Vantaggi dell'abbonamento Vantaggi dell'abbonamento
  • Accedi ad un universo di contenuti audio, senza limiti d'ascolto.
  • Ascolta dove vuoi, quando vuoi, anche offline.
  • Dopo i primi 30 giorni gratis l’iscrizione si rinnova automaticamente a EUR 9,99 al mese.
  • Cancella la tua iscrizione in ogni momento.

Sintesi dell'editore

More than 60 years ago, William S. Burroughs and Jack Kerouac, two novice writers at the dawn of their careers, sat down to write a novel about the summer of 1944, when one of their friends killed another in a moment of brutal and tragic bloodshed. Alternating chapters, they pieced together a hard-boiled tale of bohemian New York during World War II, full of drugs and obsession, art and violence.

The manuscript, named after a line from a news story about a fire at a circus, was rejected by publishers and confined to a filing cabinet for decades. Now, for the first time, this legendary collaboration between two of the 20th century's most influential writers is being released. Both a fascinating piece of American literary history and an engrossing, atmospheric novel, it brings to life a shocking murder at the dawn of the Beat Generation.

©2008 the Estate of Jack Kerouac and the William S. Burroughs Trust; (P)2008 Blackstone Audio, Inc.

Altri titoli dello stesso

Cosa ne pensano gli iscritti

Non ci sono recensioni disponibili
Ordina per:
  • Totali
  • Jeff
  • 20 08 2009

Pre-Beat Lit, instant classic!

I was skeptic... lost book? Burroughs and Kerouac? Does the phrase "too good to be true" come to mind. Yet, to my delight, this could turn out to be one of my favorite pieces of midcentury counter-culture lit. Jack and William take turns with chapters, allowing a really neat multi-perspective view of the controversial plot. Ray does a great job reading, as usual. The epilogue is a great treat, the true story behind the novel.

5 su 5 utenti hanno ritenuto utile questa recensione

  • Totali
  • Interpretazione
  • Storia
  • Scott
  • 30 08 2015

Not a great story.

Put into the context of a biography written many years before the characters/authors of the Beat Generation, this story is interesting.

As a stand alone piece, the story is not very good.

  • Totali
  • Interpretazione
  • Storia
  • Allison
  • 05 02 2012


If you could sum up And the Hippos Were Boiled in Their Tanks in three words, what would they be?

historical, shocking, honest

What did you like best about this story?

The movement between chapters made it impossible to stop listening.

What does Ray Porter bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you just read the book?

I felt like I was listening to the authors telling their story.

Was this a book you wanted to listen to all in one sitting?


Any additional comments?

Dare I say this may be my favorite Kerouac?

  • Totali
  • Interpretazione
  • Storia
  • Ashley
  • 13 12 2011

I tried.

I wish I had read the other reviews before I bought this. It's awful. I can't even finish it and I ALWAYS finish any book I've started. It just makes no sense; it's very difficult to follow along.

1 su 3 utenti hanno ritenuto utile questa recensione

Ordina per:
  • Totali
  • Interpretazione
  • Storia
  • Mr. C. G. Moore
  • 14 03 2017

flat, uninteresting and dissapointing

What disappointed you about And the Hippos Were Boiled in Their Tanks?

if you've read the schpeel and know it's about a murder then that is the only interesting bit spoilt, it is also dealt with in the last 20mins. This is not hard-boiled and full of sex and violence but a few dreary fumblings and a murder that is bearly mentioned. It doesnt tick any box, not pulpy enough to be pulp, not artistic or poetic enough to be art. The 2 writer's different viewpoints and styles is a little interesting but nothing really happens. There is a great story to be told, just look up the real murder on wikipedia. And if wikipedia do a better job than, not one, but two writers you are doing something wrong. Love the title but this should have never seen the light of day

What will your next listen be?


Which scene did you most enjoy?

It was all just aimless and I was just waiting to get to the murder that was spoilt in the blurb

If you could play editor, what scene or scenes would you have cut from And the Hippos Were Boiled in Their Tanks?

I would open with the murder (as promised on the back of the book), then present flashbacks to how it got to that point. The obsessions, the relationships between characters, the creepiness. Little things suggested in the beginning of the book, playing out to the final outcome. Things develop to a feverpitch, present it as a suspense novel. None of that is in this novel.

Any additional comments?

It could have been a Hitchcockian style thriller suspense, or a good character study, or an atmospheric portrayal of New York in 1944. But it is none of those.