or authority to dissect well know environmental issues!

2 persone l'hanno trovata utile

'Fake News' for global problems 🥶🙃

Granted this book was like Republican scientists trying to counter the facts of all the global problems that we face. The science is factual and heavily biased, but good to get thru. Ozone, asbestos, nuclear power, organic food, rising sea levels and climate change; all are discussed and good topics. It'd be good with a 2020 refresh given it was published about 30 years ago.

1 persona l'ha trovata utile

Horrible

Absolutely the worst thing I’ve ever had the misfortune of reading. Absolutely no facts. Old ideals and opinions that are thankfully dying out with the age of the blind “trust that the government has our best in mind” mentality. Total rubbish. I feel like I’ve lost brain cells listening to this crud.

1 persona l'ha trovata utile

Very informative!

So thankful for another well researched perspective on the environmental issues...her experience with working with presidents and as governor of Washington was especially interesting.

Required Reading For Both Sides of the GreenDebate

This book does as good a job as any I've read at identifying the issues, investigating the substantive facts and drawing reasoned conclusions without jumping to the same politically-driven, pre-determined positions that we've heard ad nauseum in the pet media of both sides. It seems the more I learn about these often complex scientific issues, the more I have come to realize that both sides have some truth in their positions, but both are substantially wrong in the rigidity, dogmatism and simplistic jingoism of their stances and solutions. And that uninformed rigidity seems like a bigger obstacle to finding a workable solution to these problems than just about anything else.

In other words, there's way too much politics and not nearly enough science in the Green debate these days, in part because the science is often more complex and nuanced than a factoid on a flyer or a talking point on some pundit's cable TV show. But the authors of "Trashing the Planet" do a phenomenal job making the science not only understandable, but genuinely intriguing, and that alone should recommend it for wide consumption. I really enjoyed reading this book, and was pleasantly surprised at the way it pulled me through the chapters.

That said, I would not recommend this book if all you want is to have your existing views validated, whatever they may be. This book changed my perspective on a few things I thought I understood better than I actually did, and gave me a deeper perspective on many others. To me, that's the sign of a truly well-written, well-argued book. There will surely be folks on both sides of the debate who will find simplistic, politically-sanctioned ways to trash "Trashing the Planet." But to anyone with even a shred of doubt, a flicker of curiosity or a glimmer of desire to learn more about subjects that should transcend politics but rarely do, this book is a treasure.

1 persona l'ha trovata utile