Did you know that most scientists are global-warming skeptics? Or that environmental alarmists have knowingly promoted false and exaggerated data on global warming? Or that in the Left's efforts to suppress free speech (and scientific research), they have compared global warming dissent with "treason"? Shocking, frank, and illuminating, Chris Horner's Red Hot Lies explodes as many myths as Al Gore tries to promote.
Thirty years ago I believed in "global warming". As I began to value knowledge more than beliefs over the years, I became a skeptic. This is a hyperbole filled mishmash with a political bent, and unfortunately it will not convert the believers.
10 su 13 utenti hanno ritenuto utile questa recensione
I really enjoyed a thoughtful and well thought out argument that was made convincingly with a sense of humor. Makes you want to get out there with your own Powerpoint presentation and challenge the youth of your city about their "strongly held beliefs".
What happened to critical thinking skills in this country?
24 su 38 utenti hanno ritenuto utile questa recensione
I want to believe in Christopher C. Horner. A least the so called global warming is overrated.
Anyway is a pleasure to listen some convincing one from the other side.
But, seven billion in Earth? This is beyond over. You will see what they will do to the Seas.
Worth listening. Also Robert Dean is good.
2 su 3 utenti hanno ritenuto utile questa recensione
Unfortunately this book does nothing but bash the scientists who agree with Climate Change. Not much evidence is shown to support the authors claims of a terrible conspiracy theory other than anecdotal miles of text.
13 su 26 utenti hanno ritenuto utile questa recensione
Where does Red Hot Lies rank among all the audiobooks you’ve listened to so far?
Among the best non fiction.
What other book might you compare Red Hot Lies to and why?
State of Fear because it deals with the same subject.
Which scene was your favorite?
If you were to make a film of this book, what would be the tag line be?
Any additional comments?
This should be required reading in high schools and universities in order to balance the unending assertions that the science is settled. It is not!
1 su 3 utenti hanno ritenuto utile questa recensione
The book if full of annoying factual errors which detract from the point I thought he was trying to make - that the media exaggerates and never corrects. But it hard to take the author seriously - talking about the problems of an alarmist culture, a relatively serious point, if his own information is fatally flawed.
2 su 4 utenti hanno ritenuto utile questa recensione